Valve Counters EA's Shots at Steam

Quazimofo

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,370
0
0
Otaku World Order said:
Ympulse said:
Eric the Orange said:
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.

Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
Last time I checked, Valve wasn't charging $50 to get to the front of the line in online multiplayer or adding subscription fees and DLC to freaking Tetris. If there's any sodomizing going on, it's not Valve's doing.

Just sayin'.

wait wait wait wait wait..... TETRIS!!!?!?!? subscription to TETRIS?!?!?!? thats.. thats just stupid because i can play tetris for free.
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,721
0
0
Just imagine, if this was the Dark Ages, Valve would be the good, heroic and beloved king while EA would be the ugly, scheming vizier.
 

Jessta

New member
Feb 8, 2011
382
0
0
My brief experience with this stems from League of legends, I had decided when I first started I would never spend any money on the game, then a skin I reallllllly like went on sale half price so I decided to dump in 10 bucks and buy the skin on sale, I then had half of enough for another skin in RP so I spent another 5 bucks and bought a full price skin, overall I spent 15 dollars where I would have spent none if that initial skin hadn't gone on sale. Then a month later they did an 80% sale on a bunch of skins so I dumped in 30 bucks and purchased like 10 of em then had enough left over for another half a skin so I waited until one I liked went on sale.

Overall I spent 45$ on a free game entirely because of the sales prices, I think it was a good call on their part, plus after I started using the system in order to take part in the limited time sales I became more comfortable with it, the first time around it was kind of stressful typing down all that personal information and shit but second time about I just clicked a button and got my stuff, once I was used to this system I ended up spending another 20 bucks on skins and characters that had been recently released at full price.
From that little bit of hindsight on my prior experiences with it I would say sales are a great way to increase your customer base as well as encourage previous buyers to continue, I've spent 65$ on a free game where as I refuse to spend 60$ on a triple A game, almost entirely because of sales. I mean I guess EAs logic would work if NO ONE ever had sales so you never had to compete with them but that's simply not the case.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
There are good points here, but... the big issue is, you don't enter into a slap-fight with the schoolyard bully. It doesn't matter what he said about your momma. Humouring him isn't going to make him back off and recognize your good qualities, it'll only make him come back harder. It's what he does. He doesn't have anything better to do.

When the teacher comes around, they're not going to care who started it. You'll both end up looking like petty children.

In other news, I don't care if it's the popular thing to do; I'll stop hating EA when it miraculously stops being a cautionary tale about the pursuit of money over customers and restores the countless companies it has destroyed. Valve isn't sinless, but putting their groundbreaking service next to EA's late-to-the-party shameless cash-in service is just too easy.
 

Mr Companion

New member
Jul 27, 2009
1,534
0
0
All Steam really had to do was point at their profit margins as a comeback but yeah all that stuff too. In fact, all that stuff on top of what Shamus Young has been saying for ages now.

Also EA is hilariously villain like, its almost contrived.
I mean, its just so funny to see them fuming away at origin angrily complaining about Steam getting all the money even though they keep treating their customers well. Its like they're saying "How are they doing it? They aren't extorting or overcharging their customers at all! Do they WANT their users to expect good things from them?!".
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Huh. Valve could have responded by faxing them a picture of Gabe Newell's ass and we would probably support them. They didn't need to bother coming up with a response to EA's attack.
 

Andrew_C

New member
Mar 1, 2011
460
0
0
Seeing as i just finally got around to buying Mass Effect 2 , and only bought it because it was on sale at Steam, I don't think EA knows what they are talking about. I buy most of my games on sale, whether on Steam, at GoG, or at the local game shop.

And the reason I never pay full price for games? DRM
 

Nimzabaat

New member
Feb 1, 2010
886
0
0
Ympulse said:
Eric the Orange said:
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.

Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
I think that's limited to this website. I don't see nearly as much love for Valve anywhere else.
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
If déjà vu is a glitch in the Matrix, the Matrix must have had Superman 64's quality assurance team.

Seriously, this the the how-manyth repetition of that topic and almost identical headline?
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
uncanny474 said:
In other news: EA is still full of blithering idiots who don't know the first thing about gaming OR running a business and who have pissed off consumers more than Bank of America. More at 11.
Let's face it, the attitude they approached the sales with said it all. "Valve are stupid because they put games on sale. We're better than them because we'll never do that. Have fun using our service, guys, you'll never get cheap games!"

Fucking idiots. EA has never been good with PR and it's user base hates them, they love the games but hate EA. Valve on the other hand are loved by their user base.
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,840
0
0
AT God said:
if I had payed full price for their first two games they might have made ME3 good on release instead of 3 months later.
...

....Sarcasm?

Otherwise I don't see the logic there. BioWare/EA are hardly strapped strapped for cash and I doubt a few extra sales of ME 1 & 2 would have helped. Regardless, ME3's ending was a creative decision. As far as they were concerned, it was finished at launch.

Eric the Orange said:
While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.

EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
At the moment, yeah, it's a lot like that. However, one has only to look at BioWare's fall from grace to see just how quickly public sentiment can bite you in the ass. Moreover, the more popular you are, the more people hate you when you fall.

If valve ever does fall in the public's perspective, I suspect they'll fall hard.


Captcha: Steam Punk...... creepy.....
 

JET1971

New member
Apr 7, 2011
836
0
0
Another view aside from "If i liked it i will buy the next at full price" is having huge sales on games brings in customers who never would have bought the game at all. I have 3 titles that i bought on sales that i never would have touched ever. sales make customers, it is that simple.

Also those who are going to wait for the price to drop were going to wait anyway, keeping the price high forever and they just wont buy it. Those who do buy it at full price were going to already, not because they said they wont lower the price so you might as well buy now.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Darkmantle said:
Good on valve, I like when a good company defends itself.
I guess we have to settle for Valve defending itself, though.

canadamus_prime said:
Yeah! Doing something that benefits your customers and thus would encourage them to buy more of your products? What blasphemy is this?
/sarcasm

Seriously EA, I think you've reached entirely new depths of stupid.
Don't forget the part where they then did it.

Eric the Orange said:
While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.

EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
Shhh...Don't address the elephant in the room.
 

Drejer43

New member
Nov 18, 2009
386
0
0
though in all honesty, id rather that games just slowly fall in price rather than some games still being full price a year after release, but since no one wants to do that I'm just gonna settle with what steam is doing
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
I feel like Valve intuitively knows good business. They're the good guys that just tries a make everyone happy first, and then money will come.

Like they are shitting on everyone else, looking good while doing it.
 

Clearing the Eye

New member
Jun 6, 2012
1,345
0
0
Ville Vuorela said:
Clearing the Eye said:
Oh it's still cool to pretend you hate EA in this forum? Neat.
I don't hate them... No, wait, *Syndicate*. Yes, I do.
A good friend loved that game (the remake). Couldn't say enough about the fun they had playing it. But all I hear from others is how bad it is. I don't think they are a freak, so I can't work out if I'm hearing a vocal minority that's jaded by nostalgia, or if he is indeed just weird.
 

the_green_dragon

New member
Nov 18, 2009
660
0
0
AT God said:
As stupid as these comments are, they have a point. I bought Mass Effect 1 and 2 on steam, thought they were great. Then they released ME3 and I paid 60 dollars for a piece of crap. They might be on to something, if I had payed full price for their first two games they might have made ME3 good on release instead of 3 months later. Damn EA and their solid logic!
This.

So true. Damn you ME3
 

lapan

New member
Jan 23, 2009
1,456
1
0
They didn't even need this statement , EA did an excellent job countering their own point themselves.