U.S. Senator Says Violent Games Are "Practice Simulators"

[Farther than stars]

Or maybe, just maybe
Everybody could have politicians that got the facts together before they decide to mess with things they don't understand. You know sit down and think 'what could the implications of my actions be?' or maybe 'is this the only possible cause to this problem?'.

I think you underestimate how much politicians actually do think about those questions. The thing is, you always need to strike a balance between what different groups of people think. And if you think you would be able to make any kind of move as politician without alienating some special-interest group, then have right at it. But I think you'll find that there will always be some demographic which makes you out as being incompetent.
Now, that's just the way things are, but that doesn't mean that it's good thing to attack that politicians' competence. Sometimes it's valid, sure, but mostly it just harms the democratic process by dragging down the debate. Personally, I might not agree with all of Feinstein's ideas, but she's obviously a smart woman and it shows; she's the most popular U.S. senator of the times. I think you should cut her some slack and not portray her as a fool just because we disagree with her on one specific issue.

The military trains people to kill too.

Lets ban those.

Basically that statement implicitly concedes the point that violent games train people to kill. And assuming that you're being sarcastic, you're also saying that it's fine for video games to do that, because the military does it too. Just... think about this kind of stuff before you post it... I do like your avatar though.

 

[Jaden Kazega]

Pokey

May I just say that experience is the greater teacher, though? You might learn OF certain actions or tactics in media, or hell even the internet, but that is only the intellectual side. I watched Bruce Lee and Cowboy Bebop, finding that I really like Jeet Kune Do as a means to defend one's self. More to the point, I like its mindset a great deal. However, knowing it and doing it are two different things. Seeing it allowed me to force a guy in excess of 300 pounds into a wall, yes, but the level of coordination of the people I watched could never be matched without real training. I know I can fire a rifle straight because I have, and no amount of simulation will reproduce that...and tactics attached to that will only serve after practicing a few times for real.

Oh yea, obviously: when I said, "I learned some basic military-esque tactics I would not know about today if not for video games", I was meaning some really REALLY basic 101 stuff. Like what a pincer attack is and such. There is a huge difference between technical training and manipulative training. lol

 

[Mr.Squishy]

Without sounding like I wish death upon an old lady; I think there'll be a shift in the status quo after 10-20 years pass from now, and today's politicians are either dead or no longer in power. Hopefully, the new batch will be less hypocritical and liable to idiotic blaming of pretty harmless virtual entertainment.
And hey, how come she didn't call The Godfather a horse-decapitation simulator? Plus, she really has to hate abbout 90% of all the films made since the 80's, right? They're just as much 'practice simulators' as games. Same with TV series and books.
But she'd never pick on entertainment media that has entwined itself into the cultural consciousness and thus popularity, now would she? Nope, because she knows she'd be called out on her bullshit.

 

[Erttheking]

Another old cook telling me how Call of Duty totally tells impresonable teenagers how to use a gun and Grand Theft Auto totally tells them out to shoot down police helicopters with RPGs? Really? God I've been waiting a long time for a chance to use this photo

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/295/c/e/oh__poor_john_marston_by_booter_freak-d31beex.png

 

[I.Muir]

Or maybe, just maybe
Everybody could have politicians that got the facts together before they decide to mess with things they don't understand. You know sit down and think 'what could the implications of my actions be?' or maybe 'is this the only possible cause to this problem?'.

I think you underestimate how much politicians actually do think about those questions. The thing is, you always need to strike a balance between what different groups of people think. And if you think you would be able to make any kind of move as politician without alienating some special-interest group, then have right at it. But I think you'll find that there will always be some demographic which makes you out as being incompetent.
Now, that's just the way things are, but that doesn't mean that it's good thing to attack that politicians' competence. Sometimes it's valid, sure, but mostly it just harms the democratic process by dragging down the debate. Personally, I might not agree with all of Feinstein's ideas, but she's obviously a smart woman and it shows; she's the most popular U.S. senator of the times. I think you should cut her some slack and not portray her as a fool just because we disagree with her on one specific issue.

The military trains people to kill too.

Lets ban those.

Basically that statement implicitly concedes the point that violent games train people to kill. And assuming that you're being sarcastic, you're also saying that it's fine for video games to do that, because the military does it too. Just... think about this kind of stuff before you post it... I do like your avatar though.

Can a person make a competent decision regarding something they appear to know very little about, will not likely learn about or maybe even refuse to learn having written it off already? This senator might be a smart person but that does not mean she isn't making a dumb decision nor does it mean she has thought THIS issue through. I would not call the gaming community small at this point and it defiantly handles quite a lot of money. Trying to come down on video games would mess with more than a few companies and likely cost a lot people their jobs. Has she really thought this through and knowing this go ahead and attempt to interfere based on the mere speculation that video games only might be a trigger for violence by only a few individuals amongst tens of thousands.

Also what does train to kill really mean anyway? Merely learning to use a gun can be considered training to kill. It does not imply that the individual trained in the use of firearms will go and kill. However when video games are brought into the picture it seems more likely that they believe we are being actively conditioned to go and kill people. I cannot comprehend anybody actually believing any organization would attempt to intentionally do this for no good reason so I assume they mean this is some sort of deadly side effect. With that in mind there is very little correlation between violence in reality and violence in games and no evidence of causation whatsoever. So why then say such an unfounded statement? It may very well be just another person who fears something they don't understand and too old to try at their time of life. If that is the case how likely are they to make an unbiased and informed decision which would be using that intelligence they apparently posses.

You do not need to point out to me that the values of one group might contradict the values of another in politics.

 

[Quantum Glass]

I'm fine with video game regulation, if not outright censorship, but the fact that the initial problem (Videlicet, the tragic school shootings that are becoming all too frequent) isn't really being addressed peeves me. Oh, no, there's no need to look into the bullying, abuse, or other psychologically harmful factors in the perpetrator's environment. There's no need for counseling or trying to help those involved before they can't take it anymore. It's clearly the video games that are doing it. Hey, why should we regulate guns or try to prevent children from gaining access to them, when they only kill people because of video games?

I'm not saying that video games are wholesome. They're not. It's a form of media, and you're going to get games that shouldn't be sold to children. But if video games could desensitize people to killing, the military would have offered Microsoft a contract for a new, top secret Xbox.

 

[Mr Mystery Guest]

She's just a meddling baby-boomer that is incapable of understanding any entertainment that isn't chasing a hoop down the street with a stick. We have maybe just another ten years before that whole rotten generation are finally gone. Ignore them until then.

 

[Farther than stars]

So why then say such an unfounded statement? It may very well be just another person who fears something they don't understand and too old to try at their time of life. If that is the case how likely are they to make an unbiased and informed decision which would be using that intelligence they apparently posses.

And that's my point. She "may very well be just another person who fears something [she] doesn't understand", but that's an assumption on your part. She may also have made that unbiased and informed decision, but just because it falls out against your side, you dismiss her as being "too old to try [and understand] at [her] time of life". And speaking of biases, that last part is just slander, plain and simple.

 

[SmugFrog]

I suppose there's always going to be another Jack Thompson. At least until the next big thing comes along that surpasses those evil satanic video games as the blame of our problems.

It's amazing to me with the amount of stabbings that are going on that people aren't more concerned about mental illness in general, instead of blaming the violence on objects.

Also... Am I the only one who thinks she looks like professor Umbridge?

I was wondering why she looks so disturbing to me! She's like an older real-life version of that character.

 

[NightmareExpress]

Some of the most heinous murderers stem from the days of Pong.
Some of the worst war criminals precede video games altogether.

To combat violence, you do not aim at things such as books, games and expressions of ideas and speech...you need to target what is fundamentally wrong in the first place. Human nature. You can't eradicate it entirely (there will always be violence so long as there is sentient life), but you can make existence more tolerable.

Why do children turn down the wrong paths in life?
Why are some families horrendously poor? Why is there abuse? Why is there bullying? Why must some live in constant fear? Why are the mentally ill despised and alienated? Those are the questions that you must first find a concrete answer to and then rectify to the best of your ability. All it takes to kill someone is a reason, however petty that reason may be.

I'm fairly certain that guns too are not the issue, but a means to an end.
In a utopia, everyone could be armed to the teeth and you'd be seeing one spur of the moment shooting or drunken mishap every decade or so because the average person wouldn't have the need or desire to turn their gun on a fellow citizen. But alas, the states is no utopia nor is any area of the world. It is much easier to look at the things further down the line and ignore the real causation; because we may be to blame. Did the passing of my legislation drive this man to commit suicide? No, he was just mentally ill and a statistic. Did the apathy towards bullying lead to this suicide/shooting? No, that tyke just played video games.

That's my two cents on the issue.
I don't really care if politicians link games to violence, because they probably can contribute just as any other expressive medium, but I do get flustered when they exhibit such gross ignorance as to what really drags this world down. Focusing down the little things as they do is just lazy.

 

[BoogieManFL]

--snip--

I think a more important question is whether it's even possible to be objective about this kind of thing. There's a fun Douglas Adams quote: "Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. Anything that's invented between when you're fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things."
By that logic there will probably be some new trend, by the time we're Feinstein's age, which we don't fully understand and doesn't fit in our own view of the world. My point being: we're all affected by biases dependent on what age group we're in. And I don't think it's fair or legitimate to fault someone for something which we're all susceptible to.

You're reading far to much in to the one aspect of my post, it's something meant more in passing than how I genuinely believe. I am just sick of idiots running the show. I'm tired of people spouting off nonsense that is outright wrong and is in no way a proven fact. However what I said seems more likely than people being forced to retire for being an idiot as sad as that is.

There have been people with something wrong in there head going off and killing a bunch of people long before guns existed, and centuries before video games existed. Comic books used to be the devil. Dungeons and Dragons used to be the devil. Now video games are the devil. I find it infuriating how someone can jump up a take a stance of something they personally know nothing about and aren't even using any factual data to justify it.

I don't know about you, but having people like that in important positions in our society is shocking to say the least.

WHY is it so DAMN hard for these people to look at the real fact that some people are just messed up in the head. We should be looking into preventative psychological help instead of crying about something that isn't even the cause and even if it were somehow removed entirely it wouldn't stop it.

It infuriates me how simple minded these people are. Really? You sat down and thought about the issue and that is what you came up with as the cause and fix? How the hell did you get where you are, how do you deserve it? Because from my perspective you shouldn't be in your position. People have went on killing sprees throughout all of human history. Guns and games have existed for a very tiny fraction of that time.

 

[Not G. Ivingname]

Why was I born in this state? >_<

Every attempt at banning the real ones failed, so no Feinstein is going after the fake ones!

Didn't we just have a California video game censorship bill shot down by THE. SUPREME. COURT?

snip

Spoiler: Breath in, breath out

Look at Fluttershy.

Feel better?

 

[Not G. Ivingname]

She's right of course. And thanks to Amateur Surgeon I'm now opening my own clinic, Mortal Combat has made me a Black Belt, and Dead Space has made me a Master Engineer.

 

[KingsGambit_v1legacy]

Everyone else says guns are "murder enablers" but they're legal. So are shooting ranges. And hunting.

Then you have archery, fencing, boxing, martial arts, all legal. Get over yourself old woman, stay in politics and out of entertainment.

 

[ShermTank7272]

Don't know if this has been posted yet, but the Colbert Report had some great commentary on video game violence a few days ago: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/425350/april-10-2013/tip-wag---gun-edition---united-nations--senate-republicans---video-games

 

[Something Amyss]

Everyone else says guns are "murder enablers" but they're legal. So are shooting ranges. And hunting.

Then you have archery, fencing, boxing, martial arts, all legal. Get over yourself old woman, stay in politics and out of entertainment.

It be fair, I imagine we need shooting ranges to practice defending ourselves against all the FPS players.

They're coming for us, you know.

 

[bl4ckh4wk64]

Tell me miss Feinstein, were you always this shortsighted/desperate for attention or did you have to train by playing videogames?

Naw, she's always been this way. It's one of the reasons why I've been trying to vote her out of office every single election. She's a hypocrite and a complete liar, but the press in California refuses to publish anything about it.

 

[Cecilthedarkknight_234]

"First Amendment rights protection! Come at me bro!" ~Violent Videogames.

Are video games art or a valid form of freedom of expression?? All it would take is enough people in office to vote nay or say they do stand up to the miller test, and we would have a huge issue on our hands. That alone could strip a lot video games the same protection as books, movies/animation and other legit forms of art have which we all enjoy.

"I of course think games are worthy of 1st amendment protection"