How could it be destructive? Books and songs have been re-written before, and their industries aren't exactly crumbling.LetalisK said:and don't entirely understand the destructive nature such a legal precedent would have on the industry.
Let's not forget that the United States has almost 10 million square miles of area. It's different to say something that stays true for the whole country.Snotnarok said:Go read the story about the guy writing about how nice america is and how he got shot by a random person while he was hitchhiking.
That's exactly the problem. One of the defenses for the ending was "you are sad that you didn't get a happy ending/the ending you wanted".RaikuFA said:It might have helped if you told people what you were upset about or what you wanted.
OniaPL said:You are just throwing a fit because the ending did not cater to your tastes.
LetalisK said:get legal revenge for something they don't like
Pretty much anything and everything they say in interviews and show off pre-release is 'subject to change', so that interview does nothing whatsoever for the argument.BlindWorg said:I'll just leave two things right here, too bad the people who filed the complain didnt apparently show these.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPelM2hwhJA
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2012/01/10/mass1525-effect-3-cas5ey-fdsafdhudson-interviewae.aspx?PostPageIndex=2 (first question of the interview)
Edit-tastic: I love when Casey claims that ME3 ending will be more complex than ME2's intricate flowchart of who is loyal, tech/biotic expert, leadership, defensive value points and ship upgrades.
As you all know, in reality ME3 only looks how much the EMS score is and unlocks and gives alterations to the final cutscene as the number goes up. Only thing from previous games that affect that if the Collector Base is blown or radiated and that only changes the order on how the endings unlock as the score goes up.
That, if nothing else, is outright lying.
Okay, lets compare.Snotnarok said:I can't believe that people are still whining about the ending.
Go read the story about the guy writing about how nice america is and how he got shot by a random person while he was hitchhiking. What kind of control did he have over that.
And the ending really wasn't that bad, it wasn't great but come on. Let's compare it to this
They also haven't been better for it. It's not the role of government censorship to foster artistic expression, both grand and horrible.ElPatron said:How could it be destructive? Books and songs have been re-written before, and their industries aren't exactly crumbling.LetalisK said:and don't entirely understand the destructive nature such a legal precedent would have on the industry.
But that's exactly what is going on. Saying this was false advertising is nothing but a red herring so that their revenge through the legal system looks justified. The game gave you choices at the end and the choices you made did effect the outcome. It was a shitty and half-assed three endings with a binary 4 second optional cutscene at the end, but it was still there. So in the end it does come down to personal taste and how far someone is willing to go to get retribution for having that taste violated.That's exactly the problem. One of the defenses for the ending was "you are sad that you didn't get a happy ending/the ending you wanted".
If we try to say what we wanted for ME3 we get accused of wanting to disrupt their "artistic integrity".
Case in point:
OniaPL said:You are just throwing a fit because the ending did not cater to your tastes.LetalisK said:get legal revenge for something they don't like
...what does a random guy getting shot have to do with this? and to be fair, the ending of megaman was more then that.Snotnarok said:I can't believe that people are still whining about the ending.
Go read the story about the guy writing about how nice america is and how he got shot by a random person while he was hitchhiking. What kind of control did he have over that.
And the ending really wasn't that bad, it wasn't great but come on. Let's compare it to this
To me, RME was one of the biggest messes in gaming consumer rights. The most difficult thing was finding out what exactly made you mad about. Take a look at 100,000 Strong or Rainfall, a 5 minite google search will tell what they wanted. Looking for RME reasons is a needle in a haystack. Heck I was even told it on a blog which I think was your actual site but I don't know. Why? Cause when I brought it up I was met with people telling me I was wrong and I don't get it. And when I ask what is the true issue, I'm met with basically "Look at the time, I left my meatloaf in the oven."ElPatron said:How could it be destructive? Books and songs have been re-written before, and their industries aren't exactly crumbling.LetalisK said:and don't entirely understand the destructive nature such a legal precedent would have on the industry.
Let's not forget that the United States has almost 10 million square miles of area. It's different to say something that stays true for the whole country.Snotnarok said:Go read the story about the guy writing about how nice america is and how he got shot by a random person while he was hitchhiking.
That's exactly the problem. One of the defenses for the ending was "you are sad that you didn't get a happy ending/the ending you wanted".RaikuFA said:It might have helped if you told people what you were upset about or what you wanted.
If we try to say what we wanted for ME3 we get accused of wanting to disrupt their "artistic integrity".
Case in point:
OniaPL said:You are just throwing a fit because the ending did not cater to your tastes.LetalisK said:get legal revenge for something they don't like
Hit up youtube. There are plenty of videos explaining it, many with over 10 reasons why the ending sucked and didn't actually live up to the claims that were made before release.RaikuFA said:The most difficult thing was finding out what exactly made you mad about.
Sure, it violated my tastes because I wanted a purple explosion.LetalisK said:But that's exactly what is going on. Saying this was false advertising is nothing but a red herring so that their revenge through the legal system looks justified. The game gave you choices at the end and the choices you made did effect the outcome. It was a shitty and half-assed three endings with a binary 4 second optional cutscene at the end, but it was still there. So in the end it does come down to personal taste and how far someone is willing to go to get retribution for having that taste violated.
Two very weak strawman arguments there.Snotnarok said:I can't believe that people are still whining about the ending.
Go read the story about the guy writing about how nice america is and how he got shot by a random person while he was hitchhiking. What kind of control did he have over that.
And the ending really wasn't that bad, it wasn't great but come on. Let's compare it to this
No idea which image you're referencing, but the Who's Line motivational poster made me LOL.008Zulu said:Found this image a while back, thought it was funny as hell;
http://browse.deviantart.com/?qh=§ion=&global=1&q=mass+effect#/d4sv254
Maybe it's just me, but it seems Bioware doesn't like giving out happy endings.