I agree with you, that it's the greater evil of the bigots who complained against her, which got her ToU violation noticed by Microsoft, that is the real issue here, not that she got banned for being a lesbian.Baby Tea said:Whoops! My bad!joystickjunki3 said:Pretty sure it wasn't me who said that. I did quote the guy that said it, though.
You had me up until this point. While I'll certainly concede that the terms of service were, technically, violated, I can pretty guarantee that you would not get banned for having anything in your profile that alluded to your enjoyment of women in a sexual way (Keeping it at the same level of saying 'I'm a lesbian'). All the prepubescent, tween, and frat guys would just say 'hur hur, I like gurlz too!!!one!', and then who would complain?Jamash said:I'm sure that if I put in my profile that I'm a man who likes having sex with women, that I'm not homosexual or that I'm a straight man, I would get banned too
Really, it's bigotry that got her 'caught' and that is what I'm really annoyed about.
exactly, why do people put personal information (f.x. sexual orientation) on their gamertag?Wouldukindly said:This is mildly upsetting...but I have to ask...why can't we just keep our sexual orientation to ourselves in online games?
Oh I don't think so. Saying you're straight doesn't mean you're homophobic. It's saying you're straight. Just like this girl probably didn't mean anything malicious or demeaning to straight people. And I'm very certain that the homosexual community wouldn't take offense to you saying you're straight, or that you like women. It would simply be way too hypocritical.Jamash said:Also, as well as violating the Terms of Use, mentioning that I'm straight in my profile seem a bit bigoted. It implies that I think homosexuality is wrong, at least to the extent that I want to make it abundantly clear to everyone that I'll game with that I'm not homosexual.
Making a point of not being gay in my profile is reason enough for homosexual users to file a complaint against my account, which in turn would bring my ToU violation to Microsoft's attention.
That is exactly the truth, very insightful with that parenthetical. And as much as people like to demonize them for that attitude, what else would you have it do?Jamash said:I agree with you, that it's the greater evil of the bigots who complained against her, which got her ToU violation noticed by Microsoft, that is the real issue here, not that she got banned for being a lesbian.
Microsoft can be accused of being many things, but I don't think homophobic is one of them (it's just not profitable to alienate a large section of society).
That's not what I mean. I mean you listen to teenagers (and even some kids) and they use the word "gay" to denote something bad. That's the real problem. Using the word itself is not the problem, it's what you mean by it. It's like the N-word which I choose not to use (you know the one). Rappers use it one way, but some people use it as a racial slur. It's all about how you use the word.mrfredy5 said:But then what about homosexuals who call themselves gay and are part of gay rights groups surely it isn't an insult if the people who it is dirrected call themselves gay themself.shadow_pirate22 said:One thing is, the term "gay" is probably blocked for being an inappropriate slur against anyone, not necessarily just gay people. That's one of the main problems with society today. If we keep using those words as insults to other people, it's going to be hard to make progress.
Please try to understand that I am not disagreeing with you. I do NOT think she deserved to be banned or suffer any lasting penalties for her profile. I think she has a perfectly legitimate position here. It IS who she is and she doesn't have to apologize for that to anyone else.Baby Tea said:Because it's a part of her life! I have that I'm a Christian on my profile, because it's a big part of my life! Both her, I, and anyone else shouldn't have to apologize or change our profiles because someone else thought something as simple as faith or sexual orientation is 'offensive'. It isn't promoting hate, it isn't saying 'convert to lesbianism!', it's just talking about her and who she is.Wouldukindly said:As much as this seems wrong, that's the only thing that sort of bothers me, I mean, I could go into detail about my lizard fetish on my account, but it may upset a few peoplekawligia said:Well on one hand, simply mentioning that she is a lesbian is not really that offensive. Everyone knows they exist. I doubt any kids are going to go gay just because they met someone on the internet who claimed to be.
BUT...
On the other hand, there really is no reason to display your sexual preferences in that time and place. Its not exactly the type of environment where you would announce a foot fetish or love of BDSM, so why does anyone need to announce being gay or straight? It's irrelevant and unnecessary.
I see two wrongs here. That girl should have kept her bedroom in her bedroom like everyone else and Microsoft should have just had her simply change her profile.
I understand it's an 'About Me' column, but you have to be a little realistic when you're on a network like Xbox Live. I'm not saying it's right they banned her, I'm just saying one has to wonder 'why'.
This isn't her fault in any way or form, and the people who did this to her (If I dare call them 'people') should be nothing short of ashamed for it, and they should be the ones who are banned.
Root, I wuv you.The_root_of_all_evil said:Microsoft: Because bigots pay more than you do.
Not sure what my status has to do anything but the fact you reconized it's me and missed the humour and my post might mean you don't watch my show. When I say fag is a "perfectly acceptable" racial slur, I am meaning it as what everyone who uses it via internet gaming.SuperMse said:Also, how will saying "gay" turn Xbox Live or PSN into Red Light Districts? It can be used to describe many things, and even if used to describe the orientation, I doubt Xbox Live or PSN would become all about sex. Besides, she just said she was a lesbian in her "About Me" section, so its not like she was advertising it; she just thought that it was something about her important enough to put in her profile.
Then how did people know? Oh wait they most likely looked her up. Saw she was a lesbian. Wait what? Why is that kind of personal information in a Xbox live profile.Aries_Split said:I don't think she was flaunting it sir.SirSchmoopy said:Fag = Lesbian anyway imo. Perfectly acceptable racial slur and most likely she was called a fag not because she was gay but because she was being a fag which is totally different in the internet world.
The problem is more complex than that.Fruitloops89 said:So being open to your sexuality = bad enough to get suspended/banned from Xbox Live.
But being a prick and calling people fags, whores, ass holes, douche bags, or any other words that would make a childs ear bleed, even though it is most likely coming from them, is OK and not a suspendable/ban worthy offense?
I tell ya, some peoples kids...
This. The whole affair is a tempest in a teapot. Not that lesbians are gender-identity baiters as a rule, but I've known several with enough pent-up angst to take it to the streets when they didn't need to.Anton P. Nym said:So it's not that proclaiming one's undying love for boys/girls/hamsters/etc is the greater offense than hooting-dickholery, it's that violating the Terms of Use in writing is easier to catch and correct than violating the Terms vocally unless people report these violations with the tools provided, preferably every time.
-- Steve
I report every one of these people AND rate them down. Hint, hint: having a magic speaking device does not mean you have permission to make my ears bleed. I do not appreciate your suggestions about what my mother does in her spare time. You also happen to be 10, which means that you should shut up now, as you don't know what you're talking about.Anton P. Nym said:The problem is more complex than that.Fruitloops89 said:So being open to your sexuality = bad enough to get suspended/banned from Xbox Live.
But being a prick and calling people fags, whores, ass holes, douche bags, or any other words that would make a childs ear bleed, even though it is most likely coming from them, is OK and not a suspendable/ban worthy offense?
I tell ya, some peoples kids...
Our Lady of the Martyred Dignity was suspended because of sexual content in her profile, in print and indisputable as to who put it there. People (rightly or wrongly) found it offensive and reported it to Microsoft through the built-in reporting tools, and the Live staff found a violation of the Code of Conduct. Suspension followed, probably a short-term one with a warning to change her profile.
The Fearless Microphone Abusers, however, do their antics over voice chat... and because these antics are ubiquitous no one seems to want to bother to rat them out. I'll also add that unless it's a voice message sent directly to Our Lady's mailbox it's not recorded, so accusations of verbal abuse come down to "he said / she said" unless you start getting significant volumes of reports about particular users. (Or a user is unlucky enough to flap his/her gums in front of a Live employee who happens to be playing in the same match. It's fun to see that happen, but alas it's very rare to witness.)
So it's not that proclaiming one's undying love for boys/girls/hamsters/etc is the greater offense than hooting-dickholery, it's that violating the Terms of Use in writing is easier to catch and correct than violating the Terms vocally unless people report these violations with the tools provided, preferably every time.
-- Steve
yup..its a sad world...seriously Microsoft -10 for you!!!shadow_pirate22 said:One thing is, the term "gay" is probably blocked for being an inappropriate slur against anyone, not necessarily just gay people. That's one of the main problems with society today. If we keep using those words as insults to other people, it's going to be hard to make progress.