You horribly underestimate the drive for prettiness and convenience.Nocturnus said:Still seems like a one man crusade to reinvent the wheel that need not be reinvented.
In order to run the grand majority of Steam's Games (IE: Windows and MacOS), you will have to have the games installed through Steam somewhere else on the home network.
Most people who know how to get that set up, or have it set up that way, will probably just end up sticking to their current Steam Setup. Others who are just dying to have PC Games in the living room probably already have it going. Those who don't want to deal with this? Buy a Console like the PlayStation.
There's no room around my TV to jam my massive computer. If I decide I want to play games on my TV, why would I buy a console AND my whole library over again when I can now download a free OS with LAN streaming?
Apparently, a large chunk of users are still using XP, and they don't want to alienate them.Nocturnus said:I really wish Valve would pay attention to some things that really need paying attention to instead of these really weird projects.Like... how about we get a Steam Client that isn't from the Windows XP Era? Takes advantage of all the new features of Windows and MacOS? Seems like a pipe-dream at this point.