They are pretty bad aren't they? I tend to like Internet news better.Buckshaft said:All british newspapers are shit. At least the redtops have page 3 going for them. The Guardian is basically the mail for pretentious left-wingers, and the only way I'd ever support the guardian is buying those Charlier Brooker books they publish.
I think it's supposed to be jarring because it's a falsely infused feeling, it's showing how his feelings are being cynically exploited but how it feels so real for him. Since if I recall correctly it was a film about making films it's quite an interesting stance.OneCatch said:Yeah, but they try *really* hard to show how much of a dick the father was to justify the heist, and then have shots lingering on Cillian Murphy's face to show the 'wonderful' catharsis and closure that it's given him. Even though he's presumably going to go insane in a year or two because of it. It's... jarring.
That's a personal preference thing but I thought it was fairly balanced. It's mostly portrayed from the point of view of those that like the system so of course it's glowing but I still think it's a fun book. Just mentioning the speculative angle though, the amount of people i see quoting Starship Troopers as if it was a Goodkind-esque doorstop laying out the author's exact opinion.Science fiction is my favourite genre, and I read a lot - I understand the concept of speculative fiction!
That said, Heinlein is almost masturbatory in his portray of this militaristic society.
CommentisFree is technically speaking user generated, but in practice a lot of the content is written elsewhere and the Guardian staff approach them for the use of the blogs. Additionally it's been the site of some fairly hateful stuff (as in, equal to or greater than the Mail) but the equal truism of everyone hating the Mail is that no one reads the Guardian so they don't get called on it.This wasn't directed at me, but did any newspaper, left or right, apologise over Andrew Mitchell? And anyway, there were allegations made by a few police officers, it's not like the Guardian was responsible for inventing the words he apparently said.
CommentisFree is user generated. The Comment section contains opinion pieces, for which less editorial control is exerted, and less research/evidence generally expected. Most newspapers have something similar. For example, Peter Hitchins does spectacularly dishonest pieces in the equivalent section in the Express. Richard Littlejohn and Jain Moir do/did the same in the Mail.
They aren't as bad as some of the red tops but they also claim to be morally superior so to catch them being as underhanded and speculative as other papers and then making like their shit doesn't stink is pretty damn distasteful.Of course 'other media outlets being as bad' wouldn't excuse the Guardian, but it does make it rather odd for you to specifically pick it out. Especially when other outlets aren't just 'as bad' but are worse with regard to things like quantifiable instances of phone hacking.