The War Z

Recommended Videos

Kyrinn

New member
May 10, 2011
127
0
0
SnowBurst said:
1nfinite_Cros5 said:
Grey seemed really STEAMED when it came to coming up with a joke for this guy.

DVS BSTrD said:
War Z? More like Lay Z.
So it's a Lay Z Day Z, then? At least the game has been pulled from the service. All someone had to do was pull a Valve!

I'll be here all weekend, folks!
dayz is the lazyest peice of shit ive ever seen they cant even iron out critical game ruining bugs like retarded ai movements with bohemia behind him glad i never paid for tht crap
You mean bugs that were already addressed if not fixed entirely?
I too am glad that no one paid for DayZ. Except maybe some fools who thought you actually needed to pay for it and "bought" it off some shady website.
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
well rockets a moron for even choosing arma 2's engine for this he should have chose something less buggy i cant think of a worse engine to do this for
I can think of a few... GoldScr, Unreal 1, GeoMod,...
Technically, every engine that can't render large worlds AND contain a lot of players.
thts like saying the worst is pongs engine...
Then don't say he picked the worst engine when it was basically the only engine, that worked.
daw cute how you dno anything about game engines if you say thats the only one thatd work when you could make a game 10 times better with even skyrims creativity engine for crying out loud
Does Skyrims engine support Multiplayer for 100 and more people? No? Then NO, IT WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED!
Heck, I don't even think that Skyrims engine has any sort of netcode in the first place.
i meant taking the bugs out -_- n theres way more engines thatll run 100+ players with no game ruining bugs like planetside 2's etc
 

SnowBurst

New member
Jul 2, 2012
276
0
0
Kyrinn said:
SnowBurst said:
1nfinite_Cros5 said:
Grey seemed really STEAMED when it came to coming up with a joke for this guy.

DVS BSTrD said:
War Z? More like Lay Z.
So it's a Lay Z Day Z, then? At least the game has been pulled from the service. All someone had to do was pull a Valve!

I'll be here all weekend, folks!
dayz is the lazyest peice of shit ive ever seen they cant even iron out critical game ruining bugs like retarded ai movements with bohemia behind him glad i never paid for tht crap
You mean bugs that were already addressed if not fixed entirely?
I too am glad that no one paid for DayZ. Except maybe some fools who thought you actually needed to pay for it and "bought" it off some shady website.
i mean bugs like tht retarded run animation that zombies have which make them impossible to kill untill theyre stopped infront of u which should have been fixed before release the game isnt even worthy of the title alpha its pre alpha at best practically just a proof of concept... rocket just piled on more features without fixing the ones allready there until it became a complete mess
 

Bindal

New member
May 14, 2012
1,320
0
0
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
well rockets a moron for even choosing arma 2's engine for this he should have chose something less buggy i cant think of a worse engine to do this for
I can think of a few... GoldScr, Unreal 1, GeoMod,...
Technically, every engine that can't render large worlds AND contain a lot of players.
thts like saying the worst is pongs engine...
Then don't say he picked the worst engine when it was basically the only engine, that worked.
daw cute how you dno anything about game engines if you say thats the only one thatd work when you could make a game 10 times better with even skyrims creativity engine for crying out loud
Does Skyrims engine support Multiplayer for 100 and more people? No? Then NO, IT WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED!
Heck, I don't even think that Skyrims engine has any sort of netcode in the first place.
i meant taking the bugs out -_- n theres way more engines thatll run 100+ players with no game ruining bugs like planetside 2's etc
PlanetSide 2 is not modable and Sony probably wouldn't give out the Engine to some random guys for a mod. Try again.
 

Kyrinn

New member
May 10, 2011
127
0
0
SnowBurst said:
Kyrinn said:
SnowBurst said:
1nfinite_Cros5 said:
Grey seemed really STEAMED when it came to coming up with a joke for this guy.

DVS BSTrD said:
War Z? More like Lay Z.
So it's a Lay Z Day Z, then? At least the game has been pulled from the service. All someone had to do was pull a Valve!

I'll be here all weekend, folks!
dayz is the lazyest peice of shit ive ever seen they cant even iron out critical game ruining bugs like retarded ai movements with bohemia behind him glad i never paid for tht crap
You mean bugs that were already addressed if not fixed entirely?
I too am glad that no one paid for DayZ. Except maybe some fools who thought you actually needed to pay for it and "bought" it off some shady website.
i mean bugs like tht retarded run animation that zombies have which make them impossible to kill untill theyre stopped infront of u which should have been fixed before release the game isnt even worthy of the title alpha its pre alpha at best practically just a proof of concept... rocket just piled on more features without fixing the ones allready there until it became a complete mess
I wouldn't so much call that a bug as a limitation of the game engine. I think that's the problem anyway, I can't actually remember the reason Rocket gave to say why zombies run like that. Honestly I think hackers are their biggest problem right now. They've finally more or less fixed the problem of people alt+f4ing out of combat. Item duping and converting clip types for ulimited ammo have been fixed too.
As to it's stage in development I'd say it's in alpha; the software is being tested and the game feature is not yet complete. Most stability problems are problems with the server rather than problems with the client.
As long as their stand-alone title is stable and free from hackers (or as free as you can get) I'll proobably play it.
 

the clockmaker

New member
Jun 11, 2010
423
0
0
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
well rockets a moron for even choosing arma 2's engine for this he should have chose something less buggy i cant think of a worse engine to do this for
I can think of a few... GoldScr, Unreal 1, GeoMod,...
Technically, every engine that can't render large worlds AND contain a lot of players.
thts like saying the worst is pongs engine...
Then don't say he picked the worst engine when it was basically the only engine, that worked.
daw cute how you dno anything about game engines if you say thats the only one thatd work when you could make a game 10 times better with even skyrims creativity engine for crying out loud
Does Skyrims engine support Multiplayer for 100 and more people? No? Then NO, IT WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED!
Heck, I don't even think that Skyrims engine has any sort of netcode in the first place.
i meant taking the bugs out -_- n theres way more engines thatll run 100+ players with no game ruining bugs like planetside 2's etc
PlanetSide 2 is not modable and Sony probably wouldn't give out the Engine to some random guys for a mod. Try again.
Also planetside 2 was not out when they began developing Day Z, so using it would be fairly difficult.
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
 

BakedZnake

New member
Sep 27, 2010
128
0
0
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
well rockets a moron for even choosing arma 2's engine for this he should have chose something less buggy i cant think of a worse engine to do this for
I can think of a few... GoldScr, Unreal 1, GeoMod,...
Technically, every engine that can't render large worlds AND contain a lot of players.
thts like saying the worst is pongs engine...
Then don't say he picked the worst engine when it was basically the only engine, that worked.
daw cute how you dno anything about game engines if you say thats the only one thatd work when you could make a game 10 times better with even skyrims creativity engine for crying out loud
Does Skyrims engine support Multiplayer for 100 and more people? No? Then NO, IT WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED!
Heck, I don't even think that Skyrims engine has any sort of netcode in the first place.
Skyrim promised me a game, instead I got a pile of shit with bugs instead. Lets close down bethesda
 

Bindal

New member
May 14, 2012
1,320
0
0
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,776
0
0
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
Bindal said:
SnowBurst said:
well rockets a moron for even choosing arma 2's engine for this he should have chose something less buggy i cant think of a worse engine to do this for
I can think of a few... GoldScr, Unreal 1, GeoMod,...
Technically, every engine that can't render large worlds AND contain a lot of players.
thts like saying the worst is pongs engine...
Then don't say he picked the worst engine when it was basically the only engine, that worked.
daw cute how you dno anything about game engines if you say thats the only one thatd work when you could make a game 10 times better with even skyrims creativity engine for crying out loud
Your pointing to a Bethesda game as the hallmark of stability? Did you get a magical different copy of Skyrim that nobody else in the world got?
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
 

Bindal

New member
May 14, 2012
1,320
0
0
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
When they released the update, they went from only 70 cap servers to both 50 and 100 cap. There are a lot of other problems with the game and advertising on Steam, but this was not one of them. There was a lot of lying and misconceptions going on in Reddit and other places.
 

Bindal

New member
May 14, 2012
1,320
0
0
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
When they released the update, they went from only 70 cap servers to both 50 and 100 cap. There are a lot of other problems with the game and advertising on Steam, but this was not one of them. There was a lot of lying and misconceptions going on in Reddit and other places.
Nice, that you ignore THE CLEAR VIDEO, THAT SHOWS NOTHING BUT 50-SLOT-SERVERS!
 

Soak

New member
Sep 21, 2010
139
0
0
Grey Carter said:
The War Z

In Which We Admit Defeat

Read Full Article
I wouldn't call it defeat at all. Made me remember a cabaretist who said about a politician "i have not yet found any better way to offend her but by quoting her word for word".
Totaly legit.

By that
Copper Zen said:
*snip*
My GODS, the man's a Republican presidential candidate!!!
*snip*
yes indeed :)

Though have to say
Mygaffer said:
I can't believe that Foolproof was suspended for his comments. Since when are you unable to criticize the articles and content on this site? He didn't use any personal attacks and I thought his comment was funny.

I do enjoy this comic more often than not though, so I do disagree with his premise. Still, seems to be a clear case of over-moderation.
i absolutely go along with this!
Even if it was as constructive as most comments ever are, i see no reason at all to suspend him for expressing his opinion like this, not even using any bad language. There are much worse things to say (in general) and much worse has been said in these forums without ever being punished. I don't see how this suspension is rightous in any way!. As long as there is no proper explanation, which is not given by "been suspended for this comment", i think the suspended deserves an apology.
I still like this site but there are more and more things kinda getting on my nerves (more about structure, not about content).
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
When they released the update, they went from only 70 cap servers to both 50 and 100 cap. There are a lot of other problems with the game and advertising on Steam, but this was not one of them. There was a lot of lying and misconceptions going on in Reddit and other places.
Nice, that you ignore THE CLEAR VIDEO, THAT SHOWS NOTHING BUT 50-SLOT-SERVERS!
Just another anti-WarZ video had the cap filter on. I have posted my video showing both types of servers.
 

charge52

New member
Apr 29, 2012
313
0
0
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
When they released the update, they went from only 70 cap servers to both 50 and 100 cap. There are a lot of other problems with the game and advertising on Steam, but this was not one of them. There was a lot of lying and misconceptions going on in Reddit and other places.
Nice, that you ignore THE CLEAR VIDEO, THAT SHOWS NOTHING BUT 50-SLOT-SERVERS!
Just another anti-WarZ video had the cap filter on. I have posted my video showing both types of servers.
It doesn't have a cap filter on dude, when WarZ was released, it promised servers with up to 100 players, the max was 50, as shown in the video. They have released an update, but that does not change the fact that they blatantly fucking lied. People are pissed because they were lied to, they were told on launch that the game could support 100 player servers, but the game couldn't until it finally released an update.
 

Amgeo

New member
Apr 14, 2011
182
0
0
When exaggeration is insufficient, it's time to go the other way.

That's why I want to make an anime parody where the lead is a moderately talented guy with slightly low self-esteem and a tendency to trip (without falling into anybody), with his two friends who are 1) sometimes grumpy but still nice and 2) quiet but friendly.
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
charge52 said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
Bindal said:
Baldr said:
I don't see the big deal?? If you don't want to play on a 50 cap server, just go to the 100 cap server.
There are none. 50 Players is the ONLY amount of players a server can have.

And before you say "then rent your own server and change it": You can't rent servers, either.
That is not true. I was playing with 94 other people the other day. Here the youtube clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
During the Steam-Release, there were only 50-player-servers. Fact, recorded and pointed out countless times.
For example, seen here [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=RtKAm3nzg6I#t=579s], and yet, the whole time it said "up to 100".
When they released the update, they went from only 70 cap servers to both 50 and 100 cap. There are a lot of other problems with the game and advertising on Steam, but this was not one of them. There was a lot of lying and misconceptions going on in Reddit and other places.
Nice, that you ignore THE CLEAR VIDEO, THAT SHOWS NOTHING BUT 50-SLOT-SERVERS!
Just another anti-WarZ video had the cap filter on. I have posted my video showing both types of servers.
It doesn't have a cap filter on dude, when WarZ was released, it promised servers with up to 100 players, the max was 50, as shown in the video. They have released an update, but that does not change the fact that they blatantly fucking lied. People are pissed because they were lied to, they were told on launch that the game could support 100 player servers, but the game couldn't until it finally released an update.
When WarZ was released in October the cap was 30. Then it went to 50. Then it went to 70. That when the foundation release hit and it split the Servers into 50 and 100. I have posted the video of me playing on the 100 man servers right after the foundation release came out, there not much more I can do to prove you wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtB3c627jLY
 

barbzilla

He who speaks words from mouth!
Dec 6, 2010
1,465
0
0
Mr.Tea said:
Ah yes, the "up to" marketing speech...

Like with Internet Service Providers:



Except in WarZ's case, the severs never even went up to 100 players!
That comic really makes me think of Shadowrun. This would be a good satire of "Never make a deal with a dragon".