Weasker said:
Hey Bob, if you happen to have a list of toppics to discuss in this show, even if you put my suggestion at the bottom of such list, I would really like to hear your point of view between comic books and manga. The good and bad things that come from franchices that never end, go from writer to writer and mostly consist of the so called super hero who gets some power in a very convenient way (cursed with awesome), and franchices created and ended almost always by the same person (or group) and about 50% are "shonen" who have increasingly started to rely on unnecesary underage fanservice.
I think I have yet to hear you talk about manga, don't even really know if you read any. But I heard you talk about some intresting things from Japan so please consider my request.
I'm not well-versed enough in Manga culture to really offer a full opinion on it, but my "broad sense" of it in comparison to American comic culture is that it has different versions of the same problems - i.e. American comics have too many retcons and too much static continuity; but I'm not sure how different that is from the Manga/Anime where, yes, you have "complete stories"... which then get retold with slight variation again and again. That said, I think that the "bulk digest" format of a lot of Manga - i.e. one ginormous magazine featuring multiple continuing series as opposed to multiple seperate monthly books - is the way American comics should be going in the future.
Just to clarify... I really hope this episode doesn't read as "Bob hates Comic Continuity," because that's just about the furthest thing from the the truth. Done WELL, I love the stuff. I'm the quintessential geek who loves continuity and linked-canon and universe-building. I adore the fact that Spider-Man lives in the same world as The X-Men and Ghost-Rider and whoever, that "their" version of Earth is visited by aliens on a near-weekly basis, that if The Punisher goes for a boat ride he may run into someone the race of amphibious Atlanteans living in an undersea soveriegn state while he's out there and that
The Devil is just ONE of HUNDREDS of supernatural figures one can expect to just "bump into" in the day-to-day. Yes, it's also so ABSURD that you can make a comedy video just by
summarizing it, but for me it's a big part of the charm... except when it's not.
The thing is, comic-continuity used to be a BONUS for the reader... and now it's become the sole focus of waaaaay too many books. IMO, that's the real problem. When I first got into comics as a little kid in the 80s, it was because I liked Spider-Man, Batman etc. from cartoons... then I'd read an issue and go
"whoa.. who're all these other guys they hang out with? They have their OWN books? Maybe I should check those out, they seem cool!" or
"Wait... the footnote says this bad guy showed up in such-and-such issue five years ago? WOW! This story is waaaaay more sprawling than I thought, cool!" It made the experience more fun, and the more of it you "got" the more you felt like you "in on" some big awesome secret club.
BUT! The difference was, if you DIDN'T care about that stuff, they still tried to make the book itself worth reading. One issue would still tell a complete short story and the bigger continuity would play itself out in the footnotes and side-moments. You'd get, for example, a complete self-contained main-story where Spider-Man fought and defeated the Villain of The Month; and then in the "side-story" stuff like conversations with the supporting cast or cut-asides to other characters with their own agenda you'd get bits and pieces of whatever the big over-arching story of the time was. Casual readers got a good one-off comic, hardcore fans got massive, sprawling multi-issue "sagas" to follow, everybody wins. That first part doesn't happen anymore, and it leads directly to BAD continuity-focused stuff like what's described in the video.