Doesn't matter whether it is easier or if it will put Priests out of a job, the outrage stems from the fact that only priests are capable of absolving sins according to the church. A piece of technology doesn't count as a member of the clergy, that is why they're upset about it.Jamous said:Heh, they're just worried it'll put priests out of jobs. On topic, doesn't sound like that bad an idea. I don't believe in this personally; but it'd be much easier to confess online that to a person, I think.
It doesn't matter whether its silly or not, its the way that the Catholics run things. They have every right to say that an Iphone is incapable of absolving sin.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".spartan231490 said:That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.lacktheknack said:That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".spartan231490 said:That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.spartan231490 said:to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.lacktheknack said:That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".spartan231490 said:That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
Well if THAT'S the case, then this article is pointless. Yay.techercat said:Actually, all the app was meant to do to begin with is to help a person prepare for the Sacrament of Confession. It's roughly equivalent to a sheet of paper that outlines an examination of conscience (what sins did I commit, how serious were they, how many times did I commit them) and the process of the sacrament (what Father So-and-so says, what I am supposed to say at which points). The app doesn't celebrate the sacrament in place of a priest any more than a piece of paper with that information would.
It's supposed to be a refresher for people who have been away from confession for a while, and a tool for helping people make better confessions overall.
From the developers' website (http://www.littleiapps.com/overview.php): "Designed to be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent."
So it's not a disapproval from the Vatican, but rather a clarification. What Fr. Lombardi says in no way contradicts what the developers of the app are doing or saying.
Truth is truth, refusal to accept it is idiotic. "Willingly turning aside from the truth is treason to oneself."lacktheknack said:According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.spartan231490 said:to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.lacktheknack said:That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".spartan231490 said:That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
Yea, but you're not the target market for the app. The market is for believers, and believers go with the Vatican.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
Darn anti-theists giving us levelheaded atheists a bad name. It's much like reasonable Catholics being judged based on the few wackos.techercat said:According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.
(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
Well, not equivalent. That's rather overstating things. The last word? Sure. But making a proclamation ex cathedra isn't something they do every day.UnkeptBiscuit said:Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
/amusement. Well that's some fun shorthand for intellectual cowardice. Why critically engage with arguments when we can stick our fingers in our ears and go "LA DA LA DEE LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" ?lacktheknack said:According to the average anti-theist (not an atheist, mind you), all religion should die, so I imagine he'll take less than kindly to that.spartan231490 said:to put it bluntly, if he doesn't believe it,(for that reason) he's an idiot. Just because he doesn't believe in god/the afterlife ect., doesn't mean that others can't, and there is ample evidence in our world that perception is often more powerful than truth.lacktheknack said:That guy admits to being a vocal anti-thiest, don't expect him to buy "they believe in X".spartan231490 said:That's why your not catholic. The fact is, that catholics believe in the rite, and all of it's accompanied rules. Their belief in it, gives the rite power, and they believe in doing it the right way. Truth is irrelevant when it is unknowable, therefore the perception is all that holds power. I now understand the opposition.Cliff_m85 said:Only a true Frangulagilist can dispense Silappuputum upon the erignum of the people. An iPhone cannot do that.Toriver said:That's because in the Catholic Church, a priest has to dispense absolution from your sins and give you a penance in order for it to be a true reconciliation. An iPhone app can't do that. So while this may not actually be meant to take the place of the sacrament of reconciliation, it could confuse many Catholics into thinking it's a valid substitute when it's really not. That's the problem with it.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?
It's a silly rite and practice that does nothing whatsoever. The iPhone does just as much good in my opinion.
(As a Christian, I've learned how to duck and cover from anti-theists. Infuriating, but there's no way to win.)
the whole thing is rather silly when you think about it, can only confess your crimes when your in a lil box to a representative, odds are the vat is worried that they will lose all that phat tithing money that jesus says they arnt supposed to be taking anywaySuilenroc said:i agree with the Vatican on this one. Making confession an app is quite silly. it's a rite of repentance. Making it convenient sorta defeats the whole thing.
Well now that I've read this I fell a bit silly. If this is indeed the case this debate is pointless.techercat said:Actually, all the app was meant to do to begin with is to help a person prepare for the Sacrament of Confession. It's roughly equivalent to a sheet of paper that outlines an examination of conscience (what sins did I commit, how serious were they, how many times did I commit them) and the process of the sacrament (what Father So-and-so says, what I am supposed to say at which points). The app doesn't celebrate the sacrament in place of a priest any more than a piece of paper with that information would.
It's supposed to be a refresher for people who have been away from confession for a while, and a tool for helping people make better confessions overall.
From the developers' website (http://www.littleiapps.com/overview.php): "Designed to be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent."
So it's not a disapproval from the Vatican, but rather a clarification. What Fr. Lombardi says in no way contradicts what the developers of the app are doing or saying.
Well, not every day of course, but they do claim the right to be the only correct interpretation of the Bible, which, since the Bible is the word of God, roughly translates into the ability to state what is basically the word of God. And since Jesus wasn't around for the iPhone, that gives the Vatican the power to give edicts on what the official Church position on something is.Formica Archonis said:Well, not equivalent. That's rather overstating things. The last word? Sure. But making a proclamation ex cathedra isn't something they do every day.UnkeptBiscuit said:Yes, but only if you're Catholic. In the Catholic church, anything the Vatican says is equivalent to the word of God.Natdaprat said:So because the Vatican says it's no replacement, that makes it fact?