Not stupid just illogical,SinisterGehe said:
If he is guilty throw the book at him if not let him go hoping one way or the other won't change wether he did it or not.
Edited for absurd typos
UK Police Arrest Teen Over Call of Duty Hacking
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
If he is guilty throw the book at him if not let him go hoping one way or the other won't change wether he did it or not.
Edited for absurd typos
Read what I said you tit!Pirate Kitty said:
I don't want him to be ANYTHING
Wanting him to be guilty is stupid
wanting him to be not guilty is stupid
I dont know any other way I can say it, this is the simpelest laguage I can put it in, I would've though that SOMEONE would've been able to fucking read and understand a not-very-difficult-to-understand concept!
You see now you've gone and got my dander up.
I'm sure it's already been pointed out how a pacifist is not someone who actually believes this.Very big difference between cheats and hacks. Cheating is against the rules. Hacking is against the law. Nothing unusual here tbh, denying someone the use of a product they bought is perfectly normal to be against the law, it'd be as if someone came to your house and cut your internet cable.Zhukov said:
Fair enough, no wants him to be guilty, and if he is proved innocent then that is brilliant, however, given the evidence and their sources we can say that odds are he is and will be found guilty of the crime, in which case he does deserve some sort of punishment, if only to dissuade him from attempting things like this in the future.Pirate Kitty said:
No, it doesn't. I cut out stupid since that has nothing to do with anything and by focusing on the moral, we could define your immorality as you hoping he gets punished hard, before knowing whether he's guilty or not. I will answer the questions you asked, cutting out the unrelated provocative ones. Yes, you are being immoral by the previous set definition. You're allowed to have an opinion, but if you express it, you have to face the fact that people might disagree and have every bit as much right as you do to express it.SinisterGehe said:
And now to the good part, your logical fallacy. No matter the outcome, no matter if he's guilty or not, you're still immoral for wanting him to suffer before knowing for certain. It doesn't make a difference if you're right or wrong, and it certainly doesn't make him immoral for calling you immoral. That part makes no sense. If he's innocent it doesn't make you any more immoral than if he's guilty.
Yeah, that logic is incredibly flawed. Not his though, but yours. He never said he didn't want him to be guilty, nor did he even imply it. Saying you don't want someone to be guilty doesn't mean you're saying you want them not to be. Also, wanting him to be innocent is absurd if you count having any strong emotion for a complete stranger is absurd.Pirate Kitty said:
I think I love you. You're just awesome.moretimethansense said:
I like the fact that as the internet becomes a larger part of everyones lives there are now laws which protect people. What was recently in a paper I read today was how they are trying to crack down on internet stalkers and bring in laws to protect those affected by said internet stalkers.
Activision spotted his registered account doing this, the police then traced this account of instance back to his IP and location.... Honestly, what're the odds he's not guilty?88chaz88 said:
He so deserves that, there are always people cheating or being annoying pathetic pricks on Call of Duty. This should at least set an example for other people who like to cheat.
Thats not the pacifist belief, you may not like to exhibit a violent demeanor but pacifists are people who will not tolerate nor condone violence in all of it's forms. You're just someone who simply doesn't use physical violence, but that doesn't mean you're a pacifist.kouriichi said:
