Trailers: Duke Nukem Forever: Babes

Recommended Videos

nagi

New member
Mar 20, 2009
84
0
0
For those who do not understand the joke: try googling what tongue-in-cheek humor is. The world of DNF is so over-the-top ridiculous that to not notice, you have to either not have a sense of humor, be a clusterf... of bad experiences towards men, or just have a giant rod stuck up your behind.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
They're making him a completely unrealistic, ridiculous, over-the-top hero in order to make fun of how completely ridiculous male chauvinism actually is. Do you seriously think that this game takes itself seriously? The stuff that is truly sexist and damaging to women is stuff like Twilight that basically tells them that there only worth is their chastity and whether men want them.
Caricature =/= satire.

Of course the game doesn't take itself seriously. Do you think most racists take their jokes seriously? No. But the intent behind the jokes is still there, and still quite real. If I run around yelling about how all Japanese people have inside-out genitals or something, do I really believe something like that? No, but the fact that I feel it's okay to run around making fun of Japanese people shows that I do believe some rather twisted-up things about them.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Baresark said:
We should all be ok with that, CoD was marketed in a way that makes all the players mass murderers.
Mass murder isn't an imitable behavior (by any practical imagining in reasonable discussion). So, while overly-violent entertainment may be a problem, it's not as immediate problem as entertainment that does things like DNF. People are far more likely to imitate the game's objectification of women than they are acts of war, because:

1. It's easier to do.
2. It's cheaper.
3. It's legal.
4. It's easier for people to ignore and pretend it's not a problem.

I think you should probably not play the game, that is my best advice for you. Besides, objectification based on sex happens both ways. It's definitely a two way street. The American thing to do is actually to walk away from the game and not pay it any mind.
And? Yeah, it happens both ways. It happens far more often toward women. But regardless, the idea that it goes both ways doesn't mean it's not a problem. It just means its an even bigger problem. Or would we suggest that war isn't a problem since both sides are allowed to shoot? (Called a tu quoque fallacy, by the by)

Your edit still shows a clear lack of understanding of what "satire" is. Right now, it's just a buzz word people throw around to give a free pass to the racist/sexist/etc. jokes they want to be able to enjoy.
 

Pedro The Hutt

New member
Apr 1, 2009
980
0
0
Have you played a Duke Nukem before DN3D? :p He used to wear a pink shirt and swore to the villain he'd defeat him fast enough to be back in time to watch Oprah.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Dastardly said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
They're making him a completely unrealistic, ridiculous, over-the-top hero in order to make fun of how completely ridiculous male chauvinism actually is. Do you seriously think that this game takes itself seriously? The stuff that is truly sexist and damaging to women is stuff like Twilight that basically tells them that there only worth is their chastity and whether men want them.
Caricature =/= satire.

Of course the game doesn't take itself seriously. Do you think most racists take their jokes seriously? No. But the intent behind the jokes is still there, and still quite real. If I run around yelling about how all Japanese people have inside-out genitals or something, do I really believe something like that? No, but the fact that I feel it's okay to run around making fun of Japanese people shows that I do believe some rather twisted-up things about them.
I think a caricature is pretty damn close to being satire. Do you really think people who tell dead baby jokes actually hate or want to eat babies? I'm pretty sure most of them just tell the jokes for shock value, and I think it's the same thing for Duke Nukem. This game isn't going to destroy western society. I doubt it will affect very many young girls at all because there aren't going to be that many young girls playing it. Certainly any parent who lets their young child play the game is just a horrible parent. Duke also takes steroids and flings poop, do you think Gearbox endorses those kind of actions as well?

It could be the case that Randy Pitchford really does think all women should be sluts, and is secretly trying to undermine all women in American society with this game, but I frankly find that scenario rather unlikely. You're basically saying it's a sin to find humor in anything even mildly offensive because it means that you wholeheartedly embrace the value system of the joke. That's a load of bull in my opinion. In fact, I think that if everyone had more of a sense of humor there would be much less conflict in the world. It's the people that take everything deadly seriously that you have to watch out for.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
I think a caricature is pretty damn close to being satire. Do you really think people who tell dead baby jokes actually hate or want to eat babies? I'm pretty sure most of them just tell the jokes for shock value, and I think it's the same thing for Duke Nukem.
Shock value =/= satire, either. Satire is something completely different, and people should avoid using words they don't understand the meaning of.

This game isn't going to destroy western society. I doubt it will affect very many young girls at all because there aren't going to be that many young girls playing it.
Of course not. It's a symptom, not a cause. But it's not the little girls we're worried about. It's the little boys (or the GROWN "little boys") that are basking in the glory of this objectified vision of women, and how it impacts their outlook and expectations of those girls.

It could be the case that Randy Pitchford really does think all women should be sluts, and is secretly trying to undermine all women in American society with this game, but I frankly find that scenario rather unlikely. You're basically saying it's a sin to find humor in anything even mildly offensive because it means that you wholeheartedly embrace the value system of the joke. That's a load of bull in my opinion. In fact, I think that if everyone had more of a sense of humor there would be much less conflict in the world. It's the people that take everything deadly seriously that you have to watch out for.
1. Who has said anything about this ending Western society? I'm just saying games like this are more destructive than they are productive, and they're nothing to be proud of in the least. That's not the same as what you're saying I'm saying.

2. Sure, I can laugh at jokes that make fun of myself--in company I enjoy and trust. And, hell, I can laugh at jokes about, say, black people. It's easy for me, because I'm not a black person. But that's the ticket, isn't it? It's easy to tell someone to "have a sense of humor" when you're making fun of them. It's also kind of dickish, truth told.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
Dastardly said:
You are arguing that how a porn film is sexist because it has naked chicks.
Its people like you that doesn't allow the industry to mature, people like you make stupid moral guardians.
The trailer clearly said that those who are easily offended close their eyes and the game is rated for 18 year olds not the 13 year old.
If any kid gets their hands on the game go blame the parents not gearbox just cause they made the game.
And just so that you get more steamed I am going to advertise this game in my area.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Dastardly said:
Baresark said:
We should all be ok with that, CoD was marketed in a way that makes all the players mass murderers.
Mass murder isn't an imitable behavior (by any practical imagining in reasonable discussion). So, while overly-violent entertainment may be a problem, it's not as immediate problem as entertainment that does things like DNF. People are far more likely to imitate the game's objectification of women than they are acts of war, because:

1. It's easier to do.
2. It's cheaper.
3. It's legal.
4. It's easier for people to ignore and pretend it's not a problem.

I think you should probably not play the game, that is my best advice for you. Besides, objectification based on sex happens both ways. It's definitely a two way street. The American thing to do is actually to walk away from the game and not pay it any mind.
And? Yeah, it happens both ways. It happens far more often toward women. But regardless, the idea that it goes both ways doesn't mean it's not a problem. It just means its an even bigger problem. Or would we suggest that war isn't a problem since both sides are allowed to shoot? (Called a tu quoque fallacy, by the by)

Your edit still shows a clear lack of understanding of what "satire" is. Right now, it's just a buzz word people throw around to give a free pass to the racist/sexist/etc. jokes they want to be able to enjoy.
The mass murder depicted in CoD and other games of that type is very imitable. It happens every day, and it's not the depiction and fantasy acts of it that are problematic, it's the desensitizing of the populace to it, and the idea of an increase in popularity of a chiefly military culture. THis is not an issue really though, because most people understand that this is not reality.

Also, it's not actually a problem. For some people, such as yourself, it's a huge problem. But unless you are a female that has dealt directly with said issues, I don't really think you have a leg to stand on. If girls are upset by this, it makes sense, but if you are not an objectified female yourself, then you shouldn't worry about them. My girlfriend thinks this game is hilarious looking. She is a very intelligent and highly logical person. She just isn't so serious, and is able to figure this as some adolescent fantasy that is no more harmful than CoD.

You have an issue, and it's all about you having the issue, not the world, and not society or videogames. Like I said, you should just not pay any attention to the game.

PS. Satire is: the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly.

This game fits that pretty well. The sex and violence depicted is obviously the folly in question, and it's very sarcastic in nature, as depicted by the extreme version of all the things that offend you so easily.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Baresark said:
PS. Satire is: the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly.
Right. It's the use of sarcasm in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice or folly.

The idea is that satire uses the vice, and then exposes it as a bad thing. It doesn't just use it. Sarcasm is the same thing. Verbal irony, in which the user makes very clear the fact that what they are saying is not what they believe.

Exaggeration is not the same thing. Your own definition proves definitively that this is not an example of satire.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Vibhor said:
Dastardly said:
You are arguing that how a porn film is sexist because it has naked chicks.
Its people like you that doesn't allow the industry to mature, people like you make stupid moral guardians.
The trailer clearly said that those who are easily offended close their eyes and the game is rated for 18 year olds not the 13 year old.
If any kid gets their hands on the game go blame the parents not gearbox just cause they made the game.
And just so that you get more steamed I am going to advertise this game in my area.
I'm not sure what you think that'll prove. I'm not trying to get this game pulled from the shelves. I just think it's a clear example of what's wrong with this industry. Manchildren making fan-service games, claiming that they're "satire," when there's clearly not even the slightest hint of an inkling of the beginning of the smallest bit of understanding as to even the most vague definition of "satire."

If you replace the sexist references with racist references, you'll notice a humongous difference. Willful ignorance is no excuse. Sell the game, who the hell cares, but call it what it really is. Don't try to make it anything as deep or nuanced as "satire." It's fan-service for man-children that like to look at boobs and think women exist as life support for boobs.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Dastardly said:
Baresark said:
PS. Satire is: the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly.
Right. It's the use of sarcasm in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice or folly.

The idea is that satire uses the vice, and then exposes it as a bad thing. It doesn't just use it. Sarcasm is the same thing. Verbal irony, in which the user makes very clear the fact that what they are saying is not what they believe.

Exaggeration is not the same thing. Your own definition proves definitively that this is not an example of satire.
Haha, then I'll simply take this root. It's not satire, and no one cares if it is or not. You care, because it's the single thing that is repeated in all the comments that you seem to be able to deal with. So, you have the idea of satire down better than anyone on this whole entire forum. But your arguments are still bunk. You are upset about this portraying or glorifying a problem you see in our culture, but the only person who is having trouble with the concept of this game is you. Don't be offended for other people, they can do it on their own. Don't pay attention to the game, it's not for you, or people like you. I'll play it, have a good laugh, then go cuddle with my girlfriend and tell her about some of the stuff in it that made me laugh, then she'll laugh. You see, that is how adults handle this kind of thing. You roll with punches, or you get knocked out. You are just about knocked out because your idea of what is and is not acceptable in society isn't realistic. People will find things funny that are inappropriate. That is a fact of life. Live with it, or don't, but the only person hurt by your ideas are you, not anyone else.

Have fun my contrarian friend, fight your good fight, and people will still buy this game for tits.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Dastardly said:
Vibhor said:
Dastardly said:
You are arguing that how a porn film is sexist because it has naked chicks.
Its people like you that doesn't allow the industry to mature, people like you make stupid moral guardians.
The trailer clearly said that those who are easily offended close their eyes and the game is rated for 18 year olds not the 13 year old.
If any kid gets their hands on the game go blame the parents not gearbox just cause they made the game.
And just so that you get more steamed I am going to advertise this game in my area.
I'm not sure what you think that'll prove. I'm not trying to get this game pulled from the shelves. I just think it's a clear example of what's wrong with this industry. Manchildren making fan-service games, claiming that they're "satire," when there's clearly not even the slightest hint of an inkling of the beginning of the smallest bit of understanding as to even the most vague definition of "satire."

If you replace the sexist references with racist references, you'll notice a humongous difference. Willful ignorance is no excuse. Sell the game, who the hell cares, but call it what it really is. Don't try to make it anything as deep or nuanced as "satire." It's fan-service for man-children that like to look at boobs and think women exist as life support for boobs.
Don't replace them with racist references, it's not nearly the same thing. Man children make games to make money, end of story. It's not satire, it's a game, live with that fact.

Edit: it's perfectly natural for men to want to look at boobs, and as crazy as it sounds, have sex and procreate. You deny the biological push of our whole entire race, don't worry about boobs, I'm sure you won't have any problems.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Dastardly said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
I think a caricature is pretty damn close to being satire. Do you really think people who tell dead baby jokes actually hate or want to eat babies? I'm pretty sure most of them just tell the jokes for shock value, and I think it's the same thing for Duke Nukem.
Shock value =/= satire, either. Satire is something completely different, and people should avoid using words they don't understand the meaning of.
Lol. I never said shock value was the same thing as satire. Satire is when you make fun of something by imitating it in a comical or over-the-top manner. The shock value emerges from the over-the-top nature of Duke Nukem's satire. The game also has steroid use because that fits into the ultra masculine archetype that the game is lampooning.

You seem to think that in order for something to be satire, it must explicitly state that what it is imitating is bad. That just isn't the case. I can't think of a single example of satire that does that. By making Duke so over-the-top they are implying satire. I have a hard time believing that a game with so many comedic overtones is taking itself seriously. Tell me, what could they add to the game without taking anything out that would make it satire in your opinion? How could they make it more explicit than it already is? Does Duke actually have to break the fourth wall and say that it's satire?

Dastardly said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
This game isn't going to destroy western society. I doubt it will affect very many young girls at all because there aren't going to be that many young girls playing it.
Of course not. It's a symptom, not a cause. But it's not the little girls we're worried about. It's the little boys (or the GROWN "little boys") that are basking in the glory of this objectified vision of women, and how it impacts their outlook and expectations of those girls.
The 'cause' is people not having critical thinking skills. If a young boy cannot realize that Duke Nukem is wholly unrealistic and shouldn't be imitated it's because he lacks the mental capacity to make this realization. Either he is too young and his parents shouldn't let him play the game, or he's just stupid.

Dastardly said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
It could be the case that Randy Pitchford really does think all women should be sluts, and is secretly trying to undermine all women in American society with this game, but I frankly find that scenario rather unlikely. You're basically saying it's a sin to find humor in anything even mildly offensive because it means that you wholeheartedly embrace the value system of the joke. That's a load of bull in my opinion. In fact, I think that if everyone had more of a sense of humor there would be much less conflict in the world. It's the people that take everything deadly seriously that you have to watch out for.
1. Who has said anything about this ending Western society? I'm just saying games like this are more destructive than they are productive, and they're nothing to be proud of in the least. That's not the same as what you're saying I'm saying.
Of course it's more destructive than productive, the vast majority of video games are. They're generally mindless entertainment, with few exceptions. But once again, if you think it's destructive because of the negative stereotypes, then I have to tell you, there's about 100,000 things you should be more concerned about. A video game that clearly doesn't take itself seriously won't be taken seriously by anyone else who has a brain. There are far worse things like the anorexic models you see all over the place. Those women are seriously held up as the paragons of beauty. They're much more destructive to young girls than some pixelated women in a campy video game.

Dastardly said:
2. Sure, I can laugh at jokes that make fun of myself--in company I enjoy and trust. And, hell, I can laugh at jokes about, say, black people. It's easy for me, because I'm not a black person. But that's the ticket, isn't it? It's easy to tell someone to "have a sense of humor" when you're making fun of them. It's also kind of dickish, truth told.
Meh. Sure it's dickish. If they aren't comfortable with you then you shouldn't make those jokes around them. However, it would be much better for them if they were able to deflect your joke right back at you with a racist joke of their own. And it would be even better if you laughed at it. Nothing solves tension like a little humor. The most important thing is to have a sense of humor about yourself. No one likes somebody who can dish it out but can't take it.
 

Guest_Star

New member
Jul 25, 2010
254
0
0
Why was this an M-rated teaser again? Was there anything (except the intentional sexism) that could be considered mature?


btw:
ReiverCorrupter said:
Well put, sah.