I was writing a good answer to a now locked thread, and it did get me thinking a bit. Most sites and magasines apply the "out of 10" rating system, feel free to post candidates of the perfect 10 games, but, what would you consider the criteria for your perfect ten, and how is this different from what you think the mainstream market would consider one? Also a number of reviews don't tend to judge a game for being "fun" they only look at lifetime, graphics, gameplay and other things describing it as good or bad.
For example I don't think multiplayer should effect the overall score, but, I know that wouldn't fly in the mainstream reviews. Also I don't think I could name a perfect 10 game, I honestly don't think there is a perfect game out and about.
So what makes up your perfect 10? How is it different to mainstream, and by your criteria, what is a ten if there are any?
For example I don't think multiplayer should effect the overall score, but, I know that wouldn't fly in the mainstream reviews. Also I don't think I could name a perfect 10 game, I honestly don't think there is a perfect game out and about.
So what makes up your perfect 10? How is it different to mainstream, and by your criteria, what is a ten if there are any?