That isn't a lot of America. Like any country, we have our stereotypes and the redneck jackoff gun owner is your Groundskeeper Willy. What we do have is a strong, passionate type of people who fight for gun rights, which every American has. The thing is they do it with more intensity than we can find for any other right. I wish we were that motivated to fight for the fourth amendment but for many reasons it doesn't happen. No surprise privacy is dead, our rights are violated and so are we.Carzinex said:The frustrating thing about this fetishization of guns alot of america has
I don't think that makes guns our fetish, I think it shows a stronger connection between people and gun rights because guns are something you can own and hold in your hands. I think there's a more powerless feeling with privacy rights because of how powerful and invasive our government, ISPs and technology have become, and privacy isn't something you can hold in your hand and shout "from my cold, dead hands." There was no fight for privacy; it was just taken from us.
I think religious text can be like law, which is sacred but to some degree open to interpretation. There's definitely not an absolute belief in the second amendment; we have a lot of regulation and don't allow all firearms to all people, and Americans against more gun control mostly feel what we have is fair enough.The constitution is a great historical document to be proud of, but its not a religious text.
I encourage you to research gun laws in the US as they are anything but lax. In my state I need to apply for a permit with state police, who perform a background check. Yes, background checks are a thing here, despite what all the talk is about. There are ideas about "expansion", but as I've argued repeatedly these mass shooters are consistently people who were not red flagged at the time(s) of acquiring guns because they were neither criminals nor mentally ill. Even if we flagged everyone who leaves a mean comment on a Facebook post, how are we supposed to watch a few million people and make sure they have no access to a gun? That's pretty much impossible in a country full of them.Simply put, guns kill people, no really they do, cant be arsed with a semantic argument. If you dont care about that and would prefer to still let toddlers and mental patients have easy access to them then fair play just don't moan when folks get shot.
We've had Obama for years. He hates guns; they and gun lobbyists (such as the NRA) are #1 on his shit list because it's the single issue he and liberal Democrats lose nearly every time. They paint this as political extremism yet these are the people who politicize the issue and are driven to increase gun laws for purely political reasons. There's a reason this is a political fight and that we're not talking about violence and mental health, and that's squarely on the shoulders of our petty leaders. They're not elected to pick fights and turn people against each other to advance their positions, they're supposed to be helping us.Similar argument to the other side, if you hate guns then vote in a fucker who will not listen to the gun lobbyists or you know stand yourselves.
The link set me down on the front page of the blog. I took a look around anyway and quickly determined that Melissa McEwan is made of weapons-grade stupidity. It's the kind of stupidity that takes effort to enrich and develop and use on her enemies. I'd quote some of it but will just say that I don't doubt there are shootings where the guys have sex issues, it's just not significant to the gun violence issue as a whole. Even as examples it's misleading to direct the discussion toward males and sexism.thaluikhain said:this recent post at Shakesville includes a small list of notably misogynistic mass shooters, complete with links.
The problem I have with it is that we're either left with blaming social development of males, masculinity itself or condemning art for being a bad influence. There's nothing good that can come out of this, but I think it's most important to understand that gender issues have always been around and so have means for men to harm women. It doesn't add up that males are suddenly taking up arms and taking on women.I'm saying it's how our culture tends to see how gender works, and says how it's supposed to work. You can't point at any one thing and say "this is the cause", but you can point at trends and say "this is an example".