UK Atheists Hope to Eliminate Jedi Population

Mad1Cow

New member
Jan 8, 2011
364
0
0
Geo Da Sponge said:
Conor147 said:
Geo Da Sponge said:
You know belief doesn't work in percentages, right?

"if you are exactly 50% sure there is/isnt a god. then youre an indecisive coward."

Yeah, because if you take the logical position of not commiting to either side of an unresolved argument then you're a coward.
"You know belief doesn't work in percentages, right?"

what do you mean it doesnt work in percentages? it just did.

you arent honestly saying that its not possible to not be 100% sure about something are you?

oh dear.....



"Yeah, because if you take the logical position of not commiting to either side of an unresolved argument then you're a coward."

the existence of aliens is an unresolved argument. check.

so you are 50% sure that aliens exist? check.

alright then. lets see how your model for belief works.


oh look!....here is some evidence that there are thousands of earth-like planets in a tiny part of the observable universe. we didnt know about this 5 minutes ago! the chance of aliens existing has now increased 10 fold!!!!!

wait, what? you still only believe the chance of aliens existing is 50%, because it is as of yet, unresolved?

BUT THATS EXACTLY WHAT YOU THOUGHT BEFORE WE FOUND THIS MASSIVE AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING. HOW CAN YOU NOT HAVE CHANGED YOUR MIND AT ALL???

durrrrrrrrrr.

you need to think about this a bit more. this is insane. your model of belief simply doesnt work at all. i think you should just admit im right and that you were being silly.
You seem to have confused 'belief' with 'likelihood'. Saying you believe in something 100% is a figure of speech. With belief you either believe or you don't, or you don't believe either way. The chances of something happening are completely unrelated to whether or not you believe in them. You can't 'believe' something is 50% likely, presenting the probability is a form of analysis and as such has absolutely nothing to do with belief. You can think something is 50% likely, but you can't have 50% belief.

In the case of believing in aliens, people's belief is completely removed from any analysis of what planets are inhabitable and so on. Another example, the chance of me rolling a one on a six sided die is one in six, but that doesn't mean I believe in that one 16.6667%. In any case, analysing the probability of a God is impossible, as we have absolutely no concept of how often a God exists in a universe.

CrimsonBlack said:
I was using an extreme example in the vein of Bonhoeffer (EDIT: I actually meant Niemoeller). You can replace Vice and Virtue Squad with American Theodicy if you like. And yes, I object strongly to religious violence such as female genital mutilation, beatings, or honour killings. I object strongly to any kind of horrible unsubstantiated moral code which is allowed to continue under the guise of cultural relativism (in the UK, no less!). I strongly object to any religion which intends to foist, through subtle means or otherwise, their opinions and way of life on me. It amazes me that anyone would want that. That's why if you're not religious you should tick the "no religion" box. :)

I meant exactly what I wrote, it requires no rewording - which was that, in my experience, agnostics are less likely to get riled up about religious issues. Atheists and theists have conviction of their (non)belief and thus are more likely to fight for them. I'm not saying agnostics wouldn't or don't care. I just don't want to end up living in a state where I am (viciously) sanctioned for doing what comes naturally to me (I'm bisexual, and have had sex outside marriage).
Well it seems we actually agree mostly. I just felt that while an agnostic would not object to the underlying belief of a religious person, they would be just as likely to object to their actions. It ceases to be a matter of belief when it comes to their actions.
I would like to point out, you have just put down how I feel mostly about the matter, I just fail at english ¬_¬

You can believe in elements of a religion though, that's something that needs to be considered. STILL not a percentage but you can believe in bits of a religion, like taking all the "LET HE CAST THE STONE IF HE IS FREE OF SIN" phrases to heart and following them but thinking that gays are monsters is ridiculous. However again that's just an opinion, scrutinise as you will...
 

Bobzer77

New member
May 14, 2008
717
0
0
icaritos said:
Bobzer77 said:
icaritos said:
Bobzer77 said:
It seems definitive, "The annoying atheists that are stuck up and condescending" can't take a joke.

Jedi ftw.
I think the ones making the joke here are mostly Atheists. It doesn't matter what your belief is, there will always be uptight assholes. Also come the census, I'm a Jedi.
Fix'd
Huh ok, I don't remember being rude towards you but whatever.
Weird, I don't remember being rude towards you either....
 

NickCooley

New member
Sep 19, 2009
425
0
0
I'm disappointed Escapist Staff. This news story has been purposefully reported in a manner which completely skews the views and intentions of these "UK Atheists" and the gullible morons that only read the title and commented aren't helping either. They have no intention of stamping out the "Jedi Religion" only that people fill in the Census correctly so the Government can make decisions based on accurate information about the population. You know, kinda like what the Census is for in the first place?

tl;dr Don't judge the people of my country when you don't have a fucking clue what they actually mean.
 

Conor147

New member
Mar 10, 2011
91
0
0
Geo Da Sponge said:
Conor147 said:
Geo Da Sponge said:
You know belief doesn't work in percentages, right?

"if you are exactly 50% sure there is/isnt a god. then youre an indecisive coward."

Yeah, because if you take the logical position of not commiting to either side of an unresolved argument then you're a coward.
"You know belief doesn't work in percentages, right?"

what do you mean it doesnt work in percentages? it just did.

you arent honestly saying that its not possible to not be 100% sure about something are you?

oh dear.....



"Yeah, because if you take the logical position of not commiting to either side of an unresolved argument then you're a coward."

the existence of aliens is an unresolved argument. check.

so you are 50% sure that aliens exist? check.

alright then. lets see how your model for belief works.


oh look!....here is some evidence that there are thousands of earth-like planets in a tiny part of the observable universe. we didnt know about this 5 minutes ago! the chance of aliens existing has now increased 10 fold!!!!!

wait, what? you still only believe the chance of aliens existing is 50%, because it is as of yet, unresolved?

BUT THATS EXACTLY WHAT YOU THOUGHT BEFORE WE FOUND THIS MASSIVE AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING. HOW CAN YOU NOT HAVE CHANGED YOUR MIND AT ALL???

durrrrrrrrrr.

you need to think about this a bit more. this is insane. your model of belief simply doesnt work at all. i think you should just admit im right and that you were being silly.
You seem to have confused 'belief' with 'likelihood'. Saying you believe in something 100% is a figure of speech. With belief you either believe or you don't, or you don't believe either way. The chances of something happening are completely unrelated to whether or not you believe in them. You can't 'believe' something is 50% likely, presenting the probability is a form of analysis and as such has absolutely nothing to do with belief. You can think something is 50% likely, but you can't have 50% belief.

In the case of believing in aliens, people's belief is completely removed from any analysis of what planets are inhabitable and so on. Another example, the chance of me rolling a one on a six sided die is one in six, but that doesn't mean I believe in that one 16.6667%. In any case, analysing the probability of a God is impossible, as we have absolutely no concept of how often a God exists in a universe.
no i have definitely NOT confused belief with likelihood. as i asserted, belief is dependant on likelihood. when i say "believe 50%" i mean "believe the likelihood is 50%". it was only shorthand and i think you know this and are just trying to throw a red herring. i believe it was actually you that has confused belief with likelihood, as i demonstrated with my hypothetical that is both valid and sound and as of yet unrefuted.

which of my premises were false and/or how was my conclusion not inferred by my premises?
 

Conor147

New member
Mar 10, 2011
91
0
0
Mad1Cow said:
Conor147 said:
Haakong said:
Whats for sure is your lack of faith is disturbing :D
i.e. you are jelly and mad because you have spent your life collecting retarded superstitions for which there is no evidential justification and you are now butthurt at me because im glad my parents didnt brainwash me into not caring about or undersanding the difference between evidence and non-evidence (faith).
Clearly you do not see the appropriate use of humour here.
i do see it. try reading the rest of our dialogue.

context. it helps.
 

Conor147

New member
Mar 10, 2011
91
0
0
Haakong said:
Cmon! Now youre serving me oppurtunities to use these! :D
i like how youre pretending i didnt understand so you can explain it to me instead of addressing what i said.
 

Mad1Cow

New member
Jan 8, 2011
364
0
0
Haakong said:
Mad1Cow said:
Conor147 said:
Haakong said:
Whats for sure is your lack of faith is disturbing :D
i.e. you are jelly and mad because you have spent your life collecting retarded superstitions for which there is no evidential justification and you are now butthurt at me because im glad my parents didnt brainwash me into not caring about or undersanding the difference between evidence and non-evidence (faith).
Clearly you do not see the appropriate use of humour here.
Im just waiting for more replies from him/her/it. This is fun! :D
Does this mean I can get popcorn? CLEARLY this is the work of gods...
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
from now on out I am a follower of the Jedi ways

and I unabashedly announce that I love all 6 Star Wars films
 

General Vengeance

New member
Aug 26, 2009
187
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
The group running the "You're Not a Jedi [http://www.yourenotajedi.com/]" campaign claims that "Jedi" is not an acceptable religion and hopes that people will check "No Religion" in the census instead of saying that they follow the ways of the Force.
What is an acceptable religion then? While this group is at it, maybe a good ol' fashioned book burning is in order as well?

Religion poisons everything ~ Christopher Hitchens
 

Mad1Cow

New member
Jan 8, 2011
364
0
0
Conor147 said:
Mad1Cow said:
Conor147 said:
Haakong said:
Whats for sure is your lack of faith is disturbing :D
i.e. you are jelly and mad because you have spent your life collecting retarded superstitions for which there is no evidential justification and you are now butthurt at me because im glad my parents didnt brainwash me into not caring about or undersanding the difference between evidence and non-evidence (faith).
Clearly you do not see the appropriate use of humour here.
i do see it. try reading the rest of our dialogue.

context. it helps.
Try picking up the part where I stopped caring at debates and start applauding the guy for appropriate use of humour...

Laughter. It helps.
 

Washboard

Dyslexics of the world...UNTIE!
Dec 17, 2008
356
0
0
Im putting Sith,there are too many jedis about. Someone needs to bring balance to the force!
 

Conor147

New member
Mar 10, 2011
91
0
0
Mad1Cow said:
Try picking up the part where I stopped caring at debates and start applauding the guy for appropriate use of humour...
Laughter. It helps.
do whatever the fuck you want. just dont assume that because im not amused by an obvious bad joke (that is essentially just him grasping at straws in the midst of losing an argument) that the cliched, banal, pseudo-humour was lost on me.

like i said, context. it helps.

it especially helps seeing as the joke has already been used at least 5 times this thread..... what do they say about people that laugh after everyone has finished laughing?
 

Chameliondude

New member
Jul 21, 2009
212
0
0
I can see why they are doing it, as the boxes can be checked by computers, but the written bit will have to be checked by people - boring

And it means they have to include the jedi as religeous people in statistics, as they have claimed allegiance to a religeon, tis distorts completely the result gained.

Still f***in hilarious though, pastafarians unite.
 

Mad1Cow

New member
Jan 8, 2011
364
0
0
Conor147 said:
Mad1Cow said:
Try picking up the part where I stopped caring at debates and start applauding the guy for appropriate use of humour...
Laughter. It helps.
do whatever the fuck you want. just dont assume that because im not amused by an obvious bad joke that is essentially just him grasping at straws in the midst of losing an argument that the cliched, banal, pseudo-humour was lost on me.

like i said, context. it helps.
As I say you're obviously trying to win a war with someone who doesn't even care about fighting anymore. It wasn't so much the fact that you weren't laughing it was more the I WANNA CONTINUE ON THIS ARGUMENT BECAUSE I'M RIGHT AND YOUR WRONG!!! This is why I took the route in life of, "fine, if it helps, I'll let you believe you're right, just let me go back to my fun". He's not grasping at straws in the midst of losing an argument, he doesn't care about the argument, he's taken his straws, walked out the boxing ring and started making jokes with his straw. I can't help but laugh over this matter which brings me back to my point...

Laughter. It helps =P
 

Geo Da Sponge

New member
May 14, 2008
2,611
0
0
Conor147 said:
no i have definitely NOT confused belief with likelihood. as i asserted, belief is dependant on likelihood. when i say "believe 50%" i mean "believe the likelihood is 50%". it was only shorthand and i think you know this and are just trying to throw a red herring. i believe it was actually you that has confused belief with likelihood, as i demonstrated with my hypothetical that is both valid and sound and as of yet unrefuted.

which of my premises were false and/or how was my conclusion not inferred by my premises?
If belief is dependent on likelihood, does that not imply that theists are right? After all, they believe the hardest.

Joking aside, are you just throwing out words about debate at random and hoping for the best? A premise has to be built around something which we both accept as true, and for best effect has to be provably true. The only one you have given so far is that the search for alien life is unresolved. You then follow this by saying "so you are 50% sure that aliens exist?". No. I am 0% sure, because I have no belief. The actual percentage probability of there being intelligent alien life is down to the number of planets with inhabitable atmospheres, and as such our estimate of this probability can be changed by the new evidence found as in the case you give ("here is some evidence that there are thousands of earth-like planets in a tiny part of the observable universe"). My belief may be swayed by this, but even then it will be moved from "I don't believe in intelligent alien life" to "I do believe in intelligent alien life". The only possible intermediary stage would be an internal conflict of whether I believe or not.

Do I therefore believe "the likelihood is 50%"? No. I have no idea what the actual probability of there being alien life out there is, but it probably isn't exactly 50% anyway. If someone were to tell me the probability is exactly 90% and they could prove it, my belief may be swayed by this as I described above. But belief can just as easily be used to defy probability. Anyone who has played Warhammer 40K and uttered the immortal phrase "Anything but a one to pass" can attest to this. In this case, the probability of rolling a one is 1/6, naturally. But you can still believe it will happen. However, in the case of religion this is all a moot point anyway as there is absolutely no way to calculate the probability of a God.

The only way belief could work as a percentage is as a binary system, that is to say 100% being 1 belief (believing something is true) and 0% being 0 belief (having no belief). Even then this is leaving out all possible developments of your personal belief. For example, believing there is a God but he doesn't take the forms given by any religion and as such it is an overly simplistic way to view things.
 

Blindswordmaster

New member
Dec 28, 2009
3,145
0
0
Wow, now are they actually against Jediism as a religion, or just asking that only the truly faithful make their mark as Jedi. This is a very important distinction, one is just accurate accounting, the other amounts to religious discrimination and great disrespect to the religions that Jedi draws from, namely Buddhism and Taoism.