Um... Yay?
Although compared to what I read of the rest of you guy's(?) results I am a horrible person and, it would seem, rather boring...
I'm in my twenties as well, but I have a considerable amount of money.Your Gaffer said:I have a feeling all the Escapists being so close together is an indicator of our ages and economic levels. I am in my twenties and don't make much money. How about all of you?
I'm sorry but your argument seems a bit off to me. If you went ahead and asked people with an inheritable disability that they got from one of their parents such as a dangerous heart condition whether or not they would like to exist I'm sure most if not all of them would say yes. In fact now that I think about it I find your stance rather offensive. Surely no inheritable disability is bad enough to warrant preventing the person who has it from ever being born? Isn't it better to live with your parents disability than to not live?A Satanic Panda said:I agreed with this. It just seems unfair to the child that it would have to live with it's parents disabilities. And a bit less so to tax payers that will probably have to support the child.People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce.
I'm not talking about plain old heart conditions or normal inheritable diseases. I'm talking about the more extreme stuff. Disabilities that would normally kill the child before it reached adolescence. Diseases that occur in say 1 in 300 million. Diseases that make the said child's life just one long visit to the ER again and again. And with no practical treatment.Use_Imagination_here said:I'm sorry but your argument seems a bit off to me. If you went ahead and asked people with an inheritable disability that they got from one of their parents such as a dangerous heart condition whether or not they would like to exist I'm sure most if not all of them would say yes. In fact now that I think about it I find your stance rather offensive. Surely no inheritable disability is bad enough to warrant preventing the person who has it from ever being born? Isn't it better to live with your parents disability than to not live?A Satanic Panda said:I agreed with this. It just seems unfair to the child that it would have to live with it's parents disabilities. And a bit less so to tax payers that will probably have to support the child.People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce.
We're talking about an enormous restriction on the lives of a statistically relevant portion of the population. A violation of basic human rights. Imagine the goverment forcibly detaining and castrating you because you have an inheritable heart condition. Your argument is hardly convincing enough to warrant something like that, and even if it was enforcing such a law would be horrible for your countries morale, not to mention extremely impractical.
Well you could have specified that. Now you just had me confused. Still wouldn't be worth the political hassle you'd create by enforcing something like that, not by a long shot. Especially when cases like that are so rare.A Satanic Panda said:I'm not talking about plain old heart conditions or normal inheritable diseases. I'm talking about the more extreme stuff. Disabilities that would normally kill the child before it reached adolescence. Diseases that occur in say 1 in 300 million. Diseases that make the said child's life just one long visit to the ER again and again. And with no practical treatment.Use_Imagination_here said:I'm sorry but your argument seems a bit off to me. If you went ahead and asked people with an inheritable disability that they got from one of their parents such as a dangerous heart condition whether or not they would like to exist I'm sure most if not all of them would say yes. In fact now that I think about it I find your stance rather offensive. Surely no inheritable disability is bad enough to warrant preventing the person who has it from ever being born? Isn't it better to live with your parents disability than to not live?A Satanic Panda said:I agreed with this. It just seems unfair to the child that it would have to live with it's parents disabilities. And a bit less so to tax payers that will probably have to support the child.People with serious inheritable disabilities should not be allowed to reproduce.
We're talking about an enormous restriction on the lives of a statistically relevant portion of the population. A violation of basic human rights. Imagine the goverment forcibly detaining and castrating you because you have an inheritable heart condition. Your argument is hardly convincing enough to warrant something like that, and even if it was enforcing such a law would be horrible for your countries morale, not to mention extremely impractical.