"bad" is not a terms applied to one gender in a sexist way. And yes, bad is quite useless criticism, if you asked for advice on how to write better chracters you are simply told "don't make them so bad" that is useless. It's also impossible to discuss.szaleniec1000 said:That's bullshit. You might as well say that "bad" is a pointless label because what one person considers bad another might not.
Look at TVTropes compendium of characteristics of Mary Sue. I said here (the bit in the spoiler box) what a double standard the Mary Sue definitions are.I've seen far more Sues who don't follow the monomyth than do, and plenty of female protagonists who aren't Sues by anyone's definition, so I don't know where that came from. It's the only remotely original part of your argument, too - you did see the date stamp on that journal entry, right?The reality is the Mary Sue label is essentially used for ANY female character who pretty much follows the campbell type monomyth. The monomyth reserved for MALE protagonists.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.328717.13405992
Soooo, are you confessing to being a troll?Thanks for, if anything, making me *less* hesitant to use it.It's nothing but a slur of no real critical value. Don't use it.![]()
If it is only insulting and has no value of discussion then that is trolling. I can deal with trolls, but ignorant people...
Nice cutting off my response where I DID REMIND YOU that I said:Nice goalpost shifting there. You said that nobody had called Edward a Gary Stu. I linked to an article calling Edward a Gary Stu. You were wrong.And the number of hits for "Bella Swan Mary Sue": 276,000 resultsExcept perhaps here [http://brooketaylorbooks.blogspot.com/2009/01/is-edward-gary-stu.html], which was only the first of 35,200 Google hits for "Edward Cullen Gary Stu" without quotes.Treblaine said:Has that Vampire from Twilight ever been called a Marty Sue? Nope.![]()
So only about 8x as prevalent... if we are following your standard that number of Google results is a measure of anything.
"I DID say that Mary Sue was far more used than Gary Stu/etc and even your particular example is just an over-flow from a Mary Sue "litmus test". This is hardly the most damning critique and already authors ARE avoiding writing female characters to avoid the Mary Sue label and have no fear of the obscure "Gary Stu" label nor their derivatives. Also you get 12 million hits just for searching for "Edward Cullen" so I think we may be getting some cross over."
I didn't mean no one EVER IN THE ENTIRE WORLD had ever called Edward Cullen a Marty-Sue/etc, just that there was no significant talk of it.
You can find a few blogspots on ANYTHING. But Mary Sue hate is clearly FAR more prevalent.
Frankly I find the existence of "Gary-Stu" as slur to excuse "Mary Sue" about as relevant as the term "Honkey" or "Cracker" to excuse other racial epithets. But I don't want to go down the path of discussing racial epithets.
My point is that the Mary Sue label is over-used and abused, while token flippant comments like "is Edward Cullen a Gary Stu?" pretty irrelevant to the pressures of self-censorship that the Mary Sue label puts on writers to make female protagonists dull and irrelevant.