The two sentiments here seem to be directly contradicting each other. "It has an end" is all fine and well, but if the flip side is that if we are seeing them draw out that end perpetually to make way for yearly sequels, then we will never see that end. It doesn't matter if it's there creatively, because we will never see it.
Really all this is telling me is "When the series is finally no longer profitable they may make one last game to tie it up, then when people actually buy that one to see how it ends, the series will become profitable again, and Ubi will demand more sequels."
Really all this is telling me is "When the series is finally no longer profitable they may make one last game to tie it up, then when people actually buy that one to see how it ends, the series will become profitable again, and Ubi will demand more sequels."