The Last Thing We Need is Developers Policing Mods

Je-Tze

New member
Aug 26, 2009
16
0
0
Kind of a pointless article. You don't even mention the crux of the situation. Paradox wasn't policing mods, they were policing THEIR own Steam Workshop portal. The ability of the mod maker to make and post the mod ANYWHERE else were not affected. Nor was that ever Paradox's intent.
 

Recusant

New member
Nov 4, 2014
699
0
0
I'm not familiar with how developer control over their Steam interface works- was Paradox capable of just having the comments deleted?
 

Bedinsis

Elite Member
Legacy
Escapist +
May 29, 2014
1,447
714
118
Country
Sweden
I investigated somewhat. According to Paradox employees at Reddit the issue was the mod description, which apparently promoted an agenda they didn't want to be associated with:

Paradox Wikis Admin said:
We saw the mod, thought it wasn't in very good taste, but let it remain. Then the creator of the mod decided to update the description of the mod to promote an "agenda" not related to computer games at all, and this was being clearly displayed on our product page. We decided it was a step too far and removed it. Eurogamer did not do a good job describing what exactly it was we removed.
Source:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Stellaris/comments/4ktt2l/paradox_pulls_discriminatory_stellaris_mod_that/
 

infohippie

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,369
0
0
Something Amyss said:
You don't have an unlimited right to host things on Steam's workshop. If this is what people think harms the modding scene...

...I got nothing. I mean, this sounds like another thinly-wrapped "freeze peach" argument. At the point that "white people only" mods are now vital to the community, it should be a sign that it's time for self-reflection.
You're missing the point. It's not about the content of any particular mod, it's the question of whether we want developers policing the mods for their games and this article has provided some good arguments as to why this might be a bad idea.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
I'd rather they spend more thought on developing their code than watching others. Let the publishers go litigious if things are provably damaging sales.
 

shrekfan246

Not actually a Japanese pop star
May 26, 2011
6,374
0
0
So, where are all of the people championing Paradox's right to defend their artistic vision?

First of all, all they did was remove the thing from the Steam workshop. It was still available and rather easy to find. As far as I'm aware, they're not required to host literally anything that the community comes out with on their official Steam store page. Second, given how readily available the mod always has been, would someone like to explain how this is any more stifling to the modding community than, say, issuing copyright takedowns for material that isn't owned by the modder?
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,337
6,844
118
Country
United States
So, let me get this straight: Paradox removing a mod who's description had white supremist dog whistles and a link to a YouTube channel with that standard Neo-Nazi "multi-culturalism is bad because white genocide" rhetoric is bad because...?

They thought it was in bad taste, but allowed it to stay up before that happened. They're more policing their game's reputation than it's mod content.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
infohippie said:
You're missing the point. It's not about the content of any particular mod, it's the question of whether we want developers policing the mods for their games
Except that's not what happened, and nobody seems to have done their homework on it. The mod was removed from their Workshop page, and specifically because the developers linked to their White Power YouTube channel. That's it. Nothing about this is curating mods, as the mod, Nazis and all, was still available literally anywhere else that chose to host it.

The devs aren't policing mods for their games. That's outright false. When people are up in arms about a given instance, and it's a false one, it's not missing the point to point out it's false. This is being used as a case for the argument. It was literally given as an example within the article. Unfortunately, it's not really...true.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
shrekfan246 said:
So, where are all of the people championing Paradox's right to defend their artistic vision?
Dumb as I think the usual internet outrage defending Nazis and their hate speech is, this is probably a bad argument since we're talking aftermarket modifications. Their original vision is intact.

Though I have no doubt if the opposite were the case, this would be an argument.

altnameJag said:
So, let me get this straight: Paradox removing a mod who's description had white supremist dog whistles and a link to a YouTube channel with that standard Neo-Nazi "multi-culturalism is bad because white genocide" rhetoric is bad because...?
More to the point, the mod is still available. And then was restored, evidently without the links.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
While I do agree with the article in spirit, in that I think it can get out of hand if devs start taking mods down because they can, but, in this case?

I'm totally fine with them doing it.

From what I can gather the mod in question had some white supremacy shit attached to it, and that's really not okay. The devs just want to keep their game from these sort of mods that create an atmosphere of exclusion, and promote nasty ideologies.

So yeah, I don't think the devs did anything wrong, and I guess the mod is still available somewhere. So, happy day for those people, I guess. :/
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
8,706
2,886
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Okay, so in the EULA for Steam, it is clear that you never own the game you purchased.

Paradox would need some permission from Steam to get in removed from the Workshop. You, the consumer, can complain all you want but you don't own Steam, the Workshop, the game, the community page or the mod. You don't get a choice in this matter, except to complain or not.

So maybe, if you really want something changed, you should attack the source of the problem not the result
 

Grumpy Ginger

New member
Jul 9, 2012
85
0
0
I don't really use steam workshop mods but people if you are ever so desperate to make sure that there are only lily white people in space then couldn't the modders just put it somewhere else. By way of analogy if you went to a store and bought a book the publisher would be a little unhappy if at the counter you had the option of adding a white supremacist fanfic to it for free. It implies the publisher condones the content. They could care less if you read it online from an unconnected source.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Terminalchaos said:
One of the points others have made to keep the mod was that were many other single race only mods out already. Including a different white people only mod. If there is a "black people only" and an "only asian mod," then a white only mod is just as appropriate. If you have an issue with single race mods, then I can see a possible angle. If you have an issue with the white people only mod but none of the other racial exclusion mods, then we encroach on the land of hypocrisy.
Except that's not what the issue was, and you claim to know it.

I understand why it was pulled and I'm glad they put it back after it was fixed. I couldn't ever see the need to use that mod, but glad it exists for those that wish to enjoy it.
Yeah, it's almost like this mod was singled out for a reason. That's not hypocrisy, and you claim to understand why it was pulled, so why claim otherwise?

Except they didn't touch the black or asian only mods.
Which of those mods linked to white supremacist YouTube channels?

Grumpy Ginger said:
I don't really use steam workshop mods but people if you are ever so desperate to make sure that there are only lily white people in space then couldn't the modders just put it somewhere else.
They already had. It was already available elsewhere and remained so. And other people managed to have whites-only mods up at the time this was pulled.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
slo said:
Nothing new. The thought of someone policing fantasies still stays disturbing. As are people who think that everyone should thought-policed because their political agenda is that important.

weirdee said:
While we're slipping in attacks on each other's characters on racism, if you wanted to play a game where everybody's white, I invite you to go to any number of game stores and just sweep your arms across the aisle. You can have your pick of any title that has fallen on the floor.
a) "white" is a racist term b) there are other countries than america in the world and c) maybe don't tell people which games to play, m-kay?
Three for three on that strawman. It's almost as if you were trying to make points directed at me.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Terminalchaos said:
The issue I have is people saying "white only mod" is so racist, but avoiding comments on the other racist "african only" and "asian only" mods.
That's fine. Just stop replying to me, then. I have not only spoken to the core of the issue here being the links, but I've clarified it twice. My original post dealt mostly with the idea that there was no right or guarantee for a third party to hose your mod. The only time I said "whites only" in that was to make the argument that if that was what was considered integral, or worth kicking this off, we're in pretty bad shape.

And then you did the same thing with Fiz, who explicitly in the text you quoted brings up specifically the links. It didn't stop you from making the "there are Asian-only mods, too" argument, even though your own quote displays that you at least should know that's not what she's saying.

Do you have anything relevant to say to me?

Because I don't care what other hypothetical people are saying.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
Terminalchaos said:
Fiz_The_Toaster said:
While I do agree with the article in spirit, in that I think it can get out of hand if devs start taking mods down because they can, but, in this case?

I'm totally fine with them doing it.

From what I can gather the mod in question had some white supremacy shit attached to it, and that's really not okay. The devs just want to keep their game from these sort of mods that create an atmosphere of exclusion, and promote nasty ideologies.

So yeah, I don't think the devs did anything wrong, and I guess the mod is still available somewhere. So, happy day for those people, I guess. :/
Except they didn't touch the black or asian only mods. If you're against exclusion, then you should make it consistent. The link to other sites and crap was the big issue and they were right to pull for that. They were also right to put it back up once that was solved. That or pull all race exclusion mods.
To my knowledge, those other mods aren't going "fuck whitey, be Asian/Black/Hispanic instead!"

Basically, they aren't being pulled because of being bigoted. If they were doing the same thing as the one that was pulled then, yeah, I would call hypocrisy. But that's not the case. With regards to the other mods, they're pretty benign. If they are there for aesthetics and nothing more then that's fine. Who cares.

It's the intent behind the mod that matters, and I think the devs did the right thing.