Universal Porn Filter Coming to the U.K.

[ninjaRiv]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Except you're forgetting one big part of this; the internet offers everyone the ability to express themselves. Who in the government is deciding what counts as porn? Hardcore butt fucking that you can buy in the local porn shop? Or is it the tastefully artistic nude art that can be found online? Beauty with titties. Because that exists, man. Art and porn can be the same thing and both are forms of self expression. it really has nothing to do with pirating porn AT ALL and pretty much everyone here has said so, I think.

You may not care but I'm sure the people who use the internet to express themselves artistically care.

I guess i missed the point where a woman taking 2 cocks up her arse is considered art. Im sure there are plenty of sad lonely men looking at their PC right now seeing it as useless now porn is gone. You seem to find this a big issue, fine, i find it sad really.

Again you've ignored points already made for the sake of sarcasm.

What about Michelangelo's David? If that were built now, would it count as porn?

Besides the artist side, I think the biggest problem here may be the government censorship. That's... Not a serious issue to you? To have regular, ok porn censored by the government without putting it to public vote? Kinda like they did with books and films.

 

[ClockworkPenguin]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Have you considered that there may be possible implications of this that you hadn't picked up on. You seem to argue 'I don't use porn, porn use isn't a right, stop whining'. However, the thing other people are saying is where is the line drawn? Much of the rhetoric has used phrases like 'obscene material' or 'extreme and objectionable content'. Which sounds like it means terrible things no-one should want to see anyway.

But in Russia, would include anything that told homosexuals they weren't evil deviants. It could arguably mean anything that would be post watershed on telly is restricted. It could easily be expanded to things wholly unconnected to pornography or sex. Amnesty uploads footage of violent human rights abuses. That's very graphic, can't let kids see that can we.

The real worry is that it provides the government with the infrastructure to engage in a more general censorship of the internet.

edit: to clarify, I'm talking about the rhetoric used by politicians and media involved, not this debate

 

[Shamanic Rhythm]

This was proposed in Australia a few years ago by our thankfully now ex-Minister of Communications. Every major ISP very rightfully pointed out that a filter would: a) slow download speeds by up to 30%, b)not be effective enough to block 100% of porn, c) block many legitimate sites by accident.

 

[Dragoon]

Well this is to be perfectly honest a load of a crap but I'm going to leave this petition [http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746] here if anyone is interested.

I just signed the petition, this country is going to the dogs with tossers like Cameron running it. Why should the government have the power to decide what's right and wrong for our children? It wouldn't be too bad if it was an Opt-in program but to have everyone in by default takes away our power to choose, democracy my ass I like how nothing has been said about his law until it had already been passed.

 

[SquidSponge]

Short version - what a load of shite. I love how he's trying conflate pornography with illegal activity by dragging child pornography into an issue about the benign, legal kind - thus falsely implying an association between the two - to confuse the average citizen into thinking this is a good idea. Wonderful obfuscation work there, he should give his spin doctors a pay raise.

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Except you're forgetting one big part of this; the internet offers everyone the ability to express themselves. Who in the government is deciding what counts as porn? Hardcore butt fucking that you can buy in the local porn shop? Or is it the tastefully artistic nude art that can be found online? Beauty with titties. Because that exists, man. Art and porn can be the same thing and both are forms of self expression. it really has nothing to do with pirating porn AT ALL and pretty much everyone here has said so, I think.

You may not care but I'm sure the people who use the internet to express themselves artistically care.

I guess i missed the point where a woman taking 2 cocks up her arse is considered art. Im sure there are plenty of sad lonely men looking at their PC right now seeing it as useless now porn is gone. You seem to find this a big issue, fine, i find it sad really.

Again you've ignored points already made for the sake of sarcasm.

What about Michelangelo's David? If that were built now, would it count as porn?

Besides the artist side, I think the biggest problem here may be the government censorship. That's... Not a serious issue to you? To have regular, ok porn censored by the government without putting it to public vote? Kinda like they did with books and films.

Michelangelos David wasnt made for people to go "wow, what a huge cock". I dont think you know what art is, think your confusing nudity and porn. Being nude doesnt mean its porn. Anyway, dont care, i really dont care at all about porn. If they banned all porn....dont care. Movies and books have strict codes that state you cant show certain things. As in porn is fine. Violence is fine. Porn with violence is not fine. If you want to see to people fucking, then your fine, your needs are met.

 

[CrystalShadow]

give more power to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Center to investigate "secretive file-sharing networks," create a secure database of child pornography that will help police trace illegal content and the people who look at it, and criminalize the possession of "rape porn."

Define "rape porn". Filmed rape? A porn actress who pretends to be raped? Tentacle hentai? Bodice-ripper romance novels? Nice vague term to use as a bludgeon.

If it's anything like the way Australia defines 'child pornography', expect lots of stupid stuff.

What's the definition you ask?
Well, the definition of child porn they work with is... any pornographic material where anyone involved looks to be under the age of 18...

Note the emphasis on looks, not facts. Even if it can be demonstrably proven that everyone involved was over 18, it can still be called child pornography based solely on some arbitrary standards of appearance.

Never mind the fact that it's actually nearly impossible to meaningfully judge a person's age in the 16-30 range based solely on their appearance... No.

One commonly noted side effect of the arbitrary standards being applied is that any porn involving a woman with small breasts (especially a cup or smaller) can easily be banned on the argument that it 'looks' like child pornography.

They've effectively banned small boobs. Because... Child porn. Doesn't matter if you can prove that this person is most definitely not a child... No. It can still be ruled to be child porn based on arbitrary criteria of appearance alone, and subject to some seriously hefty criminal liability for 'possessing child pornography'...
That it's possible to be convicted of possessing child pornography when you can conclusively prove the age of everyone involved, and over such a minor point as breast size alone... That makes this stuff pretty scary.

(I mean, I have no desire to film porn, but this means I could, in principle film myself naked, and someone could claim the film... Of myself - I'm 30 by the way... Is child porn because my breasts are small... >_<)

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Have you considered that there may be possible implications of this that you hadn't picked up on. You seem to argue 'I don't use porn, porn use isn't a right, stop whining'. However, the thing other people are saying is where is the line drawn? Much of the rhetoric has used phrases like 'obscene material' or 'extreme and objectionable content'. Which sounds like it means terrible things no-one should want to see anyway.

But in Russia, would include anything that told homosexuals they weren't evil deviants. It could arguably mean anything that would be post watershed on telly is restricted. It could easily be expanded to things wholly unconnected to pornography or sex. Amnesty uploads footage of violent human rights abuses. That's very graphic, can't let kids see that can we.

The real worry is that it provides the government with the infrastructure to engage in a more general censorship of the internet.

edit: to clarify, I'm talking about the rhetoric used by politicians and media involved, not this debate

Dont care at all. So now the the threat of no free porn in the UK is equal to anti homo stuff in russia. lol. Sorry, but thats hilarious. Russia will do whatever they want, it has nothing to do with UK censor laws. The funny thing is, this whole banning porn thing hasnt even happened and people are bitching already. Amnesty uploads violence to communicate the issue to others of what is happening and to stop it. So a woman sucking on a cock while taking it up the arse, whats she protesting about? Wow, these comparisons are getting ridiculous. PORN ISNT BANNED. BUY IT. Stop whining about the lack of free online porn and making it out to be a bigger issue than it is.

 

[ninjaRiv]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Except you're forgetting one big part of this; the internet offers everyone the ability to express themselves. Who in the government is deciding what counts as porn? Hardcore butt fucking that you can buy in the local porn shop? Or is it the tastefully artistic nude art that can be found online? Beauty with titties. Because that exists, man. Art and porn can be the same thing and both are forms of self expression. it really has nothing to do with pirating porn AT ALL and pretty much everyone here has said so, I think.

You may not care but I'm sure the people who use the internet to express themselves artistically care.

I guess i missed the point where a woman taking 2 cocks up her arse is considered art. Im sure there are plenty of sad lonely men looking at their PC right now seeing it as useless now porn is gone. You seem to find this a big issue, fine, i find it sad really.

Again you've ignored points already made for the sake of sarcasm.

What about Michelangelo's David? If that were built now, would it count as porn?

Besides the artist side, I think the biggest problem here may be the government censorship. That's... Not a serious issue to you? To have regular, ok porn censored by the government without putting it to public vote? Kinda like they did with books and films.

Michelangelos David wasnt made for people to go "wow, what a huge cock". I dont think you know what art is, think your confusing nudity and porn. Being nude doesnt mean its porn. Anyway, dont care, i really dont care at all about porn. If they banned all porn....dont care. Movies and books have strict codes that state you cant show certain things. As in porn is fine. Violence is fine. Porn with violence is not fine. If you want to see to people fucking, then your fine, your needs are met.

"I don't think you know what art is." Says the guy who forgets that art is entirely subjective. Would you ban Michelangelo's David? Would you really class it as porn? Don't you think it's maybe both? Where would YOU draw the line when it comes to what counts as porn and what counts as art? Where do you think some government employee, under pressure from his bosses, will count as porn?

But again, the artistic side is secondary when compared to the fact that the government is censoring perfectly legal images and videos (and, before you miss it again, I'm not talking about the illegal porn that SHOULD be censored). What happens when they decide some book is a little too thought provoking? A bit too mature?

 

[Whispering Death]

Would any Brits who laughed at the USA being so "backwards" and "conservative" under George Bush like to make that statement now? I present now is the optimal time for Brits to talk about how backwards the USA is. Please render your judgement on us.

 

[ClockworkPenguin]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Have you considered that there may be possible implications of this that you hadn't picked up on. You seem to argue 'I don't use porn, porn use isn't a right, stop whining'. However, the thing other people are saying is where is the line drawn? Much of the rhetoric has used phrases like 'obscene material' or 'extreme and objectionable content'. Which sounds like it means terrible things no-one should want to see anyway.

But in Russia, would include anything that told homosexuals they weren't evil deviants. It could arguably mean anything that would be post watershed on telly is restricted. It could easily be expanded to things wholly unconnected to pornography or sex. Amnesty uploads footage of violent human rights abuses. That's very graphic, can't let kids see that can we.

The real worry is that it provides the government with the infrastructure to engage in a more general censorship of the internet.

edit: to clarify, I'm talking about the rhetoric used by politicians and media involved, not this debate

Dont care at all. So now the the threat of no free porn in the UK is equal to anti homo stuff in russia. lol. Sorry, but thats hilarious. Russia will do whatever they want, it has nothing to do with UK censor laws. The funny thing is, this whole banning porn thing hasnt even happened and people are bitching already. Amnesty uploads violence to communicate the issue to others of what is happening and to stop it. So a woman sucking on a cock while taking it up the arse, whats she protesting about? Wow, these comparisons are getting ridiculous. PORN ISNT BANNED. BUY IT. Stop whining about the lack of free online porn and making it out to be a bigger issue than it is.

That's not what I'm saying. I'm not saying banning porn is LIKE censorship of violence etc. I'm saying they are using banning porn, which is quite hard to argue against, to justify setting up censorship apparatus which could then be expanded to censor other things.

Also, since you have no objection to purchased porn, why do you object to free porn? Do you run a porno business which is struggling in the recession or something? Or is it just a convenient red herring to try and change the tone of the debate and cast aspersions on your opponents?

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Except you're forgetting one big part of this; the internet offers everyone the ability to express themselves. Who in the government is deciding what counts as porn? Hardcore butt fucking that you can buy in the local porn shop? Or is it the tastefully artistic nude art that can be found online? Beauty with titties. Because that exists, man. Art and porn can be the same thing and both are forms of self expression. it really has nothing to do with pirating porn AT ALL and pretty much everyone here has said so, I think.

You may not care but I'm sure the people who use the internet to express themselves artistically care.

I guess i missed the point where a woman taking 2 cocks up her arse is considered art. Im sure there are plenty of sad lonely men looking at their PC right now seeing it as useless now porn is gone. You seem to find this a big issue, fine, i find it sad really.

Again you've ignored points already made for the sake of sarcasm.

What about Michelangelo's David? If that were built now, would it count as porn?

Besides the artist side, I think the biggest problem here may be the government censorship. That's... Not a serious issue to you? To have regular, ok porn censored by the government without putting it to public vote? Kinda like they did with books and films.

Michelangelos David wasnt made for people to go "wow, what a huge cock". I dont think you know what art is, think your confusing nudity and porn. Being nude doesnt mean its porn. Anyway, dont care, i really dont care at all about porn. If they banned all porn....dont care. Movies and books have strict codes that state you cant show certain things. As in porn is fine. Violence is fine. Porn with violence is not fine. If you want to see to people fucking, then your fine, your needs are met.

"I don't think you know what art is." Says the guy who forgets that art is entirely subjective. Would you ban Michelangelo's David? Would you really class it as porn? Don't you think it's maybe both? Where would YOU draw the line when it comes to what counts as porn and what counts as art? Where do you think some government employee, under pressure from his bosses, will count as porn?

But again, the artistic side is secondary when compared to the fact that the government is censoring perfectly legal images and videos (and, before you miss it again, I'm not talking about the illegal porn that SHOULD be censored). What happens when they decide some book is a little too thought provoking? A bit too mature?

Subjective doesnt matter. That statue wasn't built cos the artist liked cock. Porn is made for the sake of porn. Big difference. I agree though, this is about deleting illegal porn, rape and child porn. An i think a few people being pissed is fine if that crap is blocked. Also stopping underage kids looking up that crap. Would you want your 12 year old watching porn? An thats the problem also. You can see anything online. The internet has grown faster than the security behind. If your an adult, nothing is stopping you watching porn online....you may have to pay for it....but nothing is stopping you.

 

[gwilym101]

Cameron decides to ban online porn, but refuses flat out to ban the Sun's page 3 girls because its the customers decision to buy the sun. Government logic at its finest.

 

[ClockworkPenguin]

Would any Brits who laughed at the USA being so "backwards" and "conservative" under George Bush like to make that statement now? I present now is the optimal time for Brits to talk about how backwards the USA is. Please render your judgement on us.

You had the head of a government board of science declare that evolution is a lie from the pit of hell.

Our guys are moralistic authoritarian conservative douchebags, no question. But they're still not at tea party lunacy quite yet.

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

You all stupid? Its not blocked. It blocks rape or child porn. Why do people claim it blocks everything? I hate the condems but this is a good thing. End of the day, if you are a normal porn loving guy, you have nothing to fear.....only if it involves kids or its rape porn. In that case, your not normal and should be beating in prison.

You didn't read it, did you?

The law would immediately ban possession of rape pornography full stop, as well as bringing in new measures to detect and block child pornography. However, it would also automatically block all porn sites to everyone in the UK unless they specifically ask their ISP remove the block,

You didnt read my comment did you. I said it blocks rape porn. Why would anyone want to see rape porn? If you do, i hope some female person in your life is raped so you know its not something for entertainment. Now blocking child porn im all for.

It also block all normal porn sites, unless you specifically ask you ISP to unblock them. Now then, I don't see many sexually frustrated teenagers asking their parents to essentially sign a porn waiver form.

Then they can deal with their frustrations like we all did as teens (me being 36 now). How pathetic is this world getting where no porn is a major issue? Talk about your 1st world problems. Maybe they should wait, get a girlfriend and then have sex with her with out filling their mind with all that fake bullshit porn does. Either that or start handing out razor blades if thats a major issue in their lives.

It's not about the porn, it's about the censorship and what counts as "porn." It's censoring art, even if you don't think it's art.

Art? lol. When people censor, out comes the art excuse. Its hilarious. So is child porn ok if its "art". Or if i raped your mum or sister and labeled "art" that would be ok? You say its not about the porn. IT IS. It says so. Its what this act is all about. An again, normal porn is fine. This is just blocking the sick stuff, that is only posted by criminals and scumbags. Not people releasing porn movies between consenting adults, which is what porn should be.

But hey, atleast, for you, art means snuff movie videos are fine. Animal rape. Violating dead bodies. So what would you say should be blocked on the internet? Because there is a difference between art and violation/crime.

You already know I'm talking about the filter they're putting on regular porn so your sarcastic response is really just kinda silly and pointless.

Nope. I just find the whole online porn filter not a big deal to me. Really, this is all moaning about free porn online. You can still buy it. No one is stopping that. But people want it free....not buying dvds or magazines. This is why people are moaning. I respect your opinion but i find this whole thing hilarious....especially when they use the art argument. Was like when anon were arguing that they should be able to pirate games. lol

Have you considered that there may be possible implications of this that you hadn't picked up on. You seem to argue 'I don't use porn, porn use isn't a right, stop whining'. However, the thing other people are saying is where is the line drawn? Much of the rhetoric has used phrases like 'obscene material' or 'extreme and objectionable content'. Which sounds like it means terrible things no-one should want to see anyway.

But in Russia, would include anything that told homosexuals they weren't evil deviants. It could arguably mean anything that would be post watershed on telly is restricted. It could easily be expanded to things wholly unconnected to pornography or sex. Amnesty uploads footage of violent human rights abuses. That's very graphic, can't let kids see that can we.

The real worry is that it provides the government with the infrastructure to engage in a more general censorship of the internet.

edit: to clarify, I'm talking about the rhetoric used by politicians and media involved, not this debate

Dont care at all. So now the the threat of no free porn in the UK is equal to anti homo stuff in russia. lol. Sorry, but thats hilarious. Russia will do whatever they want, it has nothing to do with UK censor laws. The funny thing is, this whole banning porn thing hasnt even happened and people are bitching already. Amnesty uploads violence to communicate the issue to others of what is happening and to stop it. So a woman sucking on a cock while taking it up the arse, whats she protesting about? Wow, these comparisons are getting ridiculous. PORN ISNT BANNED. BUY IT. Stop whining about the lack of free online porn and making it out to be a bigger issue than it is.

That's not what I'm saying. I'm not saying banning porn is LIKE censorship of violence etc. I'm saying they are using banning porn, which is quite hard to argue against, to justify setting up censorship apparatus which could then be expanded to censor other things.

Also, since you have no objection to purchased porn, why do you object to free porn? Do you run a porno business which is struggling in the recession or something? Or is it just a convenient red herring to try and change the tone of the debate and cast aspersions on your opponents?

I dont purchase porn. I just see this issue as people moaning at free online porn. Just cos there is no porn online, dont mean you cant buy it. End of the day, doesnt matter, no country can ban porn off the internet....the internet is bigger and is a life of its own. Our PM cameron is a fucking retard anyway and he wont make any changes anyway cos its impossible to police the internet as we know with all these pirate sites.

 

[ninjaRiv]

Subjective doesnt matter. That statue wasn't built cos the artist liked cock. Porn is made for the sake of porn. Big difference. I agree though, this is about deleting illegal porn, rape and child porn. An i think a few people being pissed is fine if that crap is blocked. Also stopping underage kids looking up that crap. Would you want your 12 year old watching porn? An thats the problem also. You can see anything online. The internet has grown faster than the security behind. If your an adult, nothing is stopping you watching porn online....you may have to pay for it....but nothing is stopping you.

Not all things with nudity is porn, though, as you know. Suicide Girls? Classic paintings and statues? Nudity in comic books? I can easily see these as being classed as porn.

You have to opt out of this porn censorship, though; a thing plenty of people with families will not do. Wouldn't an opt in option be better? Except that already exists, in the form of software and parental control. This is censorship-lite. !It's censored but not quite. We're just testing everything for when we do ban everything."

 

[karloss01]

So are they going to ban the internet then? because they can't block every website that has a pornographic image. hell Youtube has birthing videos and you know people will turn to that to sate their thirst.

 

[Andrew_C]

Not angry. Just find it funny people moaning so much about the lack of porn. Its hilarious. What the real issue is is "free porn" just go buy it. People are just complaining cos porn is free online. Its nothing to do with art or blocking. Just buy it. But its the pirating excuse....why buy when we get it free. Thats the reason people are moaning. End of the day, if people search for child porn, then we can then catch them when they are flagged up. For the record, i only watch porn with my wife. Watching porn alone is like starving and looking through a restaurants window at all the people eating.

This is a censorship issue not a pornography issue. The government is using this to set up their own Great Firewall of China. How long before searches for info on subjects like Blair Peach, Jean Charles de Menezes, the Birmingham Six, or the Bogside Massacre (Bloody Sunday) get blocked?

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

Subjective doesnt matter. That statue wasn't built cos the artist liked cock. Porn is made for the sake of porn. Big difference. I agree though, this is about deleting illegal porn, rape and child porn. An i think a few people being pissed is fine if that crap is blocked. Also stopping underage kids looking up that crap. Would you want your 12 year old watching porn? An thats the problem also. You can see anything online. The internet has grown faster than the security behind. If your an adult, nothing is stopping you watching porn online....you may have to pay for it....but nothing is stopping you.

Not all things with nudity is porn, though, as you know. Suicide Girls? Classic paintings and statues? Nudity in comic books? I can easily see these as being classed as porn.

You have to opt out of this porn censorship, though; a thing plenty of people with families will not do. Wouldn't an opt in option be better? Except that already exists, in the form of software and parental control. This is censorship-lite. !It's censored but not quite. We're just testing everything for when we do ban everything."

So blocking child porn and rape porn is now compared to the Suicide Girls and classic Statues. HUGE DIFFERENCE PEOPLE. People can get horny about anything, a statue, a movie, a picture or even a plate of food (weird people out there.) Just that porn is made to be porn. Its people paid for fucking to sell a movie of people fucking. Im not against porn at all.....sorry if thats what you think. Though i am against 12 yr olds looking up "arse fucking" online and watching things that will corrupt them. Can we atleast agree with that? Most we need is a solution where adults can watch what they want and kids are blocked from porn online. An every freak is banned from watching child/rape porn online. Censorship is fine, but censor kids, not adults.

 

[Weaver]

I really don't know why they didn't just make the filter opt IN instead of opt OUT.