Negative energy is more accurately descibed as negative mass-energy, because mass and energy are one and the same in different forms. Now, negative mass has a reverse-gravitational effect; that is, it pushes matter away. Should you use suficient quantities of both normal matter-energy and negative matter-energy, then you could theoretically warp an existing black hole in such a way as to make it possible to fly through without being crushed. And lo, the wormhole is born.thiosk said:Negative energy has always bothered me. The concept arises from a symmetric mathematical equation. However, no one has ever been able to adequately explain (to me, perhaps what goes on down the hall in the theoretical physics office is much more concrete) what negative energy is, or how to generate it.
"Wormholes are totally possible! All you need to do is pump in enough negative energy..."
No, the wave is in front of you. When you stop, it keeps going. Imagine if you hit someone with your car and then stopped. He wouldn't come through the windshield, he'd go flying forward.canadamus_prime said:Well the article made it sound as if all that debris was being collected by the bubble since they used the analogy of an ocean wave, so naturally I thought all that built up stuff would hit the ship when you tried to stop.Megacherv said:No, the debris is built up at the front of the shipcanadamus_prime said:Actually since this negative energy bubble is being generated behind your ship, wouldn't the first thing all those accumulated particles slam into when you stopped be your ship?
The first person I thought of was Larry Niven, who applied it to fusion drives.castlewise said:I think some physicist said that any engine technology which could be used for interstellar travel outputs enough energy to be made into a weapon of mass destruction.
Beat me to it. Both physicists and science fiction writers have already explored in great detail the military side effects of propulsion systems that allow for either travel at significant fractions of the speed of light or FTL. All you really have to do is strap one of those things to a decent-sized rock and point it at a planet you don't like, and it might as well not exist anymore after the amount of damage done to it.Slycne said:Even putting aside particles for the moment, the simple ability to project a mass at even approaching the speed of light makes for an incredibly powerful weapon. Nuclear weapons would be relics compared to the amount of force you could hit a planet with accelerating any decently sized object to the upper % of the speed of light.
But that's just the standard course of things! Hell, if we hadn't made beer by accident, we'd still be trying to make water explode.Zen Toombs said:
I'm pretty sure the article said that the bubble would be generated behind the ship, but whatever. It's all just theory anyway.Daaaah Whoosh said:No, the wave is in front of you. When you stop, it keeps going. Imagine if you hit someone with your car and then stopped. He wouldn't come through the windshield, he'd go flying forward.canadamus_prime said:Well the article made it sound as if all that debris was being collected by the bubble since they used the analogy of an ocean wave, so naturally I thought all that built up stuff would hit the ship when you tried to stop.Megacherv said:No, the debris is built up at the front of the shipcanadamus_prime said:Actually since this negative energy bubble is being generated behind your ship, wouldn't the first thing all those accumulated particles slam into when you stopped be your ship?
that is not very efective. asi t only travels within solar system. the rest of travel id done via gates, which work on pretty much teleportation priciples. it took hundreds of years to mvoe gates to the next solar system in eve universe. it wont be working any time soon.TestECull said:I vote we try to use EvE Online's method. New Eden's warp drives simply create a vacuum bubble around a ship, which enables the normal sublight engines to propel you at FTL speeds effortlessly due to not having to fight the resistance of those very particles.
Indeed... I confused energy and force during writing, sorry about that.Wicky_42 said:I think you meant exponentially... *science fail*Thaliur said:This must be the most useless FTL drive I ever heard of. When approaching the speed of light, the mass of your ship (the actual inert mass) approaches infinite values, which require linearly scaled (thus, in the end, infinite) energy for acceleration. The Laws of relativistic physics don't care about friction.TestECull said:snip.![]()
I had a look at the entry, but no, they're driven by "sustainer engines", which use reactants and leave plasma exhaust. They are capable of being fired during warp and are shielded (which can alloy them to match frequencies and penetrate shields), but they come no-where near light speed. Then again, when you're an anti-matter bomb there's some that might say light speed is over-rated.Thaliur said:About those Warp-drive missiles you mentioned, wouldn't that be mostly how photon torpedoes work? At least that's how I always imagined them, besides being antimetter bombs, of course. Acording to the Memory alpha wiki, they are warp-capable.
What? No no no, inertial dampeners are there to stop you getting crushed into paste as soon as you enter warp.albino boo said:Not to seam like Sheldon here but thats why the have inertial dampers.
Loop Stricken said:What? No no no, inertial dampeners are there to stop you getting crushed into paste as soon as you enter warp.albino boo said:Not to seam like Sheldon here but thats why the have inertial dampers.