I agree with most of your comments on this, but until the 'could' in your sentence turns into a 'does' I will not be convinced that legislation is needed. It is the same shaky foundation that the people who are trying to ban computer games are using and it just does not add up.UberNoodle said:-snip-
In fact, their view is the affect that such drawings and sexualisation COULD have on PEOPLE, who are NOT imaginary and DO have legal rights.
-snip-
This.Red-Link said:Damn do I love all of the people who miss the entire problem with such a loosely worded bill. They may as well say, "Good for California banning any violent game image they can, or suggestion of violence, while Hollywood keeps producing multi-million dollar gore-fests."
I know it's been explained several times, but it appears that it STILL bears repeating. The issue here isn't sexualization of minors. It's allowing anything that may even slightly cause issue with a person more prude than a puritan being banned, and then there's the issue of regulating some mediums while allowing others to remain unaffected. There's also the more theoretical issue of art and censorship.
EDIT: And to the people who laugh at people for worrying about the "what-ifs" versus real enactment, you have to remember, all it takes is one person to go to far with a law that allows them to do so. Yes, some of it may be alarmist, but even without probability on its side, possibility will always lurk in the shadows.
Goddamnit people are stupid.... D:John Funk said:You realize that this could potentially relegate things like "Berserk" and "Evangelion" to the back room with all the hardcore porn, right?AboveUp said:One part of me feels this law is stupid and idiotic.
Another part of me hopes this law ends the moe trend and bring back actual content.
That latter part of me is such a naive guy.
Very well said.Booze Zombie said:Power to them, censorship makes the world boring.
The original rationalization behind the child pornography laws was to protect (Real) children. Now they're doing a half-assed attempt at "banning another form" of "child pornography". (It's hard to call something a child if it doesn't technically have an age). I was insulting you for the post being nothing but a (mini) lecture against people who dare to like something you don't. One without valid points, or information. If someone acts like a tard, I reserve the right to insult their intelligence by calling them one.UberNoodle said:-SNIP-
Jonci said:I'm with the anime/manga creators. They shouldn't have to answer to the whims of their government about what they can and can't make, especially if its some shotty bill that lets them set unfair classifications. Next thing you know you'll need an ID to purchase Lova Hina and Negima. And Dance at the Vampire Bung would just get ripped apart.
First off please note that not everything I'm saying here is 100% accurate, but rather my understanding of how things are.Ilyak1986 said:My take on just about everything is consent. Sure, you can make something really disturbing, but so long as it's marketed as such to those that would buy it, why am I the one to be getting in between that?
As Theultimateend said, child pornography is bad because it requires a child. If there are people that enjoy that, well, I don't want to be associated with them, but that's their prerogative.
Frankly, I can't stand almost all of the magical-or-pilot-of-giant-robot-teen-saves-world anime. I wish there were other kinds of anime made. I mean heck, we have (had?) our Saturday morning cartoons about kids saving the world or whatever it is, then we have our more late-night kind of stuff that's clearly *not* for kids like adult swim.
How about some anime for adults, and I don't mean "adults only" aka hentai, I mean some generally philosophically deep stuff not just "pretty teen beats up bad guys".
IMO if the anime studios were to make anime that targeted the people who enjoy things such as The Daily Show, they could have a ton of success.
It's Shōnen and Seinen. You were pretty close though.ZamielTheHunter said:First off please note that not everything I'm saying here is 100% accurate, but rather my understanding of how things are.
The shows that you're describing, the magical girl animes and teen in giant robot saves world animes, generally fall under different headings than more mature shows. If my understanding is correct, shows tend to be categorized by the crowd they are marketed towards. The shows you described generally fall under the descriptors "shounen" or "shoujou" (not sure about spelling) meaning they are being marketed towards people between the ages of 12 and 20 or there about. More mature shows with philosophically deep messages tend to be labeled as "sannin" which are marketed to people from ages 18-30 or so. Many of the shows mentioned in this topic fall under the "sannin" heading if you're looking to watch something like that. Not to say that there aren't shounens or shoujous with strong philosophical messages, but most of them are intended for younger audiences than those who would watch the daily show.
Thank you for the correction, I don't want to misuse the terms or mistake their meanings. I've only ever heard them spoken and never seen them written so I appreciate the help.Chibz said:It's Shōnen and Seinen. You were pretty close though.ZamielTheHunter said:First off please note that not everything I'm saying here is 100% accurate, but rather my understanding of how things are.
The shows that you're describing, the magical girl animes and teen in giant robot saves world animes, generally fall under different headings than more mature shows. If my understanding is correct, shows tend to be categorized by the crowd they are marketed towards. The shows you described generally fall under the descriptors "shounen" or "shoujou" (not sure about spelling) meaning they are being marketed towards people between the ages of 12 and 20 or there about. More mature shows with philosophically deep messages tend to be labeled as "sannin" which are marketed to people from ages 18-30 or so. Many of the shows mentioned in this topic fall under the "sannin" heading if you're looking to watch something like that. Not to say that there aren't shounens or shoujous with strong philosophical messages, but most of them are intended for younger audiences than those who would watch the daily show.
They no longer do that if I remember correctly ( and yes I think they were used)...The Jakeinator said:May I remind people Tokyo sells panties in Vending Machines. I don't really want to know, but God help us if their used.
I think people aren't complaining about the fact that Japan wants to regulate this stuff so much as the vague wording of the bill. Indeed, I doubt anyone here would object to manga depicting rape being withheld from minors, but there's a problem when the language is such that it might also include something like NGE.UberNoodle said:Clearly what the bill needs is language to ensure that CONTEXT is taken into account with any ruling. The current rating system has this, and that is why sex in a film is not classified as pornography. The reason for its being is NOT the sex itself. Therefore, with such language introduced or POINTED OUT (there is a really good chance that the bill HAS this language but the media and interest groups are going for the sensationalist angle), something like Evangelion would NOT be banned or adversly affected. Something like Urutsukidoji WOULD probably be.