so what qualifys as a good non postapocoliptic giant robot action movie to you?khaimera said:I get what you are saying. I was pretty high at the time and was just like "wow, these special effect are amazing, look at all the parts these robots have, how did they do that?" The movie, of what I remember, was pretty shitty all around.PhiMed said:zombie711 said:Was I the only person who thought Transformers 2 was really Awsome?
It had tons of action and explosions, and robot killing each other.
Not movie of the year but still really good.But the action sucked. It was poorly choreographed, inexpertly shot, ugly, difficult to follow, and pointless. There was no tension or sense of purpose or danger. I swear during the fight where Optimus "died" I just quit trying to figure out who the hell was doing what and spaced out.khaimera said:I thought of this movie like I do an action game. That means I don't care what the story is and I just want to get straight into the action.
And just when you started to care about what was going on in the action, they'd cut to captain douchebag running like a sissy, or slutdog McGee doing... something... with that damn thing in her purse. Or one of the comic relief characters doing something racially offensive. Or they'd make a dick joke that wouldn't make a 12 year-old chuckle.
I get so tired of people saying this movie was good "because of robots fighting and stuff".
I could make more interesting, more exciting action sequences with some fireworks and gasoline in my back yard.
My friend would disappoint you. He hatred District 9 and The Hurt Locker but ABSOLUTEY LOVED Transformers. His reasons? "Well it has hot babes, cool cars, and awesome action scenes!!!"Gildan Bladeborn said:Usually when people raise that sort of question, the immediate answer is "No, of course you aren't!", but in this case I can honestly say I have never seen anyone else ever describe Transformers 2 as "awesome", or "really good". I've seen people admit to enjoying it of course, but you usually get the sense that at least they know why they weren't supposed to.
First thing that popped in my mind too.luvd1 said:So what was the excuse for the first movie?
ummmm. I can't remember any. But my memory is shot anyways. Got any ideas?zombie711 said:so what qualifys as a good non postapocoliptic giant robot action movie to you?khaimera said:I get what you are saying. I was pretty high at the time and was just like "wow, these special effect are amazing, look at all the parts these robots have, how did they do that?" The movie, of what I remember, was pretty shitty all around.PhiMed said:zombie711 said:Was I the only person who thought Transformers 2 was really Awsome?
It had tons of action and explosions, and robot killing each other.
Not movie of the year but still really good.But the action sucked. It was poorly choreographed, inexpertly shot, ugly, difficult to follow, and pointless. There was no tension or sense of purpose or danger. I swear during the fight where Optimus "died" I just quit trying to figure out who the hell was doing what and spaced out.khaimera said:I thought of this movie like I do an action game. That means I don't care what the story is and I just want to get straight into the action.
And just when you started to care about what was going on in the action, they'd cut to captain douchebag running like a sissy, or slutdog McGee doing... something... with that damn thing in her purse. Or one of the comic relief characters doing something racially offensive. Or they'd make a dick joke that wouldn't make a 12 year-old chuckle.
I get so tired of people saying this movie was good "because of robots fighting and stuff".
I could make more interesting, more exciting action sequences with some fireworks and gasoline in my back yard.
Gremlins. When in doubt, always blame gremlins.luvd1 said:So what was the excuse for the first movie?
Ugh, I think I'm going to be sick.koroem said:It is Sentinel Prime.Jman1236 said:That face in the ark in the trailer better be Unicron.