Lightspeaker said:
Twintix said:
That fucking female elf that was only created just for the sake of having an infuriatingly stupid, flat and pointless romance subplot...
Actually I'm pretty sure that she was created largely because the writers took one look at the novel and went "holy crap there are NO major female characters in this? We MUST have one in". *shrug*
And then they tacked on a pointless, substance-lacking flat romance subplot because the writers went "Holy shit we must have romance in this movie!", perhaps?
Why does the female elf exist? Why did they feel the need to create her? To show the world "Look how progressive we are, there's a GIRL DOING COOL THINGS in this movie, give us all of your money, feminists!" or something?
She wasn't so much badly written as she wasn't written. She was flat, bland. Her only character traits were "knows Legolas" (who also only got a major role in this movie because fanservice; IIRC, he's mentioned in the book, but doesn't really do much stuff in the front, right?) and "falls in love with dwarf".
The book didn't need her.
The movies didn't need her.
The story was just fine without this character that serves absolutely zero purpose to anything.
I'm sorry if I seem riled up by this, but I
hate when characters[footnote]Any kind of character, just to be clear; I don't want someone to believe that I only get annoyed when it happens to women.[/footnote] are made just to fill some imaginary quota or for pointless romance. I liked the first
Hobbit movie. I might be in a minority here on this site, but I really did. But the inclusion of that elf just made me lose all interest in seeing the last movie. Her inclusion ruined the movie for me because of how tacked-on she is and how much space she takes.
I could write how this makes me feel in ways that will make everyone angrily disagree with me. But I don't feel like turning this thread into a flame war or pissing people off.
So here's Adam Savage's duck army instead.