It was on the front page for a week.Fijiman said:When the hell were we supposed to vote? Why did no one tell me about this?
It was on the front page for a week.Fijiman said:When the hell were we supposed to vote? Why did no one tell me about this?
Sixth place. Not bad considering the top five are all cross platform.BehattedWanderer said:It's okay, Journey, we all still love you. There were just other games that were amazing as well.
Well that would explain why I didn't see anything about it. I rarely am on the front page long enough to see anything like that. Although one would think that a general message would have been sent out or something.Eric the Orange said:It was on the front page for a week.Fijiman said:When the hell were we supposed to vote? Why did no one tell me about this?
By your account, only a minority enjoyed any of these games. This is rather a look at who enjoyed each game more, and a narrow lead goes to ME3.PirateRose said:14% is not much of a win. That means 86% of the people voted for something else. I knew there would be an issue like this, with so many options they threw into this thing, it was far too spread out. If it had been something like over 50% of the votes, then I'd say ME3 truly won, but this isn't a win at all.
It's a minority that enjoyed the game.
It'll be on his little rant of a blog soon enough. Kind of surprised that ME3 won, given all the complaints it had.Fappy said:This thread would be on page 5 by now if Zeel was still around. I'm actually surprised ME3 came out on top in this community.Blunderboy said:Quick, someone get Zeel back!
I've got to say, though I voted for Far Cry 3, I'm pleased ME3 won. I enjoyed the hell out of that game.
Plus now that I've got X-Com, I really want someone to make a ME version.
Murmillos said:ME3 for the most part is a good game, but when you have a horrendously botched ending, that should have excluded it as GOTY.
No, its just not a bad ending, its a horrendously botched ending.
Again, the polls made during the controversy proved that there was a majority of people that did not mind the ending, which if you compare it to the number of people who commented (that hated the ending) shows that the people who hated it felt much more compelled to express their outrage than those who didn't.Machine Man 1992 said:Proof please. Otherwise, dispense with this "silent majority" nonsense.Hyper-space said:People often tend to forget that it was mostly a very, very vocal minority that whined over ME3. I remember when people were making polls, during the shitstorm, on whether people liked the game or or not, the majority opinion was always very positive, despite the campaign of some people to prove otherwise.
Just because someone couldn't be arsed to ***** about it online doesn't mean they were fine with it.
well the og plot was that dark energy was destroying the universe and somehow all the gate travel and etc was run on dark energy and etc, either way the original story plot fell apart the minute people started digging through the codex and saying hey everything in me is run on dark energy how the hell does destroying everyone solve that if all the gates and etc ran on it?j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:The problem isn't just the ending itself. If the ending was a 15 minute side-plot that had no bearing on the main jist of the main narrative arc, then yes you would be correct.cerebus23 said:Murmillos said:ME3 for the most part is a good game, but when you have a horrendously botched ending, that should have excluded it as GOTY.
No, its just not a bad ending, its a horrendously botched ending.
I tend to let people choose what they want, and i think i like many other forget how great a game me3 was up until the very end, so if 90 95% of the game is brilliant imo, and the last 15 minutes is omfg bad, it still should be considered. Yes the ending was so bad not played any of the dlc sofar.....shoot me. but i do recall up until the death run how awesome that game was, especially for mordrin and grunt and wrex.
As it stands, however, the last 10-15 minutes of ME3 is where Casey Hudson and Mac Walters tried to explain everything that happened regarding the Reapers across the previous 3 games. This is the Bioware revealed the canonical explanation for why everything has happened thus far. And it sucks. The explanation is absolutely terrible. So not only does that undermine Mass Effect 3, it undermines every single part of the Mass Effect story which is dependent on the Reapers as a plot device.
Remember during Mass Effect 1, when it's starting to become clear to everyone that the Reapers are a threat, and they need to try and figure out what it is they're planning?
Remember the speech with Harbinger in ME1, where he's all "You cannot comprehend what it is we're doing, because we're so far above you, mwa ha ha!"?
Remember at the start of Mass Effect 2, where the Illusive Man shanghais you into joining Cerberus because they're the ones who stand the best chance of finding out what the Reapers are after?
The basic reasoning for the entire story of the trilogy was revealed in ME3, and it was beyond terrible. Therefore, the shitty quality of ME3's ending does go beyond the mere 10-15 minute timespace it occupies, and actually negatively impacts the rest of the series. Because whenever you play any of the games in the series now, you're going to know that the entire reason for anything happening in any of the games is:
Fair enough there are more things in game that the extended cut changes though, two things that I have a problem with are:IronMit said:Thanks lol.. I know the post wasn't directed at me but i feel like replyingWarachia said:He's saying if suddenly, right when Luke confronts the emperor, the emperor shows him that the empire created several utopias and the darkside was a necessary evil, and he'll stop using it once the rebels are gone, you know, things that make no sense and don't hold up when put into context.Vault101 said:I'm not sure what your sayin ghere
That aside I really liked the extended cut, you should try it if you hated the original ending.
I watched the endings and additional scenes on youtube myself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NNUImNL9Ok
This video sums up what some people think of the endings
I will add;
1.My assets still didn't directly affect the battle- apart from 2x2 different mini cutscenes
2.My assets only affected what I could select at the end
3.Deus ex machina throughout the entire game...no ending re-do could fix this
4.The order-chaos explanation was not changed. It couldn't be..they would have to undo the cut and paste forshadowing of this from ME3. (rannoch reaper and vendetta)
5.citadel was still captured and got to earth off screen
6. They spent 3games changing my opinion about synthetics just to tell me they were right the first time...something tells me they made up this ending out of the blue- you don't even have to read the Drew interviews and haestrom sun forshadowing
All the new ending did for me was to explain exactly what they meant by something that is lore breaking
yh i'm still bitter! lol