If I were a legislator in the UK, I would want people to not lie on their census form for the sake of being ironic and contrary.Ghengis John said:If I were in the UK I would be sure to tick the box for Jedi precisely because a bunch of smug, uptight jerks didn't want me to. They can't even ask for help without being derisive.The issue is that the UK government could be getting the wrong idea about the amount of people within its borders that are religiously devout, versus those that just like to hold a lightsaber on the weekends. If Jediism has actually become a religion for you, sure, go ahead and write "Jedi" in the census. If not, it might be best to check "No Religion." The latter is probably the smartest move anyway, just in case a Sith Lord rises to power and decides to eliminate the competition.
I'd make the comment, but others have done it so well:AgDr_ODST said:UK atheists need to get the big sticks stuck up there asses forcibly removed!! its a joke you uptight bastards! Besides most of the people claiming to be into 'Jedism' are probably nonreligious but they decide to say otherwise for a laugh
GodofCider said:As strange an idea as it is, an accurate census 'actually' helps things flow better. As opposed to many comments upon this thread reading this the wrong way(Likely intentionally, for whatever reason), perhaps we can not try and mangle the polls with petty, though amusing, jokes.
To recap, joking around is not for census forms. That's just irresponsible.b3nn3tt said:This. While I can see why people who don't understand the census would find this funny, this actually skews the government's data quite a bit. For instance, if the government is looking to make a new school, and they have the choice to make it religious (eg. C of E) or non-religious, they will check the census for how the local area feels about religion. If the census says 60% religious (for example) then they would probably opt for a religious school. Now, if half of that 60% is made up of people who put 'Jedi' as their religion for a joke, then I doubt that they'd be too happy about this situationSteve5513 said:But it does.Caliostro said:Honestly, shut the fuck up people (the guys in that "movement", not Tom, obviously).
It's all the same nonsense. It should never matter for any government functions whether people have any religion at all, so the fact that it's included in a census is rubbish anyways.
Personally I say go for the high score guys. 50% Jedi or bust.
Pastafarians or Adeptus Astartes also acceptable.
It's stuff like this that gives the government an idea of what to do in the local area. This is also the kind of stuff used to justify more religious faith schools.
Obviously, I don't know how often this happens, but this is the kind of thing the census is used for. By all means, everyone is entitled to put whatever they like on their census form, but they then have absolutely no right to complain if a government decision goes against them based on what they put as a joke
Personally, I'll be choosing no religion
Uh...Srdjan said:Fuck you atheists, it's either inquisition-style pious society or religious freedom to all. If you haven't found your god doesn't mean someone can't find his in SF movie.
I don't coolerthanice, I just don't know.coolerthanice21 said:Seriously, their not saying that no one should believe in Jediism. Their saying that LYING on a census form gives the government inaccurate information that they base decisions off of. Why are so many people not understanding that?!
Again, people who want to use a deity as an embodiment of a set of rules by which to live life have every right to do so, assuming that doesn't include stuff like child sacrifices or anything. The government shouldn't take that from them. Churches should be permitted as a place to congregate, and pray, ow whatever else they want to do. However, if someone like a priest, bishop or the Pope want to use their position to project their own views onto others and threaten them with hell if they don't adopt this new rule, that shouldn't be allowed, whether the view is that you shouldn't use condoms, shouldn't eat pork, shouldn't play stringed instruments, any of this crap. Thats basically brainwashing, the same goes for if they use it to get people to give them money, or slaughter the unbelievers, etc. Atheism as I've experienced it doesn't tend to do that.Baby Tea said:That isn't the fault of religion, that's the fault of the people preying on others.Random berk said:If you want to gain power by telling people that Allah will reward them if they blow themselves up in a crowded street, then you should be stopped. Don't tell me you find that 'disgusting'.
*The same goes for Christianity and the Crusades, I just use muslim suicide bombers because its more relevant today.
Should we blame atheism for Stalin's murder of tens of thousands of priests, nuns, monks, and believers?
No! The guy was a lunatic, and used what he could to get people to do what he wanted.
Same with the lunatics who use religion to inflict pain and suffering on others.
There are millions of people in the world who are affiliated with some religious worldview who have no problem or issue with other people in their separate beliefs. What about them? I find it hard to fathom why you, or anyone, could truly advocate the stamping out of organized religion for those who peacefully enjoy their faith.
Such zealous anti-theism is a direct parallel to those extremists you can't stand.
Go on, do it.2fish said:I serve Khaine and the Laughing god. Do not tempt me chaos scum.
What if half of that 60% is made up of people who put 'Hindu' seriously? Are they still going to establish a C of E religious school?b3nn3tt said:For instance, if the government is looking to make a new school, and they have the choice to make it religious (eg. C of E) or non-religious, they will check the census for how the local area feels about religion. If the census says 60% religious (for example) then they would probably opt for a religious school. Now, if half of that 60% is made up of people who put 'Jedi' as their religion for a joke, then I doubt that they'd be too happy about this situation
Cuz people tend to read the titles to things and then comment. Seen it time and time again.coolerthanice21 said:Seriously, their not saying that no one should believe in Jediism. Their saying that LYING on a census form gives the government inaccurate information that they base decisions off of. Why are so many people not understanding that?!
I've always found it disturbing that people keep mentioning FSM, but never praise Her Pinkness.ultimateownage said:Damn right, too. Everyone knows the only true religion is the religion of the Invisible Pink Unicorn.
Thinking with your gut there, citizen! I like it! No facts! No news! All that's needed is "UK Atheists telling people not to put Jedi as their religion in the census," and that's all the information a gut needs to make a wise, informed decision about a people united behind the despicable flag of Atheism, and reject all subsequent arguments. If facts want to be believed, they should make an effort to get there on time, and if the gut knows one thing, it's that lazy facts cannot and should not be tolerated.HT_Black said:I'm pretty sure this is why nobody likes atheists. I mean...seriously. What's their damned problem?
Out of curiosity, where does the pen fall on that scale?Battenbergcake said:Tell you what, if we break into all out holy war over this, my money's on those who carry the light sabers.
The laser sword afterall is mightier then the regular sword.