The Big Picture: Untransformed

Recommended Videos

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Woodsey said:
artanis_neravar said:
Woodsey said:
canadamus_prime said:
This is why you have to lower your expectations and just be thankful for the parts they get right.
Alternatively, don't reward them for making shit films.
But how can you truly know it will be a shit film? Critics aren't always trustworthy when it comes to suggesting movies, lets take Movie Bob for example, I know that if he says a movie was good, then it is probably a must see for me, but if he says it's bad, well that doesn't mean I might not still enjoy it.

I will admit I saw all 3 transformers movies, the first one I went to hopeful, the second one I was paid to go see, and the third one I went to see for the pew pew pew. Going into these I didn't know what type of movie it would be and the only way I could truly find out was going to see it.
So find a critic whose tastes reflect your own, and if the first two films in a trilogy are shit, it should be enough of a clue to not go and see the third one.

I'm sure you're able to exercise some level of judgement as to what a film will be like.
Star Wars Episode III was infinitely better than I and II, so there is always the chance that it could be good. and I've tried there is no critic with the same tastes as me, at least not one that will admit it
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
artanis_neravar said:
Woodsey said:
artanis_neravar said:
Woodsey said:
canadamus_prime said:
This is why you have to lower your expectations and just be thankful for the parts they get right.
Alternatively, don't reward them for making shit films.
But how can you truly know it will be a shit film? Critics aren't always trustworthy when it comes to suggesting movies, lets take Movie Bob for example, I know that if he says a movie was good, then it is probably a must see for me, but if he says it's bad, well that doesn't mean I might not still enjoy it.

I will admit I saw all 3 transformers movies, the first one I went to hopeful, the second one I was paid to go see, and the third one I went to see for the pew pew pew. Going into these I didn't know what type of movie it would be and the only way I could truly find out was going to see it.
So find a critic whose tastes reflect your own, and if the first two films in a trilogy are shit, it should be enough of a clue to not go and see the third one.

I'm sure you're able to exercise some level of judgement as to what a film will be like.
Star Wars Episode III was infinitely better than I and II, so there is always the chance that it could be good. and I've tried there is no critic with the same tastes as me, at least not one that will admit it
Well then I suppose you're stuck going to see every film ever released, just in case.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
Woodsey said:
artanis_neravar said:
Woodsey said:
artanis_neravar said:
Woodsey said:
canadamus_prime said:
This is why you have to lower your expectations and just be thankful for the parts they get right.
Alternatively, don't reward them for making shit films.
But how can you truly know it will be a shit film? Critics aren't always trustworthy when it comes to suggesting movies, lets take Movie Bob for example, I know that if he says a movie was good, then it is probably a must see for me, but if he says it's bad, well that doesn't mean I might not still enjoy it.

I will admit I saw all 3 transformers movies, the first one I went to hopeful, the second one I was paid to go see, and the third one I went to see for the pew pew pew. Going into these I didn't know what type of movie it would be and the only way I could truly find out was going to see it.
So find a critic whose tastes reflect your own, and if the first two films in a trilogy are shit, it should be enough of a clue to not go and see the third one.

I'm sure you're able to exercise some level of judgement as to what a film will be like.
Star Wars Episode III was infinitely better than I and II, so there is always the chance that it could be good. and I've tried there is no critic with the same tastes as me, at least not one that will admit it
Well then I suppose you're stuck going to see every film ever released, just in case.
That was indeed my plan
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
From 2 to 3.. we did get less stupid comedy and more action. Was the stupid comedy gone? No, but we got to see that guy from The Hangover get killed by Laserbeak.

Then there was the action.. which the entire second half of the movie was basically a non-stop action sequence and all I've heard about it is people bitching that it was too much action.

Here's the kicker, all the people who ***** about how dumb the Transformers movies are.. you still paid to go see them. Maybe, just maybe, if you think they're so horrible you should, I dunno, stop going. Is it going to put some huge dent in the box-office gross? Probably not, but who knows and you get the added bonuses of not wasting your time and money on a movie you know going in you're going to hate AND not feeling compelled to make videos about how much you hated that thing you knew you were going to hate and berating the people who liked it.

It's quite simple, if it hurts, don't do it. If it sucks, don't watch it.
 

psiho333

New member
Sep 28, 2009
6
0
0
I wouldn't have gone to the cinema from the 2nd Transformers onwards even if they paid me. Didn't see the second one, but gave the 3rd one a chance on DVD. Couldn't stand watching it to the end. This is just plain ... No. Actually, it's not even worth those words.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,331
0
0
Woodsey said:
canadamus_prime said:
This is why you have to lower your expectations and just be thankful for the parts they get right.
Alternatively, don't reward them for making shit films.
Or that works too. Either way shut up and stop whining, it certainly has no impact on them and only serves to make you and everyone else miserable. And speaking on behalf of the 'everyone else' we don't appreciate it.
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,720
0
0
It's funny you mention Men In Black, Bob, seeing how...no. You already know what I'm going to say, ergo I'm going to stop right here.

Also, I get the whys of Bay helming the Transformers flicks, but that doesn't exactly mean he should let them suck. And yes, I know the screenwriters are just as guilty as Bay is for writing what Bay shot, but that doesn't make it sting any less.
 

SAMAS

New member
Aug 27, 2009
337
0
0
Personally, I liked the first two movies. Some people (Bob, for example) don't like what they did, but I honestly believe they did a good job of what they set out to do.

Dark of the Moon, on the other hand, seemed to fail at that. I think it was mostly a bunch of small changes (Mikaela gone, the guns are hand-held now) that together just broke the continuity to me.
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
The only Transformers background that I had in my infancy was Beast Wars and Beast Machines, so I really don't know the "source material" (aka, the campy 80's cartoon) so I really don't care about what Michael Bay has done with the movies, but, if it counts, I still think they're all pretty "meh", nothing more, nothing less.

I only watched the first movie on TV and I just didn't want to watch the other ones.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
21,024
5,921
118
Woodsey said:
"Grow up."

I was referencing that. Think about it.

"but because Bob didn't find it too bad it's suddenly not worthy of being hated on as much by the general audience."

The point of the video was: "Is The Phantom Menace the film-equivalent of the Anti-Christ, and is it worth 13 years of venomous spite?" The answer - in his opinion, and I'm hoping I don't have to tell you how hard it is for someone to supposedly contradict themself when every single factor in the equation is subjective - was no. He didn't say people should love The Phantom Menace, he said it's not fucking worth it after all this time.

I'd imagine he'd actually say the same for the Transformers films if that were the case. But since Transformers is NOW and since it's making astronomical sums of money NOW and since people are defending this mindless shit NOW, it is worth encouraging people to get up in arms about it.
The thing he keeps going on about in regards to the Transformers movies is how all the people that like it are supossedly retards. Just as his whole hissy fit about The Expendables taking in more money than Scott Pilgrim, and blaming everyone that saw the former in theaters for the downfall of cinema.

When has it become the general assumtion that someone's taste is in direct connection to their inteligence? Bob himself is a rather smart fellow, yet he likes movies such as Sucker Punch. Does that mean he's an idiot who shouldn't be allowed to operate vehicles? No, it means he's a guy who likes the occasional crap film. He's no different from the people who happen to like the Transformers movies.
 

him over there

New member
Dec 17, 2011
1,728
0
0
Alright I have never watched any of the transformers movies. Just a disclaimer.

I just want to say that not following the canon isn't a bad thing, the fact that a movie has no semblance of quality or effort makes it suck. The movies were an adaption, you know what that means? It means that it has a differnt audience and a different intention so it is adapted for other audiences and cultures. Transformers was for little kids and nerds, if they wanted to make money then they probably would try to market to a larger audience. So strip out the intricate canon but keep the culturally iconic characters and gimmicks plus a slight modernization will bring people, guaranteed. That's fine, just make sure that it's a quality movie.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Woodsey said:
"Grow up."

I was referencing that. Think about it.

"but because Bob didn't find it too bad it's suddenly not worthy of being hated on as much by the general audience."

The point of the video was: "Is The Phantom Menace the film-equivalent of the Anti-Christ, and is it worth 13 years of venomous spite?" The answer - in his opinion, and I'm hoping I don't have to tell you how hard it is for someone to supposedly contradict themself when every single factor in the equation is subjective - was no. He didn't say people should love The Phantom Menace, he said it's not fucking worth it after all this time.

I'd imagine he'd actually say the same for the Transformers films if that were the case. But since Transformers is NOW and since it's making astronomical sums of money NOW and since people are defending this mindless shit NOW, it is worth encouraging people to get up in arms about it.
The thing he keeps going on about in regards to the Transformers movies is how all the people that like it are supossedly retards. Just as his whole hissy fit about The Expendables taking in more money than Scott Pilgrim, and blaming everyone that saw the former in theaters for the downfall of cinema.

When has it become the general assumtion that someone's taste is in direct connection to their inteligence? Bob himself is a rather smart fellow, yet he likes movies such as Sucker Punch. Does that mean he's an idiot who shouldn't be allowed to operate vehicles? No, it means he's a guy who likes the occasional crap film. He's no different from the people who happen to like the Transformers movies.
Ah but Sucker Punch is different and quirky and alternative and whatnot. Therefore it's great!

C'mon dude, we all know that the best films out there are the ones Bob likes and the ones that he doesn't like must be total shit.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Woodsey said:
"Grow up."

I was referencing that. Think about it.

"but because Bob didn't find it too bad it's suddenly not worthy of being hated on as much by the general audience."

The point of the video was: "Is The Phantom Menace the film-equivalent of the Anti-Christ, and is it worth 13 years of venomous spite?" The answer - in his opinion, and I'm hoping I don't have to tell you how hard it is for someone to supposedly contradict themself when every single factor in the equation is subjective - was no. He didn't say people should love The Phantom Menace, he said it's not fucking worth it after all this time.

I'd imagine he'd actually say the same for the Transformers films if that were the case. But since Transformers is NOW and since it's making astronomical sums of money NOW and since people are defending this mindless shit NOW, it is worth encouraging people to get up in arms about it.
The thing he keeps going on about in regards to the Transformers movies is how all the people that like it are supossedly retards. Just as his whole hissy fit about The Expendables taking in more money than Scott Pilgrim, and blaming everyone that saw the former in theaters for the downfall of cinema.

When has it become the general assumtion that someone's taste is in direct connection to their inteligence? Bob himself is a rather smart fellow, yet he likes movies such as Sucker Punch. Does that mean he's an idiot who shouldn't be allowed to operate vehicles? No, it means he's a guy who likes the occasional crap film. He's no different from the people who happen to like the Transformers movies.
Referring to people en masse is not the same as picking out individuals; this is not a difficult concept to grasp. He didn't address you personally and call you a stupid twat for liking Transformers. He is talking about the average movie-going audience who'll go off to see other stuff just like it, and swallow whatever shit they're fed.

Furthermore, there is a difference between liking a film that most people do not like and actually defending it, compared to the sort of defence the Transformers films (and their ilk) usually get. Namely, the "just leave your brain at the door argument" (and variations thereof) - a defence for which all who speak it should be executed.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
21,024
5,921
118
anthony87 said:
Casual Shinji said:
Woodsey said:
"Grow up."

I was referencing that. Think about it.

"but because Bob didn't find it too bad it's suddenly not worthy of being hated on as much by the general audience."

The point of the video was: "Is The Phantom Menace the film-equivalent of the Anti-Christ, and is it worth 13 years of venomous spite?" The answer - in his opinion, and I'm hoping I don't have to tell you how hard it is for someone to supposedly contradict themself when every single factor in the equation is subjective - was no. He didn't say people should love The Phantom Menace, he said it's not fucking worth it after all this time.

I'd imagine he'd actually say the same for the Transformers films if that were the case. But since Transformers is NOW and since it's making astronomical sums of money NOW and since people are defending this mindless shit NOW, it is worth encouraging people to get up in arms about it.
The thing he keeps going on about in regards to the Transformers movies is how all the people that like it are supossedly retards. Just as his whole hissy fit about The Expendables taking in more money than Scott Pilgrim, and blaming everyone that saw the former in theaters for the downfall of cinema.

When has it become the general assumtion that someone's taste is in direct connection to their inteligence? Bob himself is a rather smart fellow, yet he likes movies such as Sucker Punch. Does that mean he's an idiot who shouldn't be allowed to operate vehicles? No, it means he's a guy who likes the occasional crap film. He's no different from the people who happen to like the Transformers movies.
Ah but Sucker Punch is different and quirky and alternative and whatnot. Therefore it's great!

C'mon dude, we all know that the best films out there are the ones Bob likes and the ones that he doesn't like must be total shit.
Thing is, I don't mind if he says something like that. If I think a movie is terrible, I'll call it out on being shit, too.

But I'm not going call everyone who likes said shitty film a braindead bottomfeeder. And it always makes me break out in hives whenever I hear Bob talking like that. Everyone has movies they like that aren't particularly good, that doesn't make you stupid.
 

Triality

New member
May 9, 2011
134
0
0
Post edited because I am a leap-first idiot. But still, 40 year old Harley Quinn... what's the emoticon for vomit?
 

El Luck

New member
Jul 22, 2011
312
0
0
Shoulda realised that this would have probably ended up a "stop liking what I don't like" episode. Ah well, my bad.
 

ewhac

Digital Spellweaver
Legacy
Escapist +
Sep 2, 2009
575
0
21
San Francisco Peninsula
Country
USA
Triality said:
Wait a damn minute. Madonna - who played as Cat Woman [ ... ]
Uh, since when? Apparently Madonna auditioned for the role, but it was Michelle Pfeiffer who ended up in the film.

BTW, Bob:

Most of the audience, at least judging by the box office, just seems to want to watch generically attractive non-actors dive out of the way of gasoline pyro-fireballs while tossing off monosyllabic one-liners as background noise for their weekend popcorn binge intermittently interrupted by a volley of texting.
Dunno why, but I quite like this line.
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
I stand proud and tall in my claim that I have never gone to any of these movies in theaters and that I have not seen any of them except the first (which I watched out of morbid curiosity because my mom had already bought the DVD; I am ashamed of this).