I'm neither actually. What I'm saying is that companies must take many considerations into account. The comfort of their clients, employees, etc is one of them. The whole issues MIGHT have stemmed from co-workers complaining that they don't feel comfortable working around a masculine looking individual in a dress (this is assuming Louise looks masculine), or something along those lines. A supervisor is not allowed to ignore these complaints if they come in quantity, and is forced to try and find SOME form of medium. That medium might not always look PC in the public's eye.arragonder said:If you think that letting her act her gender is somehow Excessively PC you're either stupid or a bigot.Celtic_Kerr said:While yes, transgenders should be treated fairly, companies have to tip toe through the tulips, daisies, daffodils, roses, and any other form of flora that you can imagine, or risk the wrath of discrimination
To the public, if co-workers say they don't feel comfortable because the person is a transsexual, the company is seen as discriminatory and the manager left in the middle of it is "to blame"
These cases are usually incredibly difficult on the manager involved in the middle, and when a minority of some form is on one side and a diversity is on the other, it can be easy to shout prejudice. I don't know all the facts, so I'm not passing judgment. As I've mentioned in quite a few of my posts, my issue is with the 35,000 euro she sued for to make her statement when she could have easily sued for a decent settlement severance and made her voice heard all the same.
Often times companies are happy to give such severances, but there's no talk about if that happened or not.
I would ask that you read into my posts a little more before simply personally attacking my opinions falsely