Vatican Voices Disapproval for Confession iPhone App

Recommended Videos

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.
 

techercat

New member
Feb 11, 2011
1
0
0
Actually, all the app was meant to do to begin with is to help a person prepare for the Sacrament of Confession. It's roughly equivalent to a sheet of paper that outlines an examination of conscience (what sins did I commit, how serious were they, how many times did I commit them) and the process of the sacrament (what Father So-and-so says, what I am supposed to say at which points). The app doesn't celebrate the sacrament in place of a priest any more than a piece of paper with that information would.

It's supposed to be a refresher for people who have been away from confession for a while, and a tool for helping people make better confessions overall.

From the developers' website (http://www.littleiapps.com/overview.php): "Designed to be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent."

So it's not a disapproval from the Vatican, but rather a clarification. What Fr. Lombardi says in no way contradicts what the developers of the app are doing or saying.
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
Wait a second. Does the app actually claim to administer the sacrament of confession? Or does it just claim to ASSIST? Because no priest in his right mind would okay an app that administers the sacrament - it's likely an excommunicating offense!

Is there a demo of this app so we can see if the Church is banning the app or the media's IMAGE of the app?
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
spartan231490 said:
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.

(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
techercat said:
Actually, all the app was meant to do to begin with is to help a person prepare for the Sacrament of Confession. It's roughly equivalent to a sheet of paper that outlines an examination of conscience (what sins did I commit, how serious were they, how many times did I commit them) and the process of the sacrament (what Father So-and-so says, what I am supposed to say at which points). The app doesn't celebrate the sacrament in place of a priest any more than a piece of paper with that information would.

It's supposed to be a refresher for people who have been away from confession for a while, and a tool for helping people make better confessions overall.

From the developers' website (http://www.littleiapps.com/overview.php): "Designed to be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent."

So it's not a disapproval from the Vatican, but rather a clarification. What Fr. Lombardi says in no way contradicts what the developers of the app are doing or saying.
Well if THAT'S the case, then this article is pointless. Yay.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.

(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
Truth is truth, refusal to accept it is idiotic. "Willingly turning aside from the truth is treason to oneself."
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,175
0
0
Cliff_m85 said:
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
Yea, but you're not the target market for the app. The market is for believers, and believers go with the Vatican.
 

UnkeptBiscuit

New member
Jun 25, 2009
363
0
0
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.
 

PunkyMcGee

A Clever Title
Apr 5, 2010
811
0
0
techercat said:
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.

(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
Darn anti-theists giving us levelheaded atheists a bad name. It's much like reasonable Catholics being judged based on the few wackos.

(Well I guess that I'm more of an agnostic in this regard, but whatever)
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
UnkeptBiscuit said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.
Well, not equivalent. That's rather overstating things. The last word? Sure. But making a proclamation ex cathedra isn't something they do every day.
 

LordWalter

New member
Sep 19, 2009
343
0
0
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.

(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
/amusement. Well that's some fun shorthand for intellectual cowardice. Why critically engage with arguments when we can stick our fingers in our ears and go "LA DA LA DEE LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" ?
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
16,609
5,169
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
Suilenroc said:
i agree with the Vatican on this one. Making confession an app is quite silly. it's a rite of repentance. Making it convenient sorta defeats the whole thing.
the whole thing is rather silly when you think about it, can only confess your crimes when your in a lil box to a representative, odds are the vat is worried that they will lose all that phat tithing money that jesus says they arnt supposed to be taking anyway
 

PunkyMcGee

A Clever Title
Apr 5, 2010
811
0
0
techercat said:
Actually, all the app was meant to do to begin with is to help a person prepare for the Sacrament of Confession. It's roughly equivalent to a sheet of paper that outlines an examination of conscience (what sins did I commit, how serious were they, how many times did I commit them) and the process of the sacrament (what Father So-and-so says, what I am supposed to say at which points). The app doesn't celebrate the sacrament in place of a priest any more than a piece of paper with that information would.

It's supposed to be a refresher for people who have been away from confession for a while, and a tool for helping people make better confessions overall.

From the developers' website (http://www.littleiapps.com/overview.php): "Designed to be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent."

So it's not a disapproval from the Vatican, but rather a clarification. What Fr. Lombardi says in no way contradicts what the developers of the app are doing or saying.
Well now that I've read this I fell a bit silly. If this is indeed the case this debate is pointless.
 

UnkeptBiscuit

New member
Jun 25, 2009
363
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
UnkeptBiscuit said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.
Well, not equivalent. That's rather overstating things. The last word? Sure. But making a proclamation ex cathedra isn't something they do every day.
Well, not every day of course, but they do claim the right to be the only correct interpretation of the Bible, which, since the Bible is the word of God, roughly translates into the ability to state what is basically the word of God. And since Jesus wasn't around for the iPhone, that gives the Vatican the power to give edicts on what the official Church position on something is.
 

thom_cat_

New member
Nov 30, 2008
1,286
0
0
spartan231490 said:
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
lacktheknack said:
spartan231490 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Toriver said:
Natdaprat said:
So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.
Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.


It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.

(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
Truth is truth, refusal to accept it is idiotic. "Willingly turning aside from the truth is treason to oneself."
I'm confused... what "truths" are you talking about?
also I thought you said truths were irrelevent... "Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power."
And there's plenty of reasons to turn away from God, the fact that there is no evidence to support it is one, and the fact that there is evidence to several theories that go against a lot of what some religions say is another.
Also, when did someone have to tell you why they don't believe? I don't have to justify why I don't believe in fairies or unicorns. You should be the one justifying why you believe in something without evidence. (Whoo! Antitheism!)
 

Cakes

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,036
0
0
Soon there will be apps for every religious function. Eucharist, meditation, circumcision...what an age we live in.
 

Covarr

PS Thanks
May 29, 2009
1,559
0
0
I get the impression that the Vatican has misunderstood the point of this app. I'm sure they will retract their statement if they are informed that it is not meant as a replacement, but a helper, for the examination of conscience portion rather than the confession itself.

P.S. Thanks