Sometimes its just brilliant fun - sometimes even just to watch!Artemis923 said:People's opinions on the internet in regards to religion aren't worth a mummer's fart. Therefore, why people get in titanic flame wars about the subject is beyond me.
Sometimes its just brilliant fun - sometimes even just to watch!Artemis923 said:People's opinions on the internet in regards to religion aren't worth a mummer's fart. Therefore, why people get in titanic flame wars about the subject is beyond me.
No. You can't choose to either be religious or not to be religious; you believe what seems most likely to be true. Yuo can't believe there is a God when as far as you know it's proven beyond doubt that He's nonexistent, and if you've seen something which to you proves that God is real, you cannot choose not to belive in something wich to you is proven to be true.LooK iTz Jinjo said:I don't think the term "breeds" is the right one. Anyone who is atheist is so by choice, hopefully based on experience and some research, rather than to just spite school or parents.
1)I dont think it is, i think that it is the most irritating thing in the world. Its as bad as the over zealous preachers who hound you for not believing them and even shames their fellow Christians.DoW Lowen said:1) Being anti-religious and abrasive is way f***ing funnier than being spiritual.
2) This is a generalization, but those who would view themselves as devout would generally not go to a place such as a forum as they tend to have more... "colorful" characters.
3) The Christians are all in hiding and they are just too fearful of being flamed for their beliefs.
4) I'm just looking in the wrong place
5) We all actually died a long time ago and God sent us to hell and now we are cursed with an insatiable desire to post our opinions on the internet. Whereas the faithful are all up in heaven, on clouds listening to Switchfoot and surrounded by virgin super model choir girls.
Also please don't start a flame war. Can we not be civilized enough to converse like gentlemen/gentleladies?
You can choose to be religeous or non religeous regardless of what is proven. People change their beliefs all the time - even the church of england changed their view on darwinism saying it was "God's Plan".Queen Michael said:No. You can't choose to either be religious or not to be religious; you believe what seems most likely to be true. Yuo can't believe there is a God when as far as you know it's proven beyond doubt that He's nonexistent, and if you've seen something which to you proves that God is real, you cannot choose not to belive in something wich to you is proven to be true.LooK iTz Jinjo said:I don't think the term "breeds" is the right one. Anyone who is atheist is so by choice, hopefully based on experience and some research, rather than to just spite school or parents.
While I agree with many of your points I think that shouting their beliefs to the world is inconsiderate to those who don't want christianity spouted at them. By all means praise away but I despise it when people chase me down the street trying to get me to listen to their preaching.Inconsistancies Arise said:1)I dont think it is, i think that it is the most irritating thing in the world. Its as bad as the over zealous preachers who hound you for not believing them and even shames their fellow Christians.DoW Lowen said:SNIP
2)I say, if your Christian, be proud and don't give a toss what the randoms on the internet think if they don't like it.
3)I've got three increadibly Christian friends who would shout it to the world if they could, they love it. So why should i stop em or hate em?
4)Keep looking, my friend, and you find that community.
5)I wouldn't doubt that, and it would turn most of my atheist friends Christian quickly if it were proven.
People will start a flame war, because some are not mature enough to be considerate of others personal beliefs. But then again, the ones who do react saying 'no religion is for the weak. etc' can just leave now.
Oh, and i am not christian. Agnostic. But im perfectly fine with anything really and just hate the disrespect that occurs so frequently.
Neither do i, but i was more pointing out that they shout it out as a pride thing rather than a 'you should be christian' thing. Like some PC gamers saying that they are proud to be that way but don't say that it is the greatest thing ever and that everyone else sucks cause they don't agree.Jirlond said:While I agree with many of your points I think that shouting their beliefs to the world is inconsiderate to those who don't want christianity spouted at them. By all means praise away but I despise it when people chase me down the street trying to get me to listen to their preaching.
Such as a shame that admitting an belief is generally more offensive than kicking the balls of the guy who believes it. Or girl, I would say vagina but I'm childish.... ehehehe - vagina.naab said:It's not that being abrasive or a jackass is funnier. It's just more accepted, if you run around praising jesus you will immediately be seen as someone who's forcing it down people's throat, labeled as such and then flamed till you finally go to hell.
Kind of a double edge sword don't you think? Sure ideas spread around, and some of them are good, but the internet at the same time manages to ooze an excessive amount of bile and stupidity. I wouldn't really say it is reason, just ideas and some ideas are terrible.samaritan.squirrel said:Couldn't put it better than this guy. In such a technological age, using such an uncontrollable age, reason is going to spread.Skeleon said:The Age of Enlightenment marked the first serious decrease in religious belief, as new rational and scientific theories started to arise and science actually became independent.
I'm not saying that the internet is our Age of Enlightenment, but it does provide information to a very, very broad range of people. Thus, knowledge (not just porn) is distributed farther and farther than ever before. And knowledge leads to the decline of religion.
As for your first point, I've been an atheist all my life, I didn't choose to be one because it's "funnier".
Still even anonymously, people have a need to be liked. I've seen people I've known in real life and seen them on forums as a different person. Perhaps #3 isn't quite right, you'd think with the identity mask of the net, people would be screaming their deepest beliefs and secrets left-right and center. I agree that if you truly believe something you should stand up for it, but sometimes it's easier for a person to shut up and not deal with pointless arguments. Really in the end though, I don't see the need to argue with people over beliefs, the most important arguments are with yourself.Borrowed Time said:Flame away on me. =) 100% Christian here. I've actually been pleasantly surprised with the lack of flaming on this site. Yes, I'm still a fairly new member, but I've made it known in many posts my beliefs and have yet to be attacked for them.
Then again I'm not the kind of Christian to sit there and throw the Bible at you while shaking my finger either. :shrug: Although I do find #3 to be quite sad. No matter what you believe, be it a religion, agnostic or atheist, stand up for your belief. If you won't, then who will? Gold only comes out more pure when it's put through the fire.
Perhaps "breeding ground" would be a better choice. And many atheists are there by choice, but not necessarily through research and experience. Some simply.... don't like the way churches are run, and they feel that denouncing the church is the same as denouncing a higher being. When down inside I think everybody at the very least WANTS to believe in something more. So perhaps people are more agnostic?LooK iTz Jinjo said:I don't think the term "breeds" is the right one. Anyone who is atheist is so by choice, hopefully based on experience and some research, rather than to just spite school or parents.
Not OT, but thought I'd comment. Charity is contextual and circumstantial. When the tsunami's hit Asia, charity from around the world helped immensely. When governments gave Africa billions of dollars to help them out, the government there instead lived in luxury and oppressed the people beneath them into killing each other over working toilets. Economy shouldn't be taken into account, because if the economy should never be taken at face value, not many people would agree but charity is used to established a country's economy and allow more intervention from other countries.Queen Michael said:Please elaborate. It'd be better to be reliant on charity to survive than not being able to survive, right? I mean, either you give them bread so they have to rely on the bread you give them, or you don't give them any bread and they die of starvation. Or did I miss something? (Cuz it's fully possible I did, I'm no expert.)Archaeology Hat said:Poorly organized charity can be fairly damageing to a country. Simply dumping aid on people can cause them to become reliant on the aid at the detriment of their economy. I'm not saying religious charities are the only ones who do this, I'm saying charity isn't as wholly positive as it first seems.Queen Michael said:Here, you're free to ignore the good things, like charity, that religions have contributed to the world.
Ahh ok - well im with you! There will always be ignorance on all sides - its just the way things have been and always will be. It would be nice if there wasnt.Inconsistancies Arise said:Neither do i, but i was more pointing out that they shout it out as a pride thing rather than a 'you should be christian' thing. Like some PC gamers saying that they are proud to be that way but don't say that it is the greatest thing ever and that everyone else sucks cause they don't agree.Jirlond said:While I agree with many of your points I think that shouting their beliefs to the world is inconsiderate to those who don't want christianity spouted at them. By all means praise away but I despise it when people chase me down the street trying to get me to listen to their preaching.
yup, its the way society works.DoW Lowen said:Such as a shame that admitting an belief is generally more offensive than kicking the balls of the guy who believes it. Or girl, I would say vagina but I'm childish.... ehehehe - vagina.naab said:It's not that being abrasive or a jackass is funnier. It's just more accepted, if you run around praising jesus you will immediately be seen as someone who's forcing it down people's throat, labeled as such and then flamed till you finally go to hell.