There must not be much of worth to report on if this manchild's tantrum is newsworthy.
He's even gone and removed himself from the equation.
He's even gone and removed himself from the equation.
Plus, some of the others say he had some kind of depression going on.Irridium said:Indeed. Especially in Fish's case, who gets abuse more or less constantly. Doesn't matter who you are, deal with that for a year or two straight and it wears you down. At this point his patience for insults is pretty much gone, so yeah. Totally understandable to see him react this way.Senare said:I think that the way Fish acted is very human and that is not something I would hold against him. If this was someone else, would you really hold it against that person to steam up and lash out if they were attacked? How much of a moral high ground should we really expect others to take?
I just went back to check the articles on Blow on the Escapist... and all I saw were him stating dissatisfaction with the the general direction mainstream gaming is going, criticism of console corporate culture, some mildly controversial stuff about pricing on different platforms, more criticism on the evils of social gaming, one controversial comment about story-based games being shit... honestly, I don't find him saying much stupid shit. Hell, one article snarkily remarks at Blow's dismissal of the entirety of gaming, even the quotes themselves were from a misguided interviewer, not Blow himself.scotth266 said:Because he made those stupid stars in Braid, ruining a perfectly good game.Raiyan 1.0 said:Why do people hate Jonathan Blow again?
Being serious though, he says a fair amount of stuff, some of it stupid, some of it not. I tend to think the stuff he says is more on the stupid side, and a fair number of people agree. Phil Fish is another shining example of this, though he's a LOT more toxic than Blow's ever been, and consequently gets a lot more flack for it. Telling people to "choke on my cock" when you get criticized tends to make you a big fat target.
Thing is, normal people have to deal with the consequences of their words and actions, without the shield of "PR blandspeak" to protect them. We really do. It's why we try not to be terrible to other people, we'll usually get flack for it, at the very least.Deathfish15 said:One that was not afraid to actually be a NORMAL PERSON instead of some nebulous, unseen developer who only shows his face to say something factual about whatever they're working on, hype it up a little, then disappear back to the office.
I believe it was how he was presented in IG:TM. How he was upset people didn't "get" the message in Braid.Raiyan 1.0 said:I just went back to check the articles on Blow on the Escapist... and all I saw were him stating dissatisfaction with the the general direction mainstream gaming is going, criticism of console corporate culture, some mildly controversial stuff about pricing on different platforms, more criticism on the evils of social gaming, one controversial comment about story-based games being shit... honestly, I don't find him saying much stupid shit. Hell, one article snarkily remarks at Blow's dismissal of the entirety of gaming, even the quotes themselves were from a misguided interviewer, not Blow himself.scotth266 said:Because he made those stupid stars in Braid, ruining a perfectly good game.Raiyan 1.0 said:Why do people hate Jonathan Blow again?
Being serious though, he says a fair amount of stuff, some of it stupid, some of it not. I tend to think the stuff he says is more on the stupid side, and a fair number of people agree. Phil Fish is another shining example of this, though he's a LOT more toxic than Blow's ever been, and consequently gets a lot more flack for it. Telling people to "choke on my cock" when you get criticized tends to make you a big fat target.
I have heard a few of his technical panels on game development, and he gives intelligent advice.
Even if that be the case, it doesn't change the fact that Mr. Beer is a douche bag. The lowest, scum-sucking tosser of the gaming journalist breed.RaikuFA said:But both of them do only come out from the woodwork when they want attention. Beer was calling them out for just that.
I can't see even Phil Fish saying that and actually meaning it.shrekfan246 said:It's not so much a lack of humor as the reference being just obscure enough that people who aren't avid followers of the show wouldn't get it; I should know, I missed it myself.
And given the way the guy has reacted to other subjects in the past, it's not beyond reasonable to assume he meant something like that seriously.
Oh definetly hes also an ass, it just seems like people keep going "Beers the worst, he's picking on a developer who's done nothing wrong." It's like the bully beating up the guy who won't stop talking down to everyone and thinking he's better than everyone. Yeah you still hate the bully, but that kid really needed his ass kicked.Vigormortis said:Even if that be the case, it doesn't change the fact that Mr. Beer is a douche bag. The lowest, scum-sucking tosser of the gaming journalist breed.RaikuFA said:But both of them do only come out from the woodwork when they want attention. Beer was calling them out for just that.
Besides, there're different ways to "call someone out" on something.
There's the well-tempered, mature, level-headed, and sharp-minded way. Then there's the ill-tempered, immature, confrontational, and dim-witted way.
A decent journalist; one who isn't a twat; would use the former method. Mr. Beer seems to relish in using the latter.
So like I said in my previous post: Marcus Beer can fuck right off.
Besides, I find this communities knee-jerk response to the whole affair far more depressing and aggravating than the clearly biased article or the affair itself.
I can't see even Phil Fish saying that and actually meaning it.shrekfan246 said:It's not so much a lack of humor as the reference being just obscure enough that people who aren't avid followers of the show wouldn't get it; I should know, I missed it myself.
And given the way the guy has reacted to other subjects in the past, it's not beyond reasonable to assume he meant something like that seriously.
And yes, the quote is obscure enough to fly over most heads. That much has been made clear with the overreaction of much of the community to this whole debacle.
However, I think most of us have been too quick to side with Marcus Beer simply because of our already-present dislike of Phil Fish.
Like I said to the poster above, Mr. Beers comments were as childish and confrontational as Mr. Fishs; if not more so.
In fact, even though I've very little (if any) respect for Phil Fish, I actually find myself siding with him on this one. His response was a bit too torrid, admittedly, but I honestly think Mr. Beer deserved it.
I mean, we're quick to lambast game designers and industry people for rude comments and actions, especially when the critics point them out to us. Yet, we rarely if ever hold the critics responsible for their own comments or actions.
Unless, of course, that critic is making fun of something we like. Then it's 'war'.
It's totally fine. It's an interesting discussion pretty much, and I'm glad it was just a discussion and not a full blown argument. With regards to it helping you during your dark moments, that's really fair enough. I've had a few moments, and usually the fear of the unknown has been enough to make me chicken out. It's now a case where I see being alive akin to purgatory, but I'll live. Would I seek help? Eh, no. I see the pessimism and cynicism as helpful in an academic field that is pretty much all about criticising society and humanity. Not to mention, as weird as it sounds, I get the feeling I'd lose my true self by being told there is a correct way to be and a wrong way to be. There's also the fact it'd end up on a medical record and hurt job prospects. There's a few other reasons but it gets more tedious, such as the paranoia of the difference between depression and the normal human experience.Andy of Comix Inc said:Well I meant to say it is easy to spot it and manage it... it is less easy to act on those managements. I mean I've been seeing psychologists nonstop for the past 5 years, taking the same anti-depressant medication... it is a long, arduous process. But the first step is noticing and getting yourself in - and that bit is only as hard as you believe it to be. That's what I meant to say.
I want to say, I'm really sorry I've dragged this out. I'm not so much upset or offended by your views... I'm more fascinated. I guess I've taught myself to think this way because it's what's kept my neck out of a noose; I believe that suicide is a selfish act because that helps me to not do it. It's what my parents told me. I really can't leave them alone if I can help it, y'know?
As for Phil Fish though... you say that nothing of value would be lost if he killed himself. This is where I kind of assumed you lacked empathy - there's a strain in there of "I don't mind if he kills himself, because I don't care about him." And my response, well, he's human - someone, somewhere cares about him. His life gives value to someone. Hell, he's a creative - I know I loved FEZ along with quite a few other people... is that not a value?
It's the idea that "nothing of value is lost [to me]" that kind of made me consider you might be a bit on the nihilistic side, lacking a bit of compassion, or the ability to put value on people's lives beyond what they can offer (or have offered) to you. That's why I leapt at you; you've proven this is merely a difference of opinion, though, not something more insidious as I had incorrectly assumed.
That or a "you have this much common sense to register account with us" thing (it's funny cause most celebrities who use twitter don't seem to have that much).JoshuaMadoc said:Might as well annihilate Twitter outright.WanderingFool said:I think there needs to be a corprate bi-law or something, that prevents employees from having Twitter accounts. Cause nothing good ever seems to come from it.