Just imagine, if this was the Dark Ages, Valve would be the good, heroic and beloved king while EA would be the ugly, scheming vizier.
I don't hate them... No, wait, *Syndicate*. Yes, I do.Clearing the Eye said:Oh it's still cool to pretend you hate EA in this forum? Neat.
I think that's limited to this website. I don't see nearly as much love for Valve anywhere else.Ympulse said:My opinion on this as well. EA's people are correct in a vast majority of their statements, but hating EA is cool.Eric the Orange said:EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
Valve, on the other hand, can sodomize your mother, and the gaming public would give them money for it.
Let's face it, the attitude they approached the sales with said it all. "Valve are stupid because they put games on sale. We're better than them because we'll never do that. Have fun using our service, guys, you'll never get cheap games!"uncanny474 said:In other news: EA is still full of blithering idiots who don't know the first thing about gaming OR running a business and who have pissed off consumers more than Bank of America. More at 11.
...AT God said:if I had payed full price for their first two games they might have made ME3 good on release instead of 3 months later.
At the moment, yeah, it's a lot like that. However, one has only to look at BioWare's fall from grace to see just how quickly public sentiment can bite you in the ass. Moreover, the more popular you are, the more people hate you when you fall.Eric the Orange said:While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
I guess we have to settle for Valve defending itself, though.Darkmantle said:Good on valve, I like when a good company defends itself.
Don't forget the part where they then did it.canadamus_prime said:Yeah! Doing something that benefits your customers and thus would encourage them to buy more of your products? What blasphemy is this?
/sarcasm
Seriously EA, I think you've reached entirely new depths of stupid.
Shhh...Don't address the elephant in the room.Eric the Orange said:While I agree with valve entirely, I think considering the reputation of both companies, if there was an argument between them people would always side with valve no matter what.
EA: Kicking puppies is bad
Valve: We like kicking puppies
The Public: Valve has a point
A good friend loved that game (the remake). Couldn't say enough about the fun they had playing it. But all I hear from others is how bad it is. I don't think they are a freak, so I can't work out if I'm hearing a vocal minority that's jaded by nostalgia, or if he is indeed just weird.Ville Vuorela said:I don't hate them... No, wait, *Syndicate*. Yes, I do.Clearing the Eye said:Oh it's still cool to pretend you hate EA in this forum? Neat.
This.AT God said:As stupid as these comments are, they have a point. I bought Mass Effect 1 and 2 on steam, thought they were great. Then they released ME3 and I paid 60 dollars for a piece of crap. They might be on to something, if I had payed full price for their first two games they might have made ME3 good on release instead of 3 months later. Damn EA and their solid logic!
There's nothing wrong with valve, I'd dare say they are one of the best big game companies in the business, name 3 better champ.Zachary Amaranth said:I guess we have to settle for Valve defending itself, though.Darkmantle said:Good on valve, I like when a good company defends itself.
See, now you've shifted the goalposts. In a cesspool like the gaming industry, "better" doesn't translate into "good."Darkmantle said:There's nothing wrong with valve, I'd dare say they are one of the best big game companies in the business, name 3 better champ.