Lol. I never said shock value was the same thing as satire. Satire is when you make fun of something by imitating it in a comical or over-the-top manner. The shock value emerges from the over-the-top nature of Duke Nukem's satire. The game also has steroid use because that fits into the ultra masculine archetype that the game is lampooning.Dastardly said:Shock value =/= satire, either. Satire is something completely different, and people should avoid using words they don't understand the meaning of.ReiverCorrupter said:I think a caricature is pretty damn close to being satire. Do you really think people who tell dead baby jokes actually hate or want to eat babies? I'm pretty sure most of them just tell the jokes for shock value, and I think it's the same thing for Duke Nukem.
You seem to think that in order for something to be satire, it must explicitly state that what it is imitating is bad. That just isn't the case. I can't think of a single example of satire that does that. By making Duke so over-the-top they are implying satire. I have a hard time believing that a game with so many comedic overtones is taking itself seriously. Tell me, what could they add to the game without taking anything out that would make it satire in your opinion? How could they make it more explicit than it already is? Does Duke actually have to break the fourth wall and say that it's satire?
The 'cause' is people not having critical thinking skills. If a young boy cannot realize that Duke Nukem is wholly unrealistic and shouldn't be imitated it's because he lacks the mental capacity to make this realization. Either he is too young and his parents shouldn't let him play the game, or he's just stupid.Dastardly said:Of course not. It's a symptom, not a cause. But it's not the little girls we're worried about. It's the little boys (or the GROWN "little boys") that are basking in the glory of this objectified vision of women, and how it impacts their outlook and expectations of those girls.ReiverCorrupter said:This game isn't going to destroy western society. I doubt it will affect very many young girls at all because there aren't going to be that many young girls playing it.
Of course it's more destructive than productive, the vast majority of video games are. They're generally mindless entertainment, with few exceptions. But once again, if you think it's destructive because of the negative stereotypes, then I have to tell you, there's about 100,000 things you should be more concerned about. A video game that clearly doesn't take itself seriously won't be taken seriously by anyone else who has a brain. There are far worse things like the anorexic models you see all over the place. Those women are seriously held up as the paragons of beauty. They're much more destructive to young girls than some pixelated women in a campy video game.Dastardly said:1. Who has said anything about this ending Western society? I'm just saying games like this are more destructive than they are productive, and they're nothing to be proud of in the least. That's not the same as what you're saying I'm saying.ReiverCorrupter said:It could be the case that Randy Pitchford really does think all women should be sluts, and is secretly trying to undermine all women in American society with this game, but I frankly find that scenario rather unlikely. You're basically saying it's a sin to find humor in anything even mildly offensive because it means that you wholeheartedly embrace the value system of the joke. That's a load of bull in my opinion. In fact, I think that if everyone had more of a sense of humor there would be much less conflict in the world. It's the people that take everything deadly seriously that you have to watch out for.
Meh. Sure it's dickish. If they aren't comfortable with you then you shouldn't make those jokes around them. However, it would be much better for them if they were able to deflect your joke right back at you with a racist joke of their own. And it would be even better if you laughed at it. Nothing solves tension like a little humor. The most important thing is to have a sense of humor about yourself. No one likes somebody who can dish it out but can't take it.Dastardly said:2. Sure, I can laugh at jokes that make fun of myself--in company I enjoy and trust. And, hell, I can laugh at jokes about, say, black people. It's easy for me, because I'm not a black person. But that's the ticket, isn't it? It's easy to tell someone to "have a sense of humor" when you're making fun of them. It's also kind of dickish, truth told.