The definition of irony:Baron_BJ said:I DO IT FOR THE SEXUAL THRILL!
even before seeing this reply, my planned exit from this exchange was going to be: "well, whatever gets your rocks off, I guess."
Pre-cognition!
The definition of irony:Baron_BJ said:I DO IT FOR THE SEXUAL THRILL!
Probably not. Due to new media, comics are struggling to grab our attention. So they've always employed strange tactics. There's whole tropes based around it. "Recycled in SPACE [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RecycledINSPACE]" and so on.Joriss said:Bob should do an episode about a comic that isn't weird...at all!
Wait, is there such a comic?
It would appear that you've won this round man with strange name that sounds like a man with a lisp trying to say "Shave". For now.TheSchaef said:The definition of irony:Baron_BJ said:I DO IT FOR THE SEXUAL THRILL!
even before seeing this reply, my planned exit from this exchange was going to be: "well, whatever gets your rocks off, I guess."
Pre-cognition!
I think that was a jab more at the fanbase than the story.Scarim Coral said:So overall you're not against the changed they did to the character and yet you named the episode title "Stuperior" (from the word stupid right)? I mean I assume you were against it base from the title.
This is also a case of 'the director's cut explains it better,' as his talk with the security guard when he fell, Brain is that you?, is longer and 'deeper.'Baron_BJ said:In the context of the movie it's kinda clear that he's managing to keep himself calm (thought people around him aren't sure and think he'll be set off by anything) from things that would anger others, him losing his shit on the Helicarrier is easily explained by extreme stress and panic/anxiety. It's also been shown in his own film (because yay for shared continuity) that Bruce can "guide" the Hulk's rage in a most basic way, sure the Hulk is still a complete idiot, but he's going to attack what he perceives as a threat (and when panicking he's going to lash out at most things, like people are known to do) or an important target. If Banner can control his emotions/anger well enough for this situation (people in real life are known to do this as well, except the Rage Monster part) then he could easily focus all his anger before transforming on the situation at hand and the Hulk, though stupid, is more than capable of differentiating allies (as he has in the past).TheSchaef said:Bob makes a point in the end: in the end, it's a geek fantasy where the stories we like are just as implausible as the ones we don't.
See also: The Incredible Hulk, who for the sake of the plot, can now suddenly control his rage without any explanation. Which doesn't matter, cause that shot was AWESOME [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDajL441mZc].
This is not a plot hole in any way.
This is important and should be read.KoDOmega said:... whoa.
The actual big bad issue, Bob.
You missed it.
If most people are getting their panties in a twist over Spidey dying, that's fine.
The thing they should ACTUALLY be mad about?
ANYONE, INCLUDING AFOREMENTIONED REDHEADED CIPHER, HAVING A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH SPIDER-MAN.
Basically, Doc HAS to either tell his sexual partners he's actually a reformed supervillain in a superhero's body or else ANYTHING they do could be considered <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_fraud>rape by fraud, a very serious, very real crime that he could very easily perpetrate if he's not careful. Heck, by some definition, ANYTHING he does, regardless of what he tells people, could be considered rape... OF PETER PARKER.
Again, I AGREE with you on the fact that this story has a lot of potential for good, twist-on-the-mythos storytelling. But Doc better keep the pistol in his holster or else Spidey comics are going to get VERY uncomfortable VERY quickly.
As for the issue, now that I've read it since then:To be honest, I think it's stupid. But I don't think it's that bad.
If they just made this the 700th issue and continued with this plot point numbering it 701, I don't think it'd raise quite as much of a stink. We all know the status quo would be restored in time, so instead of the whole "This is the end of Spider-Man!" thing, this could have just been a fun (even if stupid) little story arc. Nothing besides the number and title is changing. There were no retcons, the book is keeping the same writer, and its going to continue on the plot point of the last issue. Superior Spider-Man #1 is Amazing Spider-Man #701 in everything but name.
An attempt at marketing trying to add an air of finality to this kinda has soured the whole idea before it even started. And what's more, it's going to make the inevitable return to the norm seem worse.
Overall, I thought Marvel NOW! was being handled much better than the New 52. It's a shame that it's first real screw-up was something like this.
As for the story itself: Meh. I'll wait for the trade when it eventually comes out.
It was used 6 times not counting your post on the front page.ccdohl said:Escapist forumgoers use the word "interesting" too much.
Sounds cool I guess, but if Parker is brought back just because his memories overtake his body again, will it really be Parker, or just Doc Ock still in Parker's body, but with a memory problem? Peter will remain dead, and his consciousness will be lost.
Meh, I was too lazy to go get the link.gigastar said:Thats why i dont get why the fans are being pissy. If it sucks they can retcon it and if it doesnt they can run with it.canadamus_prime said:Yeah I don't read comic books, but I bet this won't last long before they do the whole mental battle for control thing, Peter will win, and BAM, Peter Parker will be Spider-Man again. Either that or they'll contrive some other way to bring Peter back.
Oh, also...
Thats how you do it.EDIT: You know what? I bet this is simply a case of "They changed it now it sucks. [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheyChangedItNowItSucks]"