Valve Counters EA's Shots at Steam

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
Eric the Orange said:
While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.

EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
This is probably because Valve tries to make life better for the consumer AND the developers. Sure, devs, you can have your DRM, but we'll make it improve the experience, rather than what Ubisoft, Activision or EA do.
 

Eric the Orange

Gone Gonzo
Apr 29, 2008
3,245
0
0
Rainboq said:
Eric the Orange said:
While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.

EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
This is probably because Valve tries to make life better for the consumer AND the developers. Sure, devs, you can have your DRM, but we'll make it improve the experience, rather than what Ubisoft, Activision or EA do.
I'm not saying I don't understand why it is, I do, only that it is.
 

Absolutionis

New member
Sep 18, 2008
420
0
0
Ympulse said:
Eric the Orange said:
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.

Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
However, Valve doesn't sodomize mothers. They've earned our trust. They've made some mistakes, but ultimately they own up to it and try to fix it.

Dismissing EA's criticism by saying people are bandwagonning is just flawed logic.

dontlooknow said:
Clearly, no one at Valve has heard the phrase 'don't feed the trolls.'
True. EA's big marketing scheme nowadays is to trash-talk the top contender in an effort to make themselves seem like the second-choice at best and relevant at worst.

Meanwhile their PR is awful and their stock is the worst it has been in over 12 years.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
Welp. They're right. Example. Say someone got Assassins Creed 1 and 2 for real cheap on the sale, and really enjoyed it. Chances of preordering/buying the next game at full price? Pretty high.

But damn Valve you don't need to explain yourselves to EA of all things, you're better than that. Stay vigilant.
 

Kataskopo

New member
Dec 18, 2009
121
0
0
I wonder for how long will EA be able to keep running while being so oblivious to the real world.
It's a business after all, how can they afford to be so stupid? Why would you like to work with them knowing management it's so antagonistic against consumers?

They are their own parody, it's so freaking depressive when you think about it.
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
matrix3509 said:
I love how EA is trying to guilt trip the people who wait for sales. "HOW DARE YOU NOT PAY FULL PRICE!" Sorry EA, I am guilt free.
It's just their newest target. "Piracy ruins the gaming industry!!! Oh wait...we can't stop the pirates. Okay then, used sales ruin the gaming industry!!! ...shit. Okay guys I got it! Steam sales ruin the gaming industry!!!"
 

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
Is this really even news? EA is full of accountant morons, Valve is the golden poster child for gamers who "get it." Of course one is going to say something completely gobshite and Valve is going to wink at the rest of us and we'll all share a quiet little elitist gamer gigglefest at EA's expense.
 

Neonsilver

New member
Aug 11, 2009
289
0
0
RandV80 said:
It wasn't on a Steam sale but in a similar nature to Introversion/Darwinia the original Humble Indy Bundle deal gave which included one of the Penumbra titles gave Frictional Games enough of a cash infusion to pay the bills and finish making Amnesia: The Dark Descent.

These are indy companies though. For the big mega publishers like EA and Activision who for a business model rely on an annual release schedule where the community itself puts pressure in players to always be up to date on the latest releases and/or dlc, there's no real benefit to the Steam sale model. But thankfully this fight at least seems like one where the big guys aren't going to win. EA can try but they aren't going to get their way here.
Well, I started with the Mass Effect series by buying the first game for 10? I think, I enjoyed it enough that I bought the second game and I enjoyed that enough that I decided to preorder the third.
Similar thing with Dragon Age, bought it when the price dropped a little and enjoyed it, so I preordered Dragon Age 2.

So EA got a lot of money from me because I bought 2 games on a budget and decided afterwards to buy it's sequels for the full price, without the budgets I might have looked at the games but probably wouldn't have bought them.

I think that this is a good example why even the big companys benefit from the steam sale model.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
As I said in the initial article regarding this topic:

Personally, I think constantly pumping out sequels and rebooting classic games into safe, mass market appeal games cheapens IP's. *Cough* Syndicate *cough*
 

Zulnam

New member
Feb 22, 2010
481
0
0
You know, EA, I turned a blind eye with Battlefield. When you called out Activision to come to the playground and defend their sand castle, I just told myself "boys will be boys". But now? Picking on Valve? You have serious issues, man. Seek help.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
SnakeoilSage said:
Is this really even news? EA is full of accountant morons, Valve is the golden poster child for gamers who "get it." Of course one is going to say something completely gobshite and Valve is going to wink at the rest of us and we'll all share a quiet little elitist gamer gigglefest at EA's expense.
Indeed.



Ympulse said:
My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.

Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
In other news, EA's stocks hit an all time low, lay-offs are rampant, they continue to shutdown and undercut their internal devs at a record pace, they continue to push costumers away with price gouging and restrictive services/features, they still create over-priced DLC, simplify IPs to appeal to a "wider audience", and (if rumors are to be believed) are set to fire a few CEOs/COOs; all because of their "correct" statements and business practices.

At the same time, Valve hits all time high in profit revenues; both internally and for other devs who use their services. They also continue to provide free services and content to users as well as continuing to update and upgrade said services with new features.

Yep. You're right. EA clearly knows what they're talking about and Valve is full of shit. I mean, it's not like EA is literally in the process of going under or anything. And it's clear Valve is planning to sodomize our mothers because we're not dropping enough cash for TF2 crate keys.

Yep. It all makes sense now. Can't believe I was so blind. How could I have possibly admired Valve?! What's wrong with me?!
 

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
Vigormortis said:
Yep. It all makes sense now. Can't believe I was so blind. How could I have possibly admired Valve?! What's wrong with me?!
Annnnd there's the wink again.
 

b3nn3tt

New member
May 11, 2010
673
0
0
See, this is exactly the kind of thing that the EA PR department should take note of. This is how you endear people to you and make them actually want to give you money. I have no doubts that Valve is run with a goal of making as much money as they can, in the same way that EA do. The difference, however, is that Valve are capable of doing this without making the entire gaming community hate them for it, because actually they seem to genuinely care about there customers. Whether they do or not is irrelevant, it's all about perception. Would you rather give money to someone who has openly admitted that they will try to fleece you for every penny they can, or someone that offers you a bloody good deal on a game whilst being friendly about it?

I think I rambled on a bit there. Basically, this is how companies should talk to the public if they want people to want to give them money.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
uncanny474 said:
In other news: EA is still full of blithering idiots who don't know the first thing about gaming OR running a business and who have pissed off consumers more than Bank of America. More at 11.

EA: FREQUENT SALES CHEAPEN IPs


The next week.

ORIGIN IS HAVING A SALE, YAAAY!
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
Ympulse said:
Eric the Orange said:
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.

Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
Its funny how EA fanboys so desperately try to rationalize. EA kicks puppies then tries to sell them to you at full price. Valve doesn't kick them and sells them at 75% off.

Seriously, EA fanboy. People like Valve cause they don't do the evil bullshit that EA does. Just deal with it. Even when they do something people find disagreeable, they don't send out their puppy kicking PR squad to call you, the consumer, a thief or shameful or something cause you don't like it. There's good companies and there's bad ones. Valve is one of the very few good ones.
 

Stilkon

New member
Feb 19, 2011
304
0
0
Oh, look at that, Valve backed up their statements with data. How nice of them. EA should do that too.
 

Bvenged

New member
Sep 4, 2009
1,203
0
0
kitsuta said:
As for the increase in pre-orders and early sales, Holtman theorized that gamers who buy games on sale will fall in love with titles they would never have otherwise played, then eagerly purchase the next title in that franchise or from that developer. Thanks to the magic of digital distribution, gamers can easily pick up titles released months or even years prior - a luxury that wasn't available back in the olden days when PC games only came in boxes, when "if you didn't get a game in the first three months it was around, you were out of luck because you had to find a copy of it." That convenience, in turn, is "making people happier" and thus more willing to pick up titles at full price later down the road.
That's why Valve are smart and EA are greedy. you hit the nail on the head there, Valve.

I used to mostly buy games months after release, second hand, because I was buying a game I was unsure about for cheaper than the new copies. If I liked it, I bought similar games or sequels of the franchise new and much earlier because I knew I'd enjoy it (better investment with lower risk of wasting money) or even purchase them through pre-order if I really liked it (full investment confidence in product because of previous second-hand purchase).

Example: I bought Gears 2 second-hand, pre-ordered Gears 3 because I saw it as a low risk for disliking it, and thus a better investment.

Steam sales are the same thing. If I like a game, I buy it sooner rather than later. If I don't like a game or am unsure, I buy it second hand, or now in a steam sale. Buying in a sale is better for the developer & publisher than second hand, because thy're still getting a slice of the pie.
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
Holtman theorized that gamers who buy games on sale will fall in love with titles they would never have otherwise played, then eagerly purchase the next title in that franchise or from that developer.
This is pretty much what I was going to say, as I've done this many many times myself thanks to Steam. I AM more willing to buy a brand new game or even pre order it if I got the previous title in a sale and loved it.

Torchlight is my most recent example, because I only bought Torchlight in a sale and wouldn't have otherwise picked it up, and now having played it and fucking loved it, I want Torchlight 2, so I've pre ordered it.