Actually the "bullet proof" helmet is pure fiction. Your average military helmet won't even stop a standard 7.62 round if it hits dead on, and our friendly Canadian is using a 50 cal. So, no, the helmet probably wouldn't stop it, and if it did, the bullet would probably knock his head off anyway.Namechangeday said:Um... sniper rifles can shoot through helmets now? I thought militaries these days had better equipment than that. Unless they are out of the resources needed for bullet-proof helms or we just have bullets that make the word bullet-proof non-existant.
I find it pretty hilarious that you're always trying to shut down anyone who calls out your nonsense by calling people politically correct anti-US revisionists. LITERALLY no one in this thread had mentioned white people massacring native americans yet you bring that up like it proves your point that no damn 'libruls' can face the hard truth that white people aren't as awful as you claim we claim they are.Therumancer said:snip
Grey Carter said:snipe
Makes sense, didn't know. Thanks !BlackStar42 said:snip
If you are being serious then the war of 1812 was a fight between British and American forces. Canadians were still British and sailed a group of ships into American territory and bombarded DC ending in the White House being destroyed. American forces pushed into Canada (again, we did the same thing in the Revolutionary War) as far as Toronto.Vault Citizen said:I recall learning if an event in history similar to this, I don't know the exact details I just remember hearing the words, British, White House and burnt to the ground.
Correction: we have transeuranic apology rifles. We kill our enemies with our irrational inferiority complex.Draconalis said:Canadians have sniper rifles?!
Yes we do.. and the bullets they fire are made of frozen maple syrup.Draconalis said:Canadians have sniper rifles?!
Actually the current record holder is a British Corporal. Though it did take him 9 shots to properly range the target and the only 45m less record for the Canadian was done in 3 shots.MarsAtlas said:Yes. In fact, the world record holder for the longest confirmed kill against a human combatant (or a human, for that matter), is a Canadian, a 1.54 miles, which is about 2.5 kilometers.
The "sorry" after the Canadian does a headshot on the American soldier. We're notorious for being polite at the strangest of times.WanderingFool said:Kay... I dont get it... Theres something funny here, I know, but Im not sure what it is...
Yeah it was couple of years ago iirc. To be fair to the brit though his rifle wasn't considered nearly accurate enough for the range he pulled the shot off with.MarsAtlas said:That must've been recent then, because I recall the Canadian still being the holder sometime last year. I remember reading about the Canadian right after it happened on a website. I wanna say he used an AWM, but there's a good chance I'm off on that. I'm absolutely certain, however, that he actually took out two guys, not just one. Hit them both in the gut. If not, we must be talking about different Canadians.Slycne said:Actually the current record holder is a British Corporal. Though it did take him 9 shots to properly range the target and the only 45m less record for the Canadian was done in 3 shots.MarsAtlas said:Yes. In fact, the world record holder for the longest confirmed kill against a human combatant (or a human, for that matter), is a Canadian, a 1.54 miles, which is about 2.5 kilometers.