Funny pun!Ldude893 said:Ah, the edge of the sweet sword of justice.
He had it coming.
And true, he had it coming.
Seems the court (at least this one) can make just and correct calls as well as the mistakes that most often appear on news sites.
Funny pun!Ldude893 said:Ah, the edge of the sweet sword of justice.
He had it coming.
AHAHA. Dyslexia has never been so hilarious i finally see what i've done wrong and apologise .Frylock72 said:Well, if you read it backwards, it's spelled correctly!cardinalwiggles said:aha. well it's more of how my exclamation of me saying it rather than spelling it correctly but either way it was said without fear !IamQ said:And now you'll feel embarrassed, because you've spelled all of them wrong. It's "Edge".cardinalwiggles said:EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE EGDE
just thought i'd get it out now that it's copyright free.
I'm afraid this, and all of the "$500,000!" comments are incorrect. The linked written judgement lists the amounts as $250,000 and $25,000 for the EIM and the con-man respectively:Andy Chalk said:*blah*
The beating continued. Proudman noted that "as Edge magazine's success grew, Dr. Langdell's behavior became increasingly burdensome." Future eventually agreed to pay $250,000 to Edge Interactive Media and another $250,000 to Langdell himself, "although the total sum was paid into Dr. Langdell's bank account," to buy out all related trademarks, but then Langdell went ahead and "deliberately adopted a logo which is an obvious replica of the claimant's Edge mark."
*blah*
Just makin' things clear. The article probably needs an edit. Also, the full ruling is an extensively entertaining read, and I actually find it easier to understand. Good stuff.From bailii.org [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1489.html]:
42. Agreement was reached in 2004, both with EIM and with Dr Langdell. The result was a Concurrent Trading Agreement ("CTA") with EIM and a Deed with Dr Langdell. Each was paid a substantial sum of money in consideration of entering into the deeds, $250,000 to EIM and $25,000 to Dr Langdell, although the total sum was paid into Dr Langdell's bank account.
But then jokes like this won't be possible:SinisterGehe said:And again, he had it coming. Now if Apple could release "I" from the trademark "words". And other people realize that you can not claim copyright on a word... Words don't even exist for Atheismo's sake...
The moment that happened she jumped on him like a tramp on a sandwich.31. I have decided that I should apply some common sense to this issue.
Ah yes, so it was. Apologies for the error, which has been corrected to reflect the true amounts. Thanks for the heads-up.Santa216 said:I'm afraid this, and all of the "$500,000!" comments are incorrect. The linked written judgement lists the amounts as $250,000 and $25,000 for the EIM and the con-man respectively
Probably the same moron "judge" who charged an 18 year old of "uploading child porn online" for e-mailing himself a video of him fucking his 17 year old girlfriend -- because the judge wanted to make an example out of him...Madara said:I wish he was even more humiliated. He cost honest small time game developers their hard earned money. He was a bully and even though I am happy he got humiliated its still not enough. I want to know what moron judge ever awarded him a victory in the first place. Even being able to copyright the word "edge" is fucking retarded.
Yeah, they finally got off their asses and fixed this fucker but the broken system is still in place. Its like when the IGDA finally decided to remove him, they only did it after he was already on his way down so they scored no points for that.