I've actually thought that Uwe boll might want to try his hand at doing romantic Vampire movies, given the usual quality they are right up his alley, and who knows he might actually wind up with a sincere following of people calling him a cinematic genius given the standards by which such movies are judged. I already consider his work a step up from the "Twilight" movies because heck, I at least found his movies like "House Of The Dead" entertaining on some levels and have watched them more than once just for fun, which is more than I can say for "Twilight"... I was forced to sit through the second movie and really... it wasn't the kind of bad you could appreciate on any level.
That said, I'll also say that Uwe Boll does deserve some credit for touching material most people won't even attempt. To some extent his work reminds me of a lot of the stuff Roger Corman has turned out over the years... If it wasn't for the ofttimes beloved liscences I'd think people would be treating some of these in a similar vein to movies like "Sharktopus" which have become sort of geek cult classics due to the horrendous ridiculousness of it all.
Let's see what happens though, just going by the odds eventually he has to turn out a good video game adaption movie, even if it's by accident.
Also as a side note I'll say that Dolph's movie credits are probably because he wasn't the star of "Rocky 4" but he WAS the star of "He-Man" and it's probably his most wide spread starring role given that it was released as a blockbuster, and despite the reasons for it remaining in memory it's kind of a cult classic. "The Expendables" has him in a major role and is a current success. What's more in both "Rocky" and "Universal Soldier" he was the bad guy and this movie is presenting him as a hero. In "The Expendables" he's a mess and plays a bad guy role for part of it, but also arguably redeems himself and presumably gets to be one of the good guys in the next movie. Just some points to consider.