Everyone picks on me because I have an opinion. If you don't respect my opinion, then why bother quoting my posts?
nowadays almost every kid is hiding a disability. I've hid mine since I was 9.qeinar said:which means your opinion is biased. : p also how is people beating games without cheats bad for their company? also just banning random people would not serve the company anything.. xD autism does not hinder your ability to cheat and lie in any way. would you stick up for a 11 year old without an disability that got banned after moding his achievements? kinda doubt that..BlueGlowstick said:I think that's wrong to stick cheater by their name. I don't think he cheated. Autistic children/adults are unbelievably smart & talented. Sure they have difficulty talking & making eye contact with others, but that's why his one release was his Xbox Live. He didn't have to converse with people directly. His mom wouldn't have anything to do with it, and neither would him. Just because Microsoft says he cheated doesn't mean he did. They just want to complain about how someone who can beat their games without cheat codes is bad for business.
I am sticking up for the little guy because SOMEONE has to!! I know what it's like to have a medical disability & be treated like dirt.
I'm actually a little more disturbed that a "mother" trying to show her son in the right has a twitter name of "Cold A** Sunshine." It makes it harder to take her seriously. I'm not sure why, but I look at that and I'm like, "really?"Jamash said:The mother's Twitter account makes for an interesting read:
https://twitter.com/ColdAssSunshine
She claims that her son's account was accessed from "out of state" by another user, which begs the question: why is she letting her 11 year old autistic son play M rated games over X-Box Live and get his account phished?
Surely she must have been privy to the conversation when this other user asked for the account details... or does she just let her 11 year old autistic son communicate with everyone unsupervised?
It seems every time she tries to pass the blame onto someone else, it actually reflects badly on her.
I completely agree I was about to edit it saying that. I apologize and I in no way meant to say he or any autistic person was stupid. It is amazing what they can do; I apologize once again if that is how I sounded or if I offended anyone.MaxPowers666 said:Some autistic kids are are absolute geniusses in some areas especially when it comes to math. Figuring out how to hack your gamerscore especially with the internet is probably extremely easy as well. My cousin is autistic and you tell him and date, day, month and year and he will yell you which day of the week it is. So just because the kid is autistic doesnt mean hes stupid.akibawall95 said:I do not know how an autistic kid figured out how to boost his Gamerscore I don?t even know how to do that (I am not trying to be insensitive about the child's autism). I'm sure that Microsoft did not know that the kid was autistic when they labeled him as a cheater but if he really (which they are now saying has) did boost his Gamerscore illegitimately then what they did was fully justified.
But it's not a highscore system, it's a percent completion system multiplied by ten. Let's put it in these terms; say I play games for the challenge, but you play them for the story. I put a single player game on the hardest difficulty, and struggle through it all the way to the end. You, on the other hand, cheat to make it easier to get through the story. Does it really hurt me in any way that, at the end of the day, your completion bar reads the same as mine? So why should it matter that some kid may or may not have cheated on his gamer score?Anton P. Nym said:That's not correct. Or, at the very least, it's hypocritical unless you think that falsifying one's standing on a game's global leaderboards also hurts no one.Owyn_Merrilin said:Cheating to get achievements hurts noone, and regardless of who did it, Microsoft is the one in the wrong here.
Whether you do or not, many people do attach value to their Gamerscore... and allowing others to cheat 'em upward does hurt that sense of value by calling into question whether a score was earned by one's efforts or was "earned" with thirty seconds' use of the Internet and a USB flash drive.
(That being said, I never did agree with the "Cheater" branding of one's gamertag... I see why it's there, for deterrant value, but I worry about any tendencies it would have to provoke online vigilantism. That's a debatable issue, though, with a lot of pros and cons. I do certainly agree with the total stripping of all prior GS, though, as a punitive measure.)
-- Steve
It isn't slander if it is true.ecoho said:ok i dont suport cheating but this is kinda just BS if you dont want people exploting your achivments then make them cheat proof to begen with. Oh and i do beleave this lableing as a cheater basicly is slander but i may be wrong on that.
I see where you are coming from, but you kind of shot yourself in the foot with your point about the GameShark where you acknowledge that cheating should be restricted to single player experiences.Owyn_Merrilin said:But it's not a highscore system, it's a percent completion system multiplied by ten. Let's put it in these terms; say I play games for the challenge, but you play them for the story. I put a single player game on the hardest difficulty, and struggle through it all the way to the end. You, on the other hand, cheat to make it easier to get through the story. Does it really hurt me in any way that, at the end of the day, your completion bar reads the same as mine? So why should it matter that some kid may or may not have cheated on his gamer score?
I'd really like my gameshark back, Microsoft. Fit it with some sort of lockout chip that recognizes multiplayer modes if you have to, but bring back singleplayer cheats. They were so much fun to screw around with back in the day.
Just because you don't value something doesn't mean it doesn't have value.robinkom said:-snip-
He is a child and mentally handicapped, you cannot expect logical behavior from someone like that.Tankichi said:Microsoft. Now attacking Handicapped people for profit.
I highly doubt he was cheating. It seems unlikely that he would cheat to get a high achievement score then when he gets banned he gets upset. It's not a logical move even for an autistic.