Ultratwinkie said:
hazabaza1 said:
Ishal said:
Azaraxzealot said:
So... because he's honest, open, and speaks his mind that makes him a giant prick?
Yes, because... shocking as this may sound, you can speak your mind and articulate points w/o being a jerk.
I'm going to miss Phil, he may not have made a game I actually WANTED to play, but he was EXACTLY the kind of developer this industry needs to instill a positive change in this festering stagnation. One that was not afraid to actually be a NORMAL PERSON
"Normal Person" with a serious case of thin skin for someone making games. We must know an entirely different set of "normal" people, cuz the ones I know can function w/o being assholes all the time and possess some modicum of self awareness. Like, say, being inflammatory with remarks on twitter is a magnet for the kind of abuse that Fish claims to hate getting.
The AAA games industry may be stale and might need shaking up, and Fish has points about not being beholden to publishers for certain things and being allowed freedom. Valid points, I might add. But the indie games scene has an image too, and Fish is exactly the picture of what a lot of people think. Some unstable, pompous asshat, who goes off the handle when someone calls him or his art mean names. People like Marcus get paid to do what they do, doesn't matter if its right, its reality. Reality should be known and understood. Fish said he still liked twitter, but if the bad started to outweigh the good, he should have dropped it and left, especially if it was affecting hims so negatively.
I guess the industry is just not ready to accept that people with a bit of fame and credibility are actually people too who have differing opinions, emotions, and lives outside of their career.
Who cares about the lives outside their career? I hope they are happy and fulfilled, enjoying life, but as a consumer I want to know how the game I'm excited for is going along. This isn't E! You think most gamers care about that crap?
Developers aren't going back into their offices, the smart ones aren't anyway. They should be saying.. "hmm when people are assholes on twitter, bad things happen. Maybe I should be more on point when I talk to fans and
watch what I say."
I stand 100% by everything I said. Just because someone has a level of fame does not automatically mean they should not be allowed to be who they are. At that point you are turning what was once a person into a caricature, and not only that, but the caricature you WANT them to be, and judging from the comments here, everyone has fallen into the groupthink fallacy and are being run by mob mentality. Even I am getting flak just for saying something different than most people here are.
And you're right, this ISN'T E!, so people should stop acting like it is and stop holding on to all the little things he said to upset people and casting him as a caricature instead of a person. No one seemed to report on any of the good things Phil Fish did, or all the shit he stirred up that SHOULD be stirred up (like the obvious race discrepancy in our games we all just willfully ignore), people just cling to the same three stories about him that pissed people off and refuse to let go of them. And the only reason they ARE big stories is because of media leeches just as Phil Fish described. Would be all be so hard on him if NO ONE reported on the inflammatory things he said? Of course not, the media only chose to report on the bad and not the good (just like FOX news and all the other evil news stations).
I don't want a games industry run by PR-friendly tosspots who only speak PR-inese. I want an industry run by accessible, REAL people who say REAL things on their minds and have REAL lives outside of their games. Why would anyone want our games industry to be some kind of PR-friendly machine that only drip-feeds information and hype to us? That's exactly what is causing problems like Aliens: Colonial Marines and the perpetual silence that Valve has. To be clear, this isn't SPECIFICALLY about Phil Fish, this is about how we as fans/consumers treat people like him. We make the industry afraid to communicate and be transparent with us because if the loud assholes who seem to be our entire population are the SLIGHTEST bit unhappy, then here comes the hate and abuse train. And Phil Fish was completely right in his feeling of helplessness and aimless rage when it comes to the fact that we can say and do whatever the fuck we want to him and other members of the industry, but if they dare lift a FINGER against us then we're justified in piling on MORE abuse? These people walk on eggshells every day because of the 99% of commenters like in this comments thread all over the internet, and we all wonder why new information and transparency is so hard to get from these people. The amount of flak to what Phil Fish says is completely disproportional and mostly uncalled for. I'm sure more than a few of us have told HIM to kill himself or said his game sucks or said Western games suck, yet I don't see anyone bringing out the pitchforks for every single person who says those things.
It's hypocritical to think that just because he has a level of fame and notoriety that he automatically has to act in a specific manner that we arbitrarily decided. Just because he gained a bigger soapbox than most people does not automatically mean he has to stop being who he is or receive MORE abuse for who he is. That's just wrong, and it demonstrated a level of entitlement that, frankly, we just shouldn't have.
And this is a reply for ALL who retorted to me.
Dogstile said:
immovablemover said:
I like how the original post fails to quote anything said by Mr beer, and laughably describes what he says as "Criticism"
"Have you seen these wankers ***** and moan?Phil Fish in particular," Beer said. When a panelist offered that Fish seemed "whiny," Beer interrupted, "Whiny? He's a fucking asshole most of the time."
A tiny exerpt of a 3 minute rant in which there is basically only insults thrown.
And i'd just like to remind everyone that, had this happened on this site, Fish would have never got a chance to tell Beer to kill himself; Because Beer would have been banned by a Mod for insulting other members.
Oh but no, Escapist, keep representing Beer as some innocent "Member of the media" who was only "Criticising".
This. Seriously, i've read most of the comments on here and most range from just "he's a prick" to "if you can't handle it, don't use twitter".
Or how about you don't be an abusive asshole to someone just because you don't like them. Get some class.
Yes, I agree with this as well. The media is only reporting on one side of the issue, the side that paints the media in the role of the victim, and it's just bad and unethical journalism.