It would be awesome for you to continue your own review on them. Considering there seems to be a general consensus that some of the "first cut" videos were not as good as some of the other ones on pages 3 or 4.
Please continue . Let me know if you see mine (2nd one on the 2nd page)Callate said:Continuing thoughts (if you care)
The Midnight Channel: Webcam footage? Seriously? Aside from the lack of audio and visual fidelity inherent to the medium, there's just nothing very interesting here. One of the participants apparently has a degree in the field, and still doesn't contribute any insights.
Q.E.D: There's sort of an interesting visual style to the backgrounds, but none of the actors speaks with an ounce of affect. I recognize that this may have been an intentional choice to emphasize the synthetic nature of the setting, but it was a poor choice, making the rest of the proceedings that much harder to engage.
Blue Sky: Well, that's an interesting way to keep your animation labor down. Not "good", mind you, but interesting. Annnd once again the audio is muffled and hard to make out.
Do It To It: I appreciate the idea of trying to do a "variety skit" format, but even at the relatively short length, many segments still take one mildly funny idea and push it past expiration. The first segment also has the audio problems that plague many pieces, compounded by the attempt at a Nazi accent. Still, some decent costumes, props, and effects, and more professional than many.
Unearthed: "Minecraft" mechinima. Not the worst idea in the world, I guess, but the video spends most of its running time forcing the viewer to stare at dark-on-dark graphics. Minecraft's flat, cartoonish sound effects also clash with the creator's apparently serious tone ambitions, and the spoken audio- almost all exposition- has noise issues.
Pro-Gamer Gauntlet: The actual "traning montage" segments are quite funny, but the framing story is uninteresting. Still, it's all very competently done, and the bits of visual video game reference (start buttons, achievements, etc.) are nicely handled.
More to come, assuming no one screams at me to stop.
No. No Keep them coming. I trust a one line review over a blue ribbon at the moment. (Though that possibly because i'm a tad sour I didn't get one. haha) Would love to hear any feedback you have on Chosen trailer if you've seen it. Haven't had much in the comments yet.Callate said:More to come, assuming no one screams at me to stop.
Thanks for watching and for the feedback. Audio issues I've addressed in this thread and in the Unearthed thread [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/6.242451-The-Escapist-Film-Festival-2010-Unearthed]. Regarding tone, for the pilot episode I wanted to convey what the overall tone of the show would be like (which is quite different from most Escapist content), but it does unfortunately mean that the light humour element of the show didn't get to surface. As a game Minecraft has a lot of elements that are "horror-esque"; I'm not going for horror, but it definitely helps for an "atmospheric" style.Callate said:Unearthed: "Minecraft" mechinima. Not the worst idea in the world, I guess, but the video spends most of its running time forcing the viewer to stare at dark-on-dark graphics. Minecraft's flat, cartoonish sound effects also clash with the creator's apparently serious tone ambitions, and the spoken audio- almost all exposition- has noise issues.
Thanks for the review. We know the editing's a bit jumpy--the original script was 11 pages in official format and the original cut was 8 minutes with the intro and credits. As for the fx, all the explosions are just placed a bit distant, though I think there are some subtle effects that some might notice weren't actually in the shot. I really wish I could've put the intro on the show--that's the best example of the use of the fx. As for resources--not gonna lie, we made the whole thing with 1 $5, and that was just for the one shot. We wanted to do a bit more set wise and would love to show you what we have planned for episode two, I'm just afraid we might never get to. Thanks for the feedback. But that said, what did you think of the concept? Writing? Acting? Cinematography? General Execution?Callate said:To all- I'm glad you appreciate the criticism I've offered so far. It's inevitable that I'm going to step on some toes, but I'm trying not to varnish anything and be honest without being a bastard. And I hope to get to every last one of the entries (someone should!), so bear with me.
Press To Continue: This is all very professional, and the commentary on the various games is informative and entertaining. However, the "guess-o-vision" is completely superfluous.
Twisted Trailers: The seed of an amusing idea here, but I don't think the creator really had enough footage to work with to sell it, and the audio has some unfortunate and clashing overlaps, especially in the last third or so of the video.
Noise: This earns my respect for lampshading its lack of budget without using that as an excuse for poor quality or trying to make what amounts to "we're so lame" jokes. It's genuinely funny (to my sense of humor, at least), well put together, and it's a crying shame that it didn't make it to page one.
Sunder Episode 1: This is the first entry I've seen where I actually want to suggest pulling back on the special effects. The editing is jumpy, sometimes at the expense of the story. It's clearly an ambitious effort, but I don't think the creators quite have the resources to pull it off.
What's the Dillio: Yep. That's about how my entry got put together, too. I don't know where you'd go from there, but as a self-contained film, it's fairly amusing and the animation is nicely done.
Jetman Jam: Ooh. Rendered graphics. Shiny. No, quite seriously, this looks very good. It's a pity most of the humor falls flat.
The Kindly Word: (*sigh*) I'm so sorry. It would actually be kind of cool to have a book review segment on the Escapist to go with the movie reviews and the (multiple) game reviews. And this is never going to be it, because it's just the creator talking into a camera, and however entertaining she may be, that's completely contrary to the flow of just about everything else on The Escapist. It may be that having some sort of animated visual seems thematically inappropriate to the creator for a book review, but y'know what? That's also a good reason for book reviews to be text.
More to come, probably tomorrow.
Glad you found most of it entertaining.. the "guess-o-vision", while it's the part I'm least happy with too, it is also a content vector while giving people some time to think about the answer (or hit up google ) - be it holiday themeing or even some hints if it's a particularly obscure one.Callate said:To all- I'm glad you appreciate the criticism I've offered so far. It's inevitable that I'm going to step on some toes, but I'm trying not to varnish anything and be honest without being a bastard. And I hope to get to every last one of the entries (someone should!), so bear with me.
Press To Continue: This is all very professional, and the commentary on the various games is informative and entertaining. However, the "guess-o-vision" is completely superfluous.
Thanks, we tried to make sure we could show off what we could do since we only have one shot.Artorius said:Carmen 1.0 - good premise acting and implementation was good though the postman was bit off