No. I also own a Dreamcast. I had a 360, but my brother took it. I plan on getting a new one soon, and possibly a PS3 when Heavy Rain comes out.Reuq said:Is Wii your only console?DrDeath3191 said:Okay then. Have fun!Reuq said:Its not how great other controllers are, for me its what the Wii dosen't offer that is a shame. Ill stick with a mouse and keyboard for now.DrDeath3191 said:So since pushing a button hardly relates tothe action it pertains to, that means that Button control does not exist, and that any controller ever concieved fails? I'm not sure I follow your logic.Reuq said:You flick your wrist and something unrelated happens on screen, its not even close to motion control, and is therefore not a good controller. If it was expensive and 1:1 then it would be fine.DrDeath3191 said:It does work. Quite well, actually. I shake the controller, and a response happens on screen. I use motion to control the game. Motion control. Yes, it would have been nice to have 1:1 at the start, but that would have driven the price of the console to astronomical hieghts.Reuq said:Ahhh, fanboy alert. If they are going to release motion control then it better bloody work, thats like saying that Xbox never acctually promised better graphics, they didn't but it is a given, it should be there.DrDeath3191 said:No it doesn't. Nintendo never stated that the Wii remote was a 1:1 motion device. It was never claimed as one, except by wishful dreamers of the media. All they said was "Hey, if you move the controller, it does stuff!" That's precisely what it did.Reuq said:but really the Wii is the worst purly because it lies about what it does.
And I'm not talking like the $20 it costs to get a Wii Motion+ now. I mean a triple digit increase in price.