The Big Picture: Stuperior

Norix596

New member
Nov 2, 2010
442
0
0
As someone who has never followed an American style comic consistently, I never understood how it was possible to care about what goes on in this kind continuity/status quo arrangement when everything that happens that matters/ is significant is generally bound to be undone or retconned out in a year. That kind of seems to undermine the entire point of this kind of infinite continuity if these stories are functionally separate in that they start and end at the same status quo.
 

malestrithe

New member
Aug 18, 2008
1,818
0
0
I'm sick of listening to people whinge about how this plot twist is something they did not approve of and they are offended because they did not approve of it.

Marvel is planning to do this, "If Spider-Man were Batman" storyline for atleast a year, if not longer. It will not be permanent.

I'm aware of a lot of the twists an turns over the character over the years, even the time when he sold out and got a corporate sponsor, which led to the Spider Buggy creation. This one struck me as not a big freaking deal either.

At best it's a second act plot twist of a much longer plot. At worse, it's semi permanent and Spider-Man will have a Jeckyl and Hyde persona to deal with. Actually, that last one I want to see.
 

KoDOmega

New member
Nov 22, 2009
85
0
0
... whoa.

The actual big bad issue, Bob.

You missed it.

If most people are getting their panties in a twist over Spidey dying, that's fine.

The thing they should ACTUALLY be mad about?

ANYONE, INCLUDING AFOREMENTIONED REDHEADED CIPHER, HAVING A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH SPIDER-MAN.

Basically, Doc HAS to either tell his sexual partners he's actually a reformed supervillain in a superhero's body or else ANYTHING they do could be considered <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_fraud>rape by fraud, a very serious, very real crime that he could very easily perpetrate if he's not careful. Heck, by some definition, ANYTHING he does, regardless of what he tells people, could be considered rape... OF PETER PARKER.

Again, I AGREE with you on the fact that this story has a lot of potential for good, twist-on-the-mythos storytelling. But Doc better keep the pistol in his holster or else Spidey comics are going to get VERY uncomfortable VERY quickly.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
i have no issues with this.
however, one more day is terrible because what they wanted to achieve was simple, make spider-man single. and they picked the stupidest way to do it, especially considering how Mephisto before or since has never been powerful enough to do that. and the hilarity that almost literal gods are not able to heal a fucking bullet wound. and having Aunt May be the one in peril, it would have made a lot more sense if it was MJ who got shot and everyone else was on a coffee break.
oh and it was condescending to its audience.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Scarim Coral said:
So overall you're not against the changed they did to the character and yet you named the episode title "Stuperior" (from the word stupid right)? I mean I assume you were against it base from the title.
Maybe he meant stupendous. :3

OT: Back in the day I read my fair share of comics and from what I recall, yeah, the plot as laid out for this one really doesn't seem like anything out of the ordinary for comics (Marvel in particular). And I'd say that Bob's prediction of "Eh, if it doesn't work out, they'll just say that Parkker's memories gained more of a foothold and ousted Doc Oc's thoughts, leaving Parker back in his own body and in the end absolutely nothing is different" is likely going to be very true.

Beyond that, between this episode and the three week dissertation on Super Girl, I think Bob should start up a (perhaps monthly) show just talking about comic books. :3
 

Pat Hulse

New member
Oct 17, 2011
67
0
0
While I agree for the most part on the Doc Ock turn, I gotta disagree with "One More Day".

I don't hate "One More Day" because it's ridiculous, poorly-executed, and reeks of editorial mandate. I don't hate it because it results in a lot of mind-bogglingly stupid retcons that effectively give the finger to JMS's work on the series.

No, I hate "One More Day" because during JMS's run, I came to the realization that Spider-Man had been a kid for far too long. He needed to grow up and evolve. He needed to stop talking about responsibility and finally own up to it. And I was totally on board with this.

So when Peter is faced with mounting adversity from his friends and colleagues over the "Civil War" stuff, his beloved Aunt is knocking on Heaven's door, and his life as Peter Parker is thrown to the chopping block after revealing his identity, I thought this was the perfect opportunity for his character to finally hit a milestone.

When Mephisto showed up and offered him an easy way out for a (let's face it) meaningless price, I thought this would be the perfect moment for Peter to prove what the meaning of responsibility was. By rejecting Mephisto's offer not because it wasn't a good deal but because it meant running away from his problems for the sake of his own selfishness, it could have been probably one of the best moments in Spider-Man history. A defining moment.

But then, nope. Peter took the deal. All of his complications and problems? Swept away in an instant. All so that Spider-Man could go back to the way he used to be. He went back to living with Aunt May, his dead best friend came back, he was single, his new powers were gone, and we didn't get so much as a hint of regret from that supposed part of his soul that still remembered what he did.

The thing is... I related to Spider-Man in the events leading up to "One More Day" in a way that I hadn't since I was a kid. I could understand the struggles of responsibility and consequences that come with growing older. And it's not just that I can't relate to the younger, free-spirited Spider-Man or anything, it's just that I can't relate to a guy who, when faced with the problems of the real world that resulted from HIS choices and HIS mistakes, opts to sacrifice something that matters to him in order to cling onto simpler times that he should have grown past long before.

To me, "One More Day" felt like the story of a guy who married young, found out how hard it was, and then opted to get a divorce and move back home to live with his parents because those were the "good old days".

I can understand wanting to keep "Spider-Man" a character for young people to relate to, and I get that they couldn't have Peter retire and get replaced by a new kid because that rarely ever works out. But if they weren't going to have the balls to follow through on all these complications in Peter's life, then they shouldn't have bothered in the first place.
 

zombie711

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,505
0
0
Actually Bob there is a shortage of Peter Parker in comics
Marvel has systematically killed, canceled, or replaced almost every Peter Parker except for Marvel adventures (children comic) and Disney's Ultimate Spider-man (comic based off TV show)

They remain the last Peter Parkers in Comics

As for games, I dunno it been like 2 years since one came out (excluding the movie tie in)

Its a stark contrast to the Ultimate Universe where while I think Ultimate Peter Parker didnt need to die, still went out in a culmination of what made him a hero.

Ultimate Peter went out with a bang. 616 peter went out with a whisper.
And can you be spider-man if your new origin is killing the previous one?
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
thanks Bob. I needed a Comci are Weird Episode today. I don't know why but i'm feeling over worked and depressed, this is my day off and i needed something good humored. So thank for the video. OT i don't really have an opinion either way. My opinion on twists tends to be similar to yours i'd imagine. if it gives us new and interesting stories i'm on board. If it doesn't they will retcon it.
 

TheSchaef

New member
Feb 1, 2008
430
0
0
Bob makes a point in the end: in the end, it's a geek fantasy where the stories we like are just as implausible as the ones we don't.

See also: The Incredible Hulk, who for the sake of the plot, can now suddenly control his rage without any explanation. Which doesn't matter, cause that shot was AWESOME [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDajL441mZc].
 

Baron_BJ

Tired. Cold. Bored.
Nov 13, 2009
499
0
11
Ranorak said:
As a person interested in comics but by no means the money to collect them all,
I got really interested in this story line,

Any chance someone can mention what issue this arc supposedly starts in?
or what books to pick up?

I feel this might be a good point to get into The Amazing / Superior Spider-man now.
The arc starts at issue 698. Ignore issue #699.1 (not #699 itself because that's a different thing and actually is part of the story) as it's a prelude to an upcoming Morbius comic series.

My opinion is that this is terrible because Ock himself is an unlikable character to begin with (he was meant to be, so huzzah there) who attempted to mass murder 99.92% of the planet and now because he's suddenly had Peter's memories play through his head for maybe 10 seconds (literally) he's a good guy now and I'm meant to like him? No, he's still a complete asshole and the follow up in Avenging Spider-Man confirmed that. He's a colossal shitbag.

I've read pretty much every Spider-Man comic as well though and I have to say that the statement's regarding his deaths are an exaggeration. Yes, he's died before, but only in ways like in "The Other" (which was mentioned, the cocoon thing) where it was obvious that he wasn't dead because it was part of the story line (I don't think that part 4 or so out of a 12 part story is going to end early just to fuck with us).

I've read Slott's entire run as well and I agree that it's good, not the best thing I've ever read but I've had fun and that the story isn't too poorly written until the end where I felt it became fairly contrived and some of the dialogue from the start of the arc turned out to be a Red Herring (The stuff where Peter is wondering why he's willing to take the help of the villains in the break out and how he's meant to be the hero, etc). The biggest problem is that, especially in the follow up in Avenging Spider-Man #15.1, Ock still comes across as a monster who is treating others like garbage and using people. It's in character, but the character is someone who I want incarcerated and tortured, something which is rarely a desirable trait in these sorts of books, especially Spider-Man books.

Finally, with regards to continuity, yes, this will indeed be wiped out because it's a fucking horrible idea. But people say "It'll be retconned out, why do you care?" To which I say "Major retcons are stains that can't wash out". You listed off a few stupid things which have been retconned out, whilst true in a sense they still happened, The clone saga was a gigantic turd that ultimately amounted to nothing but it's still a big part of the character's history and character. It's like if you're watching a movie where a character is driving on an empty road to work, then suddenly gets beamed up into a UFO and anally probed before being sent back in time to the exact moment he was kidnapped with his memory wiped, only to have this never followed up on in the Movie. It ultimately does not affect the rest of the movie at all but as a whole it fucks things up from a story perspective, in the movie someone would go "why the fuck is this here?", in comics people just say "it's comics, deal with it or you're an idiot". Retcons are to be avoided unless absolutely necessary, not just thrown out there randomly, it's stupid crap like this that causes people to talk about how death in comics is meaningless, well this isn't helping! Avoiding major retcons such as what will come from this would over time maybe repair this reputation, make it so people will take it more seriously, get more involved, but if people just want to throw them around for no reason then that won't happen.

TheSchaef said:
Bob makes a point in the end: in the end, it's a geek fantasy where the stories we like are just as implausible as the ones we don't.

See also: The Incredible Hulk, who for the sake of the plot, can now suddenly control his rage without any explanation. Which doesn't matter, cause that shot was AWESOME [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDajL441mZc].
In the context of the movie it's kinda clear that he's managing to keep himself calm (thought people around him aren't sure and think he'll be set off by anything) from things that would anger others, him losing his shit on the Helicarrier is easily explained by extreme stress and panic/anxiety. It's also been shown in his own film (because yay for shared continuity) that Bruce can "guide" the Hulk's rage in a most basic way, sure the Hulk is still a complete idiot, but he's going to attack what he perceives as a threat (and when panicking he's going to lash out at most things, like people are known to do) or an important target. If Banner can control his emotions/anger well enough for this situation (people in real life are known to do this as well, except the Rage Monster part) then he could easily focus all his anger before transforming on the situation at hand and the Hulk, though stupid, is more than capable of differentiating allies (as he has in the past).

This is not a plot hole in any way.
 

Baron_BJ

Tired. Cold. Bored.
Nov 13, 2009
499
0
11
Ranorak said:
As a person interested in comics but by no means the money to collect them all,
I got really interested in this story line,

Any chance someone can mention what issue this arc supposedly starts in?
or what books to pick up?

I feel this might be a good point to get into The Amazing / Superior Spider-man now.
The arc starts at issue 698. Ignore issue #699.1 (not #699 itself because that's a different thing and actually is part of the story) as it's a prelude to an upcoming Morbius comic series.

My opinion is that this is terrible because Ock himself is an unlikable character to begin with (he was meant to be, so huzzah there) who attempted to mass murder 99.92% of the planet and now because he's suddenly had Peter's memories play through his head for maybe 10 seconds (literally) he's a good guy now and I'm meant to like him? No, he's still a complete asshole and the follow up in Avenging Spider-Man confirmed that. He's a colossal shitbag.

I've read pretty much every Spider-Man comic as well though and I have to say that the statement's regarding his deaths are an exaggeration. Yes, he's died before, but only in ways like in "The Other" (which was mentioned, the cocoon thing) where it was obvious that he wasn't dead because it was part of the story line (I don't think that part 4 or so out of a 12 part story is going to end early just to fuck with us).

I've read Slott's entire run as well and I agree that it's good, not the best thing I've ever read but I've had fun and that the story isn't too poorly written until the end where I felt it became fairly contrived and some of the dialogue from the start of the arc turned out to be a Red Herring (The stuff where Peter is wondering why he's willing to take the help of the villains in the break out and how he's meant to be the hero, etc). The biggest problem is that, especially in the follow up in Avenging Spider-Man #15.1, Ock still comes across as a monster who is treating others like garbage and using people. It's in character, but the character is someone who I want incarcerated and tortured, something which is rarely a desirable trait in these sorts of books, especially Spider-Man books.

Finally, with regards to continuity, yes, this will indeed be wiped out because it's a fucking horrible idea. But people say "It'll be retconned out, why do you care?" To which I say "Major retcons are stains that can't wash out". You listed off a few stupid things which have been retconned out, whilst true in a sense they still happened, The clone saga was a gigantic turd that ultimately amounted to nothing but it's still a big part of the character's history and character. It's like if you're watching a movie where a character is driving on an empty road to work, then suddenly gets beamed up into a UFO and anally probed before being sent back in time to the exact moment he was kidnapped with his memory wiped, only to have this never followed up on in the Movie. It ultimately does not affect the rest of the movie at all but as a whole it fucks things up from a story perspective, in the movie someone would go "why the fuck is this here?", in comics people just say "it's comics, deal with it or you're an idiot". Retcons are to be avoided unless absolutely necessary, not just thrown out there randomly, it's stupid crap like this that causes people to talk about how death in comics is meaningless, well this isn't helping! Avoiding major retcons such as what will come from this would over time maybe repair this reputation, make it so people will take it more seriously, get more involved, but if people just want to throw them around for no reason then that won't happen.[/quote]

zombie711 said:
Actually Bob there is a shortage of Peter Parker in comics
Marvel has systematically killed, canceled, or replaced almost every Peter Parker except for Marvel adventures (children comic) and Disney's Ultimate Spider-man (comic based off TV show)

They remain the last Peter Parkers in Comics

As for games, I dunno it been like 2 years since one came out (excluding the movie tie in)

Its a stark contrast to the Ultimate Universe where while I think Ultimate Peter Parker didnt need to die, still went out in a culmination of what made him a hero.

Ultimate Peter went out with a bang. 616 peter went out with a whisper.
And can you be spider-man if your new origin is killing the previous one?
Also this. Ultimate Spider-Man had one of the greatest and most fitting deaths imaginable and was in the end held as a hero by the entire city for what he did when he was just some kid in highschool. 616 dies after saving the entire world? He gets his body stolen by one of the greatest monsters who ever lives who will now go on to fuck the woman he loves (I never notice this sort of shit in media at all but I can't be the only one creeped out by the fact that he's living Peter's life and has decided to pursue MJ, that's like taking someone to bed then, you turn out the lights, get Osama to come into the room and fuck her without her consent and then leave before the lights come back on, this was incredibly disturbing, I know it most likely wasn't Slott's intent but this comes across so Rape-y to me and I've literally never once commented/complained on sexuality in comics, so yeah, this one stood out that much) and rob him of his life, no one even knows, he's left forgotten and unmourned.
 

Baron_BJ

Tired. Cold. Bored.
Nov 13, 2009
499
0
11
Double Posts are bad kids. Triple Posts get you an Unwanted prison-lover named "Big Hank".
 

Phase_9

New member
Oct 18, 2008
436
0
0
My problem is the idea that tragedy is all it takes to be a hero. Because the Doc experience Peter's loss and sadness, now he's a good guy? It's dead wrong. You don't need to have a tragic backstory to be a good hero (see: Booster Gold Pre-Flashpoint). It belittles the things that truly make a hero. Pain and loss have made supervillains far more often than they've made superheroes.
 

TheSchaef

New member
Feb 1, 2008
430
0
0
Baron_BJ said:
TheSchaef said:
Bob makes a point in the end: in the end, it's a geek fantasy where the stories we like are just as implausible as the ones we don't.

See also: The Incredible Hulk, who for the sake of the plot, can now suddenly control his rage without any explanation. Which doesn't matter, cause that shot was AWESOME [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDajL441mZc].
In the context of the movie it's kinda clear yadda yadda on and on about how...

This is not a plot hole in any way.
I'm forced to wonder if there's a point in this reply where you stopped and watched the link in question, realizing that I am not the person who made this claim, and that even the people who made the video loved the movie and thought it was awesome.
 

zombie711

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,505
0
0
leviadragon99 said:
Huh... have to say, I don't understand the uproar either, it does sound like a temporary thing that could turn out pretty interesting if done well.
Temporary in comics useually means a year minimum.
Ben Riley lasted a few years
 

Nghtgnt

New member
May 30, 2010
124
0
0
I doubt Doc Ock will ever have sex with MJ precisely because of the rape implications and also because Marvel has been down this road before with another character (I think it was Chameleon) and they specifically mentioned that he and the female character DIDN'T have sex. So really, it's sad and funny and silly to see people continuously bringing this up and being upset about something that will likely never even happen.

But back to issue 700...

I read it, and thought it was okay. It wasn't the big deus ex machina that OMD was, and I found Peter's final day to have been a rather moving story, especially the part where he sees all of his loved ones who had died.

By the way, for the OMD-haters, while it wasn't necessarily the best-written idea ever your anger is misplaced - be angry instead with the decision to have Spider-Man reveal his identity during Civil War.
 

Baron_BJ

Tired. Cold. Bored.
Nov 13, 2009
499
0
11
TheSchaef said:
Baron_BJ said:
TheSchaef said:
Bob makes a point in the end: in the end, it's a geek fantasy where the stories we like are just as implausible as the ones we don't.

See also: The Incredible Hulk, who for the sake of the plot, can now suddenly control his rage without any explanation. Which doesn't matter, cause that shot was AWESOME [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDajL441mZc].
In the context of the movie it's kinda clear yadda yadda on and on about how...

This is not a plot hole in any way.
I'm forced to wonder if there's a point in this reply where you stopped and watched the link in question, realizing that I am not the person who made this claim, and that even the people who made the video loved the movie and thought it was awesome.
I know, that doesn't change the fact that people keep calling it a plot hole when it isn't. Saying something is stupid but that you like it doesn't change the fact that you were wrong.

It's like when people would say that Frodo not riding the giant eagles is a plot hole in Lord of the Rings. It isn't Sauron's eye is focused on the ring and he would have just told his soldiers whom are heavily stationed there and nearby "Shoot him now", pick the ring up off their lifeless corpses once they hit the ground. People still liking the movie doesn't change the fact that the criticism is wrong.

Nghtgnt said:
I doubt Doc Ock will ever have sex with MJ precisely because of the rape implications and also because Marvel has been down this road before with another character (I think it was Chameleon) and they specifically mentioned that he and the female character DIDN'T have sex. So really, it's sad and funny and silly to see people continuously bringing this up and being upset about something that will likely never even happen.

But back to issue 700...

I read it, and thought it was okay. It wasn't the big deus ex machina that OMD was, and I found Peter's final day to have been a rather moving story, especially the part where he sees all of his loved ones who had died.

By the way, for the OMD-haters, while it wasn't necessarily the best-written idea ever your anger is misplaced - be angry instead with the decision to have Spider-Man reveal his identity during Civil War.
He's already tried to have sex with her and then clearly got very aggressive toward her when she was a bit taken aback by the fact he had the costume underneath. So you're saying that in the long run we may just end up with attempted rape? ...yay?
 

TheSchaef

New member
Feb 1, 2008
430
0
0
Baron_BJ said:
I know, that doesn't change the fact that people keep calling it a plot hole when it isn't. Saying something is stupid but that you like it doesn't change the fact that you were wrong.
IT. WAS. A. JOKE.

God help me.
 

Baron_BJ

Tired. Cold. Bored.
Nov 13, 2009
499
0
11
TheSchaef said:
Baron_BJ said:
I know, that doesn't change the fact that people keep calling it a plot hole when it isn't. Saying something is stupid but that you like it doesn't change the fact that you were wrong.
IT. WAS. A. JOKE.

God help me.
I got the joke. I just don't care. I'm an asshole if you have yet to catch on.
 

TheSchaef

New member
Feb 1, 2008
430
0
0
Baron_BJ said:
I got the joke. I just don't care. I'm an asshole if you have yet to catch on.
Well, at least you're honest about the tendency to arbitrarily destroy other people's capacity to enjoy things. I'm just not sure I see the gain in it.