You are all entitled to say that because I was unable to properly explain things, that means this doesn't work. It would have been a lot better if I could explain it. But it does work actually. I just don't know why it does. Someone needs to explain why it works.
You only need to try it and you will see that it works. I know I'm repeating myself, but one tends to do that when there happens to be only one answer.
The reason I deleted my posts was to clear things up, so that a person who wants to try it out will have an easier time doing it, and when they have a question, they won't be confused by my speculations. I'm not embarrassed about it, I just want a person to just be able to easily read the steps and when they read down, they won't see me trying to explain it (unless I was quoted), because I was just trying to understand, but made the mistake of leading on like I understood. Now I'm trying to correct that.
The reason I said I wouldn't participate because at that moment I was a little doubtful. I went back in the game, saw my perfect aim again, then I came back and changed my mind. So I'm solid that it works, I just don't know why.
You can plant many seeds of doubt. But there is something about the numbers that all of us don't understand, which when used this way makes you aim well. I tried it on, yes, a random idea, and it worked. I tried to explain it, maybe hoping I'd luck on the answer by talking about it . . . but it is true that I cannot do that.
If you try this, any of you, with the exception of someone with a handicap that makes his or her hand shake uncontrollably, you will aim better than before. This will work if you change the pitch and yaw so that it is very low but using the digits I described, and then setting the mouse sensitivity very high with a set of digits from Phi as well, the result is the same if the measurements work out.
If you try my method and you feel you can't aim any better or even worse, THAT is a placebo effect. You aren't even seeing the different behavior of the crosshair! You need only look at how it goes over time and the answer is right there.
As more and more people express how much this doesn't work, your responses become less and less intelligent, until you are reduced eventually to calling me a dummy and that you won't ever invite me to your birthday party. Those sorts of responses don't matter to me. What I'm hoping for is some serious explanation from someone here that can explain this result.
If you have a hand tremor, lowering the overall sensitivity makes sense, but the digits of Phi have to be there still. I had explained that you can use sensitivities that perform a 360 in ANY LENGTH that is in Golden ratio to the width of your screen.
So what one of you needs to do is explain why it works, not why it doesn't work. See, the placebo effect is effecting you, not me.
Elsewhere I had been confronted with the question: "Do you think that everyone else is wrong and that only YOU are right?!" Quite blatantly YES! The METHOD works, my explanations of it were just speculation, and therefore subject to ridicule, that I've accepted. But yes, all of you who say it doesn't work have no idea what you're talking about, shown over time by the decreased level of thinking in your responses.
