Universities -- Misconceptions

Recommended Videos

Arbi Trax

New member
Jul 13, 2011
130
0
0
I would have paid double for the privelige of going to my uni. Ancient buildings, containing hundreds of years' accumulated knowledge. I would sometimes head into other departments' libraries, borrow a book or journal and leaf through it while sitting on an ancient leather armchair in one of the rec rooms.

If ever I won the lottery I would go back to my uni, and spend the rest of my life absorbing the words on those dusty shelves.

Centuries of knowledge, the entire intellectual history of mankind, all there for the taking! Aude sapere! Take the plunge! So what if it's not practical, or it doesn't automatically boost your chances of getting a job?

The day that all human endeavour becomes purely utilitarian is the day that we cease moving forward as a species.
 

Chemical Alia

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1,657
0
0
Lilani said:
Stall said:
You should try taking a few art classes. Yes, it is very much a business, and there are too many instructors there who are much more interested in their own work than teaching, but art classes tend to be a bit different. I'm taking three this semester, and I love how free-range it all is. My painting class is in its own building downtown, and it's open 24 hours a day. You can come in and work whenever you want, as long as no classes are going on in the room you've gone into. Sure, if nobody is there they lock the doors to the classrooms, but as long as you are there the instructors just lock the door and tell you to shut it on the way out. I've even heard of people sleeping overnight down there. It's full of comfy chairs and couches. And my other two classes aren't too different.

But of course it is a business. They've still got bills to pay and services to provide. Just about EVERYTHING is a business these days--even public schools. In the end, the university experience is what you make of it. It can be as rewarding or as disheartening as you allow it to be. These days you aren't always going to be handed everything you need to get to the career you want just by taking all the classes required for your degree. You're going to have to take on your own projects outside of class and get the classes you're taking to work for you.

And the one thing I guarantee your university provides is the tools to do this. I am CERTAIN there are places at your university to do extra work. Computer labs, the library, what have you. Even unoccupied classrooms. For example: I'm a computer animation major, and the only program we're learning in class is Lightwave--which just about NO commercial studio uses. However, the computers in the animation lab also have 3D Studio Max and Maya, two of the industry standard programs. So I'm teaching myself how to use those on the side--learning Lightwave is helping to facilitate that, and vice versa.

What's even better is Autodesk offers ALL of their programs free to students for three years. That's 3D Studio Max, Maya, AutoCAD, and any of their other dozens of programs, in their newest and fullest forms. So, I can also work on these projects on my own computer.

So it's your choice. Either submit to the bureaucracy and do what they tell you to do, or take control and make the system work for you. Or better yet, would you like to improve the system? Get involved. Open up a dialog with your university. When you graduate, join the alumni program. Or get a degree in educational affairs and dedicate your life to working for school systems, and put yourself in a position to change it yourself. Regardless of the path you take, there's always something you can do.
Completely agreed. You get out of college precisely what you put in. Of course schools often lower standards to keep students enrolled, and no degree guarantees you a job. But schools provide you with resources and the potential to grow through your peers and those with experience.

Acting cynical and writing off what education offers is one thing you can do with your time, but you could also be making the best of what you have, in the hopes of giving some of that experience back someday.
 

Stall

New member
Apr 16, 2011
950
0
0
Chemical Alia said:
Acting cynical and writing off what education offers is one thing you can do with your time, but you could also be making the best of what you have, in the hopes of giving some of that experience back someday.
I did not mean to sound as if I am "writing off" the value of an education, nor did I intend to sound cynical. I'm a senior graduating in the spring summa cum laude with departmental honors, and I am also applying to graduate programs. I also have aspirations to be a lecturer or professor as well. So obviously I don't hate education, do not feel it has no value, and am not cynical about it in any way really. I was tempted to state that the fact that a university is a business carries both positive and negative connotations, so I suppose that is my fault for not communicating facets of my thoughts well enough.

I wanted to attack this super idealized, very romantic vision people have of higher education. It strikes me as incredibly obnoxious when people have this very "Hollywood" and romanticized vision of higher education. Being a business isn't a bad thing, but it seems there is a rather significant proportion of people out there who think universities are "more" than a business and somehow an insult to imply that they are nothing beyond this.

It wasn't an attack against "the system," per se, but an attack against individuals who elevate this system to something it is not.

Hoplon said:
I believe the best quote about US Universities was in the vein of "Over priced daycare"
[img=And you were saying?]http://i53.tinypic.com/2h87iol.gif[/img]
 

Chemical Alia

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1,657
0
0
Stall said:
Chemical Alia said:
Acting cynical and writing off what education offers is one thing you can do with your time, but you could also be making the best of what you have, in the hopes of giving some of that experience back someday.
I did not mean to sound as if I am "writing off" the value of an education, nor did I intend to sound cynical. I'm a senior graduating in the spring summa cum laude with departmental honors, and I am also applying to graduate programs. I also have aspirations to be a lecturer or professor as well. So obviously I don't hate education, do not feel it has no value, and am not cynical about it in any way really. I was tempted to state that the fact that a university is a business carries both positive and negative connotations, so I suppose that is my fault for not communicating facets of my thoughts well enough.

I wanted to attack this super idealized, very romantic vision people have of higher education. It strikes me as incredibly obnoxious when people have this very "Hollywood" and romanticized vision of higher education. Being a business isn't a bad thing, but it seems there is a rather significant proportion of people out there who think universities are "more" than a business and somehow an insult to imply that they are nothing beyond this.

It wasn't an attack against "the system," per se, but an attack against individuals who elevate this system to something it is not.
Oh, I see. I guess I just never see much of what it is you're complaining about, but usually the opposite. I was surrounded by people who complained about the lack of quality of their education (I went to a state school, so it wasn't too great) all through college, and who produced pretty mediocre work.

It's definitely a potentially dangerous and costly mindset to go through college without any consideration toward what you plan to do with your degree, and that's something I don't think schools address very well at all.

I have too many friends who graduated years ago and still have no idea what they want to do. Even my sister got a bachelor's degree in Japanese years ago because she was a weeaboo when she started college and thought it would be cool, and struggles to find even retail work now, while barely managing to pay the interest on her student loans :C

Overall though, I think it's the for-profit schools like the Art Institutes and DeVry that really need to go, the ones that advertise heavily and make a lot of promises while their career placement is abysmal along with the quality of their curricula.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,680
0
0
Chemical Alia said:
Overall though, I think it's the for-profit schools like the Art Institutes and DeVry that really need to go, the ones that advertise heavily and make a lot of promises while their career placement is abysmal along with the quality of their curricula.
Are you trying to wage war on climate control? There's a demand for certified HVAC specialists. Call now to see if you qualify for financial aid!

And plenty of state schools are well respected, and even more still have specific programs that are well respected.
 

Chemical Alia

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1,657
0
0
Dags90 said:
Chemical Alia said:
Overall though, I think it's the for-profit schools like the Art Institutes and DeVry that really need to go, the ones that advertise heavily and make a lot of promises while their career placement is abysmal along with the quality of their curricula.
Are you trying to wage war on climate control? There's a demand for certified HVAC specialists. Call now to see if you qualify for financial aid!

And plenty of state schools are well respected, and even more still have specific programs that are well respected.
Lol, yeah. But yeah, I went to Kutztown University, which at least was known for having the best art department among PA state schools. It was just a shame that it was lacking a lot of courses that I was very interested in and could have helped me. My sister went to Penn State, supposedly a pretty great school if you're not majoring in Japanese or turf grass.
 

GrizzlerBorno

New member
Sep 2, 2010
2,295
0
0
Well I'm still a freshman.... so I'm not quite jaded enough with College Bureaucracy to agree. Maybe later?
 

Stall

New member
Apr 16, 2011
950
0
0
Grospoliner said:
Build me a space shuttle without proper engineering education. Can you do that for me? Didn't think so. Bai~
You know, two posts above your own-- about two hours prior to your own-- I explicitly stated that this thread was not an attack against higher education nor 'the system,' but an attack on a subset of individuals obsessed with an over-idealized image of universities. My original post said nothing about the quality nor need of education either: again, it was all an attack on the way some people romanticize the university system. Any statement you read believing that I "hate education" in my original post was thoroughly (and improperly) extrapolated.

So, I guess that 'proper education' you were reading doesn't cover reading, eh? I could slip in a quick quip against engineers, but I'm better than that :p
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
GrizzlerBorno said:
Well I'm still a freshman.... so I'm not quite jaded enough with College Bureaucracy to agree. Maybe later?
He is butthurt either b/c he doesn't understand the difference between the actual universities and the for-profit ones, failed out, or is just royally pissed. Either way, if he had an inkling of an idea he'd understand that he's taking a shred of truth and blowing it out of proportion and into the realm of vague generalities.

My take? He is only partially correct and depending on where you are things will vary. Hell, they even vary within the universities themselves.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Stall said:
Dags90 said:
I'm pretty sure state universities in the U.S. are non-profits. Sure, they might want to increase revenues, so they can expand programs with the hope of further increasing revenues, but they're certainly not making a profit. A fair number of private universities in the U.S. are also non-profit.
Nonprofit just means they only use profits internally to pay for their operating costs and such, and not distribute it to shareholders or owners. Nonprofits still need profits and revenue to cover costs and such; nor does nonprofit mean that they aren't a business anymore. If a nonprofit doesn't make enough money, then it can go under just like any other business.

Simply put: nonprofit != we don't need profit
Um... I'm guessing you've never taken a University course on economics?

Profit is the revenue you don't spend. If you're avoiding a profit, you just reduce your income/increase your service until you spend everying. Hence, nonprofit = NONPROFIT.

And anyways, I don't really care. I want to pursue a career in advanced computer algorithm design/databases/graphic design/something (I'm only a sophomore, this is the year I figure it out), and I NEED a degree to do it. The fact that my university happens to do tons of research, fits the "supercool" University stereotype pretty well (as far as I can tell/care), and is dirt cheap is all a nice bonus.
 

Grospoliner

New member
Feb 16, 2010
474
0
0
Stall said:
Grospoliner said:
Build me a space shuttle without proper engineering education. Can you do that for me? Didn't think so. Bai~
You know, two posts above your own-- about two hours prior to your own-- I explicitly stated that this thread was not an attack against higher education nor 'the system,' but an attack on a subset of individuals obsessed with an over-idealized image of universities. My original post said nothing about the quality nor need of education either: again, it was all an attack on the way some people romanticize the university system. Any statement you read believing that I "hate education" in my original post was thoroughly (and improperly) extrapolated.

So, I guess that 'proper education' you were reading doesn't cover reading, eh? I could slip in a quick quip against engineers, but I'm better than that :p
Implying I read through two pages worth of comments? I certainly did not.
 

dantoddd

New member
Sep 18, 2009
272
0
0
syrus27 said:
Stall said:
I need to rant.

Do you want to know what universities are? BUSINESSES.
Did the ever pretend to be anything else?
most universities are non-profit organizations.

I've been to three universities Amherst, Cornell & UC Berkeley none of those felt like a business to me. as an undergrad i was very well taken care of I got generous financial aid, got to study abroad & profs were nice to talk to an always helped. Grad school was a bit more job like but that is something you should expect when you to grad school.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Grospoliner said:
Stall said:
Grospoliner said:
Build me a space shuttle without proper engineering education. Can you do that for me? Didn't think so. Bai~
You know, two posts above your own-- about two hours prior to your own-- I explicitly stated that this thread was not an attack against higher education nor 'the system,' but an attack on a subset of individuals obsessed with an over-idealized image of universities. My original post said nothing about the quality nor need of education either: again, it was all an attack on the way some people romanticize the university system. Any statement you read believing that I "hate education" in my original post was thoroughly (and improperly) extrapolated.

So, I guess that 'proper education' you were reading doesn't cover reading, eh? I could slip in a quick quip against engineers, but I'm better than that :p
Implying I read through two pages worth of comments? I certainly did not.
One page*

And no, the OP was pretty clear that he wasn't ranting about the education itself at all.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Stall said:
I need to rant.

Do you want to know what universities are? BUSINESSES. They aren't these wonderful places of learning where free ideas propagate and bloom, or these places of immense intellectual growth where blah blah blah. This kind of garbage belongs in the movies... it is not reality. Reality would tell you that a universities are enterprises: they operate with the sole purpose of earning profits. It just so happens that their manner of earning these profits is to make you pay for your education. You give them money... they give you a piece of paper that increases your ability to get a job. Professors are their employees-- they aren't a glorious beacon of knowledge and freedom of thought, but just people doing their jobs. You are the university's client, which is referred to as a student in the industry of higher education. Stop giving universities special treatment: treat them like you would any other corporation or place of business... because THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE.

Can we please just drop this overly romanticized crap about higher education? I'm sick of these people saying thinking universities somehow special or are these magical supercool places. They're business... nothing more... nothing less. They aren't anything like the movies told you they were. You need a reality check if you think so otherwise.

Oh, this applies to American universities. If you aren't American and don't go to an American university, then please, don't tell me how "I'm wrong". I'm speaking only on what I know (which is American universities), and could care less how this generalizes to other cultures. I don't mean to sound like a jerk with this statement, but I want to avoid the inevitable "Oh, well I go to a university in X country, and this isn't true here!".
The movie "accepted" was a much funnier way of saying exactly this. Everyone should watch it.
unabomberman said:
GrizzlerBorno said:
Well I'm still a freshman.... so I'm not quite jaded enough with College Bureaucracy to agree. Maybe later?
He is butthurt either b/c he doesn't understand the difference between the actual universities and the for-profit ones, failed out, or is just royally pissed. Either way, if he had an inkling of an idea he'd understand that he's taking a shred of truth and blowing it out of proportion and into the realm of vague generalities.

My take? He is only partially correct and depending on where you are things will vary. Hell, they even vary within the universities themselves.
Universities are run for profit, plain and simple. It's an obvious truth. That doesn't make them bad. There is no reason for them not to be. Yes, it leads to some bad decisions on the part of the universities, but they still accomplish their goals, at least to some extent. Really, he's right, american universities are not places of free thought and expression. think about the firefly poster thing that has been discussed on this very site.
 

Berenzen

New member
Jul 9, 2011
905
0
0
I'm guessing that your talking about universities and colleges in the U.S. In Canada, tuition is fairly affordable (the University of Alberta, where I go to, is maybe 7 grand a year if you take 10 classes). Yes, universities are businesses. However, they thrive on the business of selling and obtaining knowledge. As such, they allow people to express and share ideas without any major repercussions. Yes, in a 400 person class, you won't be getting much discussion, but there are many classes, particularly in upper years (300+ level classes typically) that focus on discussion, as there are maybe 30-50 students in the class. And if you go into graduate school, then it's especially focused on discussion and freedom of thought.

Essentially it goes like this
1st year-> mostly pure learning, huge classes. Maybe a couple smaller classes where discussion occurs and thrives

2nd year-> more learning, but classes are maybe 1/4th the size of the 1st year classes, discussions encouraged further

3rd and 4th years-> some learning classes most of which are very small, many of which promote discussion of the topic at hand.

Graduate school-> You are working for a professor, doing many experiments under him or her to publish papers. Free thought and challenging your supervisor with your own ideas is not only permitted, but encouraged as it allows you to grow, and challenge papers that you may see as wrong or convoluted, that you may wish to disprove if it is in your own line of study.

After Grad school, you may be hired back as a professor, where you will use these skills of discussion and challenging the status quo in order to become successful, allowing you to obtain more grants, therefore more graduate students, which give the university more money.

In essence, universities want you to be able discuss and challenge ideas in their environment, simply because it allows them to gain money in research grants, scholarships and more. Yes they are businesses, and they want to make money. But the product they sell is information, and without discussion that they should promote, then their product becomes less valuable and hence, they make less money.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,041
0
0
Stall said:
Everybody with a little common sense knows this, even if they don't before they go, they will know after they start going to one.

This is why if I had great pull and could change things about colleges and universities, I would go in and start slashing the curriculum of each one, because I've been to two, and both have way too many requirements in their "core" curriculums(most of the core classes are just rehashes of things learned in high school and sometimes earlier in life).

It takes up way too much of each students valuable time. I wouldn't take out the whole core, just cut in half, just remove the double and sometimes requirements from each main subject section, as well as remove the Physical Education plus Health class requirement.

Also remove foreign language requirements from degrees that that wouldn't actually benefit from it, or at least create an equivalent degree that doesn't require it(for the people that know it will be a waste of time and money for them). I and I know at least ten other people that went to the university I went to that didn't go for the a creative writing degree like they wanted, because of the moronic foreign language requirement. We knew we didn't need it as writers and that it would waste 4 class hours worth of space, and cost us an extra 2000 dollars at least, probably more if books were included in that calculation.

Alorxico said:
If universities were truly businesses and nothing more, as you claim, they would not have a list of requirements that must be met by the "buyer" to use their "product".
Actually it is absolutely a business. I know many professors that didn't hide it, they admitted to their students that the universities do certain things to make more money.

Think about it:

1.)They of course accept people that can easily pay.

2.)They have requirements on getting in, because, the better the student the longer they might stay and give out more money. Why not let loads of bad students in? Even though it would bring in a little money, chances are those types of students wouldn't stay long, and each student while paying money also takes up resources from the university, if the student doesn't stay long enough, the money paid by the student might not end up being more than the resources that that student used up.

3.)Once the student enrolled, there is the core curriculum. It is full of classes that university has deemed as "important for succeeding in the real world" That they are just classes of basic knowledge that everybody needs to know. The problem is that it turns out that, oh, you don't need just one basic class in that area, you need two, or maybe three. " 'Employers' last year told us that you really need to know this basic skill, so we are increasing the requirement in that area."
My second university actually upped the core requirement in one area when I got there, luckily I had taking an extra class in that area, for the heck of it, before I transferred.

Number three is a red flag that shows that colleges and universities are just businesses. Many many many years ago, universities actually were what they were suppose to be. Their weren't any silly core requirements. Universities were places where people went to narrow their learning. If I had lived way way way back when, I, a person that was interested in literature and becoming a writer, would go to a university get a degree in writing and or literature, and I would only take classes that pertained to my field.
But I didn't go to school way way way back when, I went in this day and age, where only a little over half of my classes had to do with writing and literature. The other 45% had to do with fields I wasn't interested in, at least not from a wanting to be an expert standpoint. A few decades ago, I don't know exactly when, someone came of with the stupid idea that we want people that are "well-rounded" instead of people separated into super expertise categories. We can't have an expert writer that doesn't know how to do complex math or have intimate knowledge of all the sciences. We can't have people not knowing things from other fields, blah blah blah blah blah.
Since there started to be more and more universities, they had to start competing for students and making more money to keep up with the others. They picked up this well-round student idea or "disciplined as one of my crazy professors put it" because they saw that it meant to be well rounded students have to take classes in every one of the main class types, so they made them requirements. Then many years later, when they saw that they needed more money to keep up, they instituted more basic requirements. Required "core" classes means that all students have to take them and that means more money because students can't refuse to take them even if they are stupid requirements, because they can't graduate without them.

Universities these days aren't creating as many full experts these days. Only the truly gifted can come through it as whole experts. The normal people come out messed up and broken because almost half the time they were at a university, their heads were being filled with useless knowledge that they won't use.
Example: I'm a writer, what use was it for me to take two lab sciences, where most of the stuff being taught was also taught to me in grade school. What use do I have for taking higher level math classes, trigonometry isn't going to help me become a better writer, neither is physical education, health, history, other social sciences, and foreign languages. I have done quite a bit of writing over the years, not one bit from any of those classes has helped me be a better writer. They haven't helped me become a better anything, they just filled my head with useless trivia I will never use, will unless I become a contestant on Jeopardy!:

Me: "Thank you Alex, I'll take useless knowledge for 400"

PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW

Alex: "Look at that, it's the daily double."
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,041
0
0
Grospoliner said:
Stall said:
Build me a space shuttle without proper engineering education. Can you do that for me? Didn't think so. Bai~
Would you want an engineer that only half of his education was spent on engineering, to build the vehicle you are going to be in, or one where 90% to every bit of his education was in engineering?

The first one is what we are churning out these days. Instead of totally narrowing eduction in the highest level to make people that are total experts, in the name of creating "well-rounded" people, we are making graduates that have spent half the time working on things in their field compared to people several decades ago.

Instead getting the time to learn something that in the future the engineering student will need to know to fix a fatal error, that student was sitting in some history or social science class, or running in a physical education class, or in a lab science that wouldn't help with the type of engineering being learned by the student.

Even if the OP wasn't thinking of it, that is what the OP was meaning behind the universities being businesses. In the name of making more money, they are requiring more and more classes that have nothing to do with people's majors, which takes up valuable class time that could be used on classes that will further a student's knowledge in the field he or she wants to go into.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Stall said:
I need to rant.

Do you want to know what universities are? BUSINESSES. They aren't these wonderful places of learning where free ideas propagate and bloom, or these places of immense intellectual growth where blah blah blah. This kind of garbage belongs in the movies... it is not reality. Reality would tell you that a universities are enterprises: they operate with the sole purpose of earning profits. It just so happens that their manner of earning these profits is to make you pay for your education. You give them money... they give you a piece of paper that increases your ability to get a job. Professors are their employees-- they aren't a glorious beacon of knowledge and freedom of thought, but just people doing their jobs. You are the university's client, which is referred to as a student in the industry of higher education. Stop giving universities special treatment: treat them like you would any other corporation or place of business... because THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE.

Can we please just drop this overly romanticized crap about higher education? I'm sick of these people saying thinking universities somehow special or are these magical supercool places. They're business... nothing more... nothing less. They aren't anything like the movies told you they were. You need a reality check if you think so otherwise.

Oh, this applies to American universities. If you aren't American and don't go to an American university, then please, don't tell me how "I'm wrong". I'm speaking only on what I know (which is American universities), and could care less how this generalizes to other cultures. I don't mean to sound like a jerk with this statement, but I want to avoid the inevitable "Oh, well I go to a university in X country, and this isn't true here!".
The movie "accepted" was a much funnier way of saying exactly this. Everyone should watch it.
unabomberman said:
GrizzlerBorno said:
Well I'm still a freshman.... so I'm not quite jaded enough with College Bureaucracy to agree. Maybe later?
He is butthurt either b/c he doesn't understand the difference between the actual universities and the for-profit ones, failed out, or is just royally pissed. Either way, if he had an inkling of an idea he'd understand that he's taking a shred of truth and blowing it out of proportion and into the realm of vague generalities.

My take? He is only partially correct and depending on where you are things will vary. Hell, they even vary within the universities themselves.
Universities are run for profit, plain and simple. It's an obvious truth. That doesn't make them bad. There is no reason for them not to be. Yes, it leads to some bad decisions on the part of the universities, but they still accomplish their goals, at least to some extent. Really, he's right, american universities are not places of free thought and expression. think about the firefly poster thing that has been discussed on this very site.
No. You are taking an incident and extending it into the realm of uninformed generalization.

Yes, the American model of higher education is based on profit, that much is well known, but within the model you can find all sorts of different incarnations of what a University is supposed to be and not just the assembly line equivalent of education.

To say universities are run for profit is a misconception given how they are at the cutting edge of technological and philosophical development, failed economic model nothwithstanding. That's where scientific and technological breakthroughs are carried out in the U.S., along with certain strands of the private sector, and the people there are thrilled to bothe learn and develop those things. To say otherwise is to plain be stubborn and close minded.