Well of course, I thought it sort of went without being said that if nobody minds the words that are being thrown around, then there is no problem. I mean why would there? I was specifically talking about when words are being used that are hurtful AND unwelcome. Sorry about the confusion.Akio91 said:I replied to someone else at the same time you replied to me.Lilani said:Then tell me what parts I missed. I got "Aris is a piece of shit" and that you agree with Bob, but somehow that leaves room for defending slurs which doesn't make sense in my book.Akio91 said:I'm gonna assume you didn't read my post like I said. *shrug* Your loss. Stay mad.Lilani said:If that's the kind of behavior you will stand up for, then please, don't try to act like you're above Aris or have better standards than he does. Because you don't. Embrace what you do for what it is--bullying. Bullies dehumanize and explicitly try to hurt people for fun, and that's what slurs are. And if that's what you want the fighting community to consist of, then don't insult the rest of us by sugar coating it or acting like it's not as bad as we think. Because it is as bad as we think, and you will deserve every bit of criticism you get.Akio91 said:I'm mad that we posted this at the same time. xD
And yes, I do defend the use of slurs depending on the environment. Just look at my last post.
Perfect example: I play fighters will almost exclusively African-American (like all fighters, mirite? xD), so we throw around the "dreaded N-word" pretty casually. Occasionally some white kids game with us, and we don't get mad when they use the word, since we're in a relaxed environment where all kinds of trash talk is accepted. That, and, that word doesn't bother us at all.
And before you get your gender-neutral undergarments in a tizzy, I'm black.
Here's the thing: The point of shame, as a weapon of social-change, is not about changing people's minds by making them ashamed of themselves - most people, by the time they reach adulthood, don't fundamentally change. The point is to render their viewpoint so shameful in the eyes of the culture at large that it is progressively less likely to take hold in others as time goes on.I say old chap said:3) Connecting one to two via three, I would argue that you can push a liberal agenda, try to brow-beat the intolerant, publicly shame them, but this will only cause more reaction online, a greater show of what you hate. This is because the mockers can be anonymous and get away with it. If you argue against sexism, there will still be sexism, as inexcusable as it is.
Okay. That's why I kept stressing the part about Aris. He need his ass whopped in the worst way, and he's ruining casual trash talk for everyone.Lilani said:Well of course, I thought it sort of went without being said that if nobody minds the words that are being thrown around, then there is no problem. I mean why would there? I was specifically talking about when words are being used that are hurtful AND unwelcome. Sorry about the confusion.
That's a myth. People are capable of learning and self-improvement well into old age. It's true that their brains are a little less plastic, but that potential never completely goes away. It doesn't mean older people are a lost cause.MovieBob said:Here's the thing: The point of shame, as a weapon of social-change, is not about changing people's minds by making them ashamed of themselves - most people, by the time they reach adulthood, don't fundamentally change. The point is to render their viewpoint so shameful in the eyes of the culture at large that it is progressively less likely to take hold in others as time goes on.I say old chap said:3) Connecting one to two via three, I would argue that you can push a liberal agenda, try to brow-beat the intolerant, publicly shame them, but this will only cause more reaction online, a greater show of what you hate. This is because the mockers can be anonymous and get away with it. If you argue against sexism, there will still be sexism, as inexcusable as it is.
To put it another way; you don't change the world by making the man ashamed of himself, you change the world by making the son ashamed of the father.
Touché, good sir.ReiverCorrupter said:Well, depending upon your sexual proclivities it might be considered a utopian future. Especially if there is an ample supply of spandex.
You still haven't explained your method of time travel nor your century of origin.Smilomaniac said:Copenhagen. But it goes for any western city with a +million inhabitants.
Oh, I see. This isn't some dystopian future, it's some sort of broad brushing based on your own experiences, which may or may not be hyperbolic. I stand corrected. I assumed you came from some place of validity. Clearly, I was in error.It's not a doctrine or cult mentality, just a bunch of bad advice and typical of a home dictated by a dominant mother or society built on "gender equality". In my case it was the latter.
Thing is, no-one is denying that men ever get discriminated against, but that doesn't mean that it's as prevalent or that pointing out rampant sexism swinging the other way is somehow ignoring that it exists.Smilomaniac said:Thing is though, no one is denying that there's a problem with sexism or discrimination. The problem is that the focus is on women and their problems only. Sadly, it's probably the only way for most to take it seriously.Zachary Amaranth said:Did you enjoy knocking down that strawman? It seemed therapeutic.
Uhhh, we won this thing not-so-casually referred to as a Landmark Supreme Court case where video games were guaranteed the same First Amendemnt rights as all other forms of expressive media. Did you miss that? It wasn't even a split decision - it was 7-2 in favor.longboardfan said:I am confused. You said we're winning. What are we winning? How, and by who's standards. It sure seems like for every Jack Thompson slapdown, there's another 10 popup to carry on the anti-gamer cause. Then there was sopa, and acta, and pipa, and etc. Who's winning what now? And then there's the media where games caused the death's in Norway. yeah.
Don't congratulate him for calling out a guy if you don't know what he did. It makes you sound like a giant idiot.Okysho said:I agree, rock on bob! Seriously! I can't believe there are people trying to justify this... I haven't seen the clip in quesiton myself, but what the hell is this guy trying to justify?
Love the ending statement there too bob! This is why I watch your show.
Even it that is true its rude and goes beyond what could be called acceptable competitive behaviour.Volf said:using the word rape to mean lose doesn't equate to sexismflying_whimsy said:This is probably the most pissed off I've ever heard movie bob sound; I don't blame him, either, as I've said the exact same thing on more than one occasion over the last few years. I remember calling some friends out on throwing the word rape around more casually than I was comfortable with and they looked at me like I grew a second head.
Seriously, nerd culture based sexism is something I would seriously like to see go away. Forever.
No, but it does devalue the concept of rape as one of the most horrifying things a person can do to another human being, and certainly doesn't help deal with widespread rape culture.Volf said:using the word rape to mean lose doesn't equate to sexismflying_whimsy said:This is probably the most pissed off I've ever heard movie bob sound; I don't blame him, either, as I've said the exact same thing on more than one occasion over the last few years. I remember calling some friends out on throwing the word rape around more casually than I was comfortable with and they looked at me like I grew a second head.
Seriously, nerd culture based sexism is something I would seriously like to see go away. Forever.
It is trivializing one of the most traumatic experiences a person can foist on another human being to a mere "LOLOL I'M WINNING." If you don't see any problem in that, then you're ignorant as hell.Abandon4093 said:Like any of that actually needed to be addressed.
1 asshole =/= even a small portion of people who play games. His opinion of gaming-culture, which is a nonsense phrase to begin with, means exactly the same. The only reason that douche got any attention is because he was on some shite TV show.
People like you, responding to this type of behaviour as if it's actually some sort of real issue and not a few lone nuts being retardly backwards are what give the stereotype of 'sexist gamers' credence. Because it gives the impression it's a serious enough issue for it to be addressed.
News flash......... it's not.
And BTW, 'rape' is not a sexist phrase. What is sexist is your assumption that that phrase is in someway, only demeaning to women. You didn't overtly state that, but I don't really see any reason for you to have brought it up if that wasn't your point.
"I'm raping you!" When used in the context of a competition is in no way sexually explicit. It simply means one side/person is dominating the other side/person. If you read any more into it than that, you've got hangups.
NinjaDeathSlap said:This was the best episode in a while. Pretty much everything that needs saying about nerd culture is here. Just replace 'women' with any other subject matter and its pretty much 100% interchangeable.
Although, in defense of the 'Why are we even talking about this?' argument, I don't think that necessarily means people don't want to admit that these problems exist, more just 'Why is it my responsibility to tell these assholes to grow up? Why can't I just be free to not be associated with them?'
Don't assume I don't know what happened because I made a forum post congratulating a guy for a bringing attention to a much needed issue within the gaming culture. It makes you sound like a giant idiot.8-Bit_Jack said:Don't congratulate him for calling out a guy if you don't know what he did. It makes you sound like a giant idiot.Okysho said:I agree, rock on bob! Seriously! I can't believe there are people trying to justify this... I haven't seen the clip in quesiton myself, but what the hell is this guy trying to justify?
Love the ending statement there too bob! This is why I watch your show.
I have typed and retyped a post for this thread several times, but i seem to be incapable of doing so without resorting to angry gibbering, so I'll instead say that i mostly agree with bob for once, and leave it at that
Edit: having read the article, I can't help thinking that the author is being disingenuous. He makes several statements comparing the respective developers and communities. Without actual statements from the Publishers (I should have liked to see any numbers showing that Blizzard's involvement in SC tournaments was lucrative) or serious assessments of their relationship with the communities, they sound like willful assertions. He uses the word 'insular' when I rather suspect that 'bunkered' would be a better descriptor. 'Insular' has neutral connotations, whereas someone built the bunker.Windu23 said:I feel the need to point to this article [http://shoryuken.com/2011/12/12/guest-editorial-momentum-matters-a-historical-perspective-on-the-fgc-and-esports-communities-2/] again to better illustrate that point, because I'm just not as well versed in the finer details as others.
I was about to type in my response, but you put it way better than I could. Thank you.Susan Arendt said:I think some folks in this thread aren't fully aware of what Aris did. This went beyond trash talking, it went beyond friendly competition. He held a camera on a girl and sexually harassed her, and when she told him to stop, he said she had to put up with it because he was her coach and it was in the rules that she had to do anything he told her to.
Trash talking your buddies is great, it's part of the fun, and nobody is suggesting it should go away. But making someone feel worthless and afraid, because you find it fun? There's no defending that.