Wh... wh... wait... what?viranimus said:I love how "Steam is the answer" when Steam is no different than Origin.
Perhaps if the que.../sigh never mind, not going there.
I say Good for Origin. While no better than Steam, Technically it is a sound move. If you cannot share the market, next best thing is to try and divide it. The more "Origin exclusives" that exist will take consumers away from steam. (Because really if you are not willing to use Steam, you wont be willing to use Origin either so it will only really be existing customers) If they are serious, they need to rip away a few partners, one of which would have to be one of the ones propping up steam. Activision (My god the horror of a strong partnership between EA & Activision), Bethesda, Take 2, or Ubisoft. On the strength of having a much bigger/better catalog of proprietary high profile offerings than valve, Securing an exclusivity of distribution deal would be like ripping out one of steams main arteries. One high profile exclusivity deal would have the potential create a whole new "Client war" as smaller houses start getting pushed to one side or another and customers following suit to the client that has the developers they specifically want to play.
This industry crash keeps getting more and more entertaining
A person here who doesn't hate Origin because grrrrambleranthatespew EA!!!!!!!!>!??!>!:L@L¬!
I am surprise. We should be friends.
Origin is a perfectly functional DRM platform, just like Steam, whilst it may not provide good sales like Steam it hardly impacts you to run it for the duration of your use of games on it. My biggest gripe is lack of bandwidth throttling but otherwise it's perfectly serviceable as a service.