Gabanuka said:
Since the whole game is satirical in nature I don't think its gonna be pushing the industry back, granted it will generate controversy but the developers know and want that, its pretty much what the game is for.
This isn't satire. Satire makes a point to subversively speak badly about the subject it is pretending to champion.
Duke Nukem isn't making "fun" of sexism and the objectification of women. It's making
light of it. This isn't satirizing shallow, sex-based, man-child entertainment. This is reveling in it.
I'm not a woman, and even I find it unsettlingly awful toward women. Now, as a guy, I do like boobs. They're neat. But I also know that women are more than just life support for those boobs.
Duke games do not.
To understand what I'm getting at, just change the subject a bit. Instead of sexism, substitute racism.
Blazing Saddles's racism was satire, because the racists were all constantly outed as moronic hicks. They were caricatures and were shown to be wrong on all counts. The movie cites common racist stereotypes in order to prove them wrong, not just to say, "Isn't it funny that (we think) black people are like this?"
If a game were made that capitalized on those stereotypes and celebrated them so openly and unapologetically, there would be
fire in the streets. Hell,
Resident Evil 5 accidentally left open the
implication of racism and got the shit kicked out of it in the press. Now, of course, a lot of white people would be able to sit there saying, "What? We're not serious, it's all in good fun! Can't you just take it as a joke?"
That's not satire. They're not challenging the stereotypes, they're celebrating them and wallowing in them. It's wish fulfillment. They're
overdoing it, which makes it slightly comical, but that doesn't turn it into satire. Seriously, that'd be like saying porn is a "satire" of sex because it's comedically crammed full of naked people having sex.