WarZ Removed From Steam

[xDarc]

However, you ALSO know that War Z used false advertising, horrifically anti-consumer design decisions and released a NON FUNCTIONING PRODUCT AS A PURCHASEABLE PRODUCT WITH NO INDICATION THAT IT'S UNFINISHED.

That is not a fact, that is your opinion. It will become a fact when a court of law decides it is a fact. False advertising is a subjective claim. Most companies do not do anything without a court order, or fear of a court order.

When have you ever heard of somebody suing a game maker for false advertising because the map wasn't as big as they said? It's just DayZ community trolling away, doing what they do best. Meanwhile DayZ gets to operate in a legal gray area because it's just a mod and not the actual game for sale, but everyone knows that all those ARMA sales are DayZ players.

It's comically hypocritical that Valve only gives a shit when they think it could come back on them, but they'll gladly take your money when they are certain you have no legal recourse.

 

[maturin]

You're repeating yourself. Day Z gives no grounds for refunds, much less legal complaints. There is no legal grey area, just blinding white. If all those people bought ArmA 2 to use as toilet paper and christmas presents for terrorists, it wouldn't make a whit of difference.

In this case, the false advertising is as simple as numbers. 'Subjective!' Why post such trash?

Whether it's enforceable under the law is a question for courts. But it is blatantly dishonest and exploitative by even the dismal standards of the videogame market, everyone is calling them out on it, and people are refreshed to see a company on their side for once, having the same standards of consumer service.

 

[lacktheknack]

However, you ALSO know that War Z used false advertising, horrifically anti-consumer design decisions and released a NON FUNCTIONING PRODUCT AS A PURCHASEABLE PRODUCT WITH NO INDICATION THAT IT'S UNFINISHED.

That is not a fact, that is your opinion. It will become a fact when a court of law decides it is a fact. False advertising is a subjective claim. Most companies do not do anything without a court order, or fear of a court order.

When have you ever heard of somebody suing a game maker for false advertising because the map wasn't as big as they said? It's just DayZ community trolling away, doing what they do best. Meanwhile DayZ gets to operate in a legal gray area because it's just a mod and not the actual game for sale, but everyone knows that all those ARMA sales are DayZ players.

It's comically hypocritical that Valve only gives a shit when they think it could come back on them, but they'll gladly take your money when they are certain you have no legal recourse.

You can observe in dozens of videos that the game is fundamentally broken, as well as receive confirmation from everyone (including the developers) that servers cap at 50 players (in contrast with "up to 100 players").

There's no way to spin this as anything other than false advertising and premature release, courts be damned.

It's "not fact" because a jury hasn't declared it so? And somehow I'M the unthinking sheep (you've implied this, don't deny it, you've lumped me in with the "trolling DayZ community" that I've never even interacted with) because I don't immediately hate Valve for doing something right? I thought the POINT of being free-thinking was not having everything defined for you, but being able to call them as you see them.

And it's not even REMOTELY hypocritical that they won't refund you for ArmA2, a FUNCTIONING GAME with correct advertising. Good God, man, take off the hate blinders and SEE.

You'd make a better case saying "the players of War Z shouldn't expect refunds, because they were gullible enough to buy a game from Sergey Titov, the head of Big fecking Rigs: Over The Road Racing".

 

[xDarc]

You're repeating yourself. Day Z gives no grounds for refunds, much less legal complaints.

In this case, the false advertising is as simple as numbers. 'Subjective!' Why post such trash?

Yes, DayZ gives no grounds for refunds, except it is made by a guy who works for the company that makes ARMA, and we all know that he is getting paid. Hiding behind a mod to make money. That's trash.

On the other hand, someone else tries to throw their hat in the ring and the DayZ community is harassing Valve from the get go to get it pulled because the map size isn't what they said.

You can sit here and tell me all day long about the distinctions between the mod, between the product, that the game isn't what they said it was- but that's not up to you or valve, that's up to a judge and lawyers. I don't really care who said what until there is court decision.

Point is this- this is nothing but a series of dick moves on the part of the DayZ community and Valve. Don't really see any winners here, just a lot of whining all around. This is probably the most I've ever had people jump up my ass in one thread to make a very simple point.

 

[Vizanto]

Well because your point was off-base and wrong. Since you seemed to be conflating this refund with an issue of quality as opposed to false advertising, which War Z clearly did and that Valve ignored until now. Plus, it's not just the Valve and Day Z community the but fucking War Z community itself! People felt ripped the fuck off because they were promised a very clear set of features that did not even exist, to which the developer could only answer "Well you might have just imagined all that shit we clearly stated in our Steam summary."

And again, Day Z didn't make any fucking promises to the consumer, it was a mod to an established game and people bought Arma 2 for the simple matter of word of mouth on Dayz, big. fucking. difference. Big fucking difference from a game that says it's gonna be this and then blatantly isn't. It'd be like is Bethseda promised that Skyrim would be twice as big as the Oblivion world but on Day 1 only made it about the size of Whiterun and said that the bigger world would come later and that people read too much into "It'll be twice as big as Oblivion."

In short, you made a bad point, and your ass was rightly jumped up.

 

[nexus]

Yeah, Valve really needs to actually look at games before they release them on Steam.

Not necessarily.

Best thing to do is just let things roll, because people can like just about anything. If it's completely and utterly unplayable, then sure.. but otherwise.. If they were that authoritarian about it, they might let stuff like "Day Z" hit the wall because it's "not finished", or even Minecraft. If you get my drift.

It's hard to know what people will like. There could have been a strange cult following for War Z, but there wasn't.. and people complained, so down comes the hammer.

 

[lacktheknack]

You're repeating yourself. Day Z gives no grounds for refunds, much less legal complaints.

In this case, the false advertising is as simple as numbers. 'Subjective!' Why post such trash?

Yes, DayZ gives no grounds for refunds, except it is made by a guy who works for the company that makes ARMA, and we all know that he is getting paid. Hiding behind a mod to make money. That's trash.

On the other hand, someone else tries to throw their hat in the ring and the DayZ community is harassing Valve from the get go to get it pulled because the map size isn't what they said.

You can sit here and tell me all day long about the distinctions between the mod, between the product, that the game isn't what they said it was- but that's not up to you or valve, that's up to a judge and lawyers. I don't really care who said what until there is court decision.

Point is this- this is nothing but a series of dick moves on the part of the DayZ community and Valve. Don't really see any winners here, just a lot of whining all around. This is probably the most I've ever had people jump up my ass in one thread to make a very simple point.

It's because you whinge about how it's all Valve's fault one second, and tell us you "don't care" and that it's in the court's hands the next, all while refusing to acknowledge simple facts in the process.

You're not making a simple point, you're just making no point at all. You're being antagonistic and contrarion, and we can't see a reason for it other than "because I can".

 

[GamingAwesome1]

So prove it and court and sue them. It's pretty clear that Valve only acted to protect itself and nothing more. They didn't have to do anything about it. It's not their responsibility to verify the publisher's claims.

I'm going to stop you there.

Yes, it is absolutely the vendor's responsibility to ensure that unfinished games and dishonest under-handed business practices are not sold on their service. You can't seriously be suggesting they're absolved of all responsibility, right?

If a physical retailer sold you a broken product which you bought because the manufacturer had lied about its features, the physical retailer is pretty obviously at some sort of obligation to take some responsibility when people start complaining.

Valve absolutely should verify the publisher's claims before they start putting games on the service, the alternative is that Valve just goes "Lol nope, not our problem" when a publisher pulls something that's basically false advertising.

 

[hazabaza1]

Yeah, Valve really needs to actually look at games before they release them on Steam.

Not necessarily.

Best thing to do is just let things roll, because people can like just about anything. If it's completely and utterly unplayable, then sure.. but otherwise.. If they were that authoritarian about it, they might let stuff like "Day Z" hit the wall because it's "not finished", or even Minecraft. If you get my drift.

It's hard to know what people will like. There could have been a strange cult following for War Z, but there wasn't.. and people complained, so down comes the hammer.

But DayZ wasn't released on Steam.

And if they're not checking and denying stuff, they should at least find out if a game is in any sort of pre-release stage and specify accordingly.

 

[The Lunatic]

For what it's worth, you have to pay to get on Steam.

So, yes, I can see why Steam wouldn't be desperate to prolong the approval process.

However, them doing this is essentially saying "No, we don't want your money for this product".

Which, is actually really impressive, and if anything, I'd probably say it's almost a negative.

After all, who is Steam to tell me what I'm allowed to spend my money upon frivolously.

Perhaps there's more to this however.

I suppose, giving Steam was being looked at to take responsibility for it, and not those spending the money on a game they haven't looked into, it's the easiest option to just appease the people and avoid bad press.

 

[nexus]

And if they're not checking and denying stuff, they should at least find out if a game is in any sort of pre-release stage and specify accordingly.

I know, I'm just citing examples of what could theoretically get shitcanned were it to be "greenlit" on Steam. Sometimes a flash cult fanbase wraps an iron curtain around an otherwise awful game, and it progresses into something decent and gains popularity. Other times, well..

I think the way Valve does things is probably spot on.

 

[bafrali]

Valve has not only enforced quality control, but a refund agreement as well?

Valve received 50 Light Side Points

Let's see where they are now...

Light Side: 1050
Dark Side:8220

Okay, so they're getting there. Baby steps.

even though I love how you treat valve as darksided, what gave them so many ds and so few ls if you don't mine me asking?

That said I will take any excuse to hate on valve, if for no other than than there overrated and they worse fans of any game developer, yes worse than bioware, I hate valvies that much.

Though I have only played portal 2 and TF 2, I can say their games are good, but there just that; good, not much else to say.

Any before anyone asks why I hate valvies, lets just say they rub me the wrong way, often, and in a bad manner.

Don't you know. Every one has heard the story of Bhalspawn whose parents was shot by Gabe Newell in the dark. Then He became THE PLUMBERMAN. Protector of the innocent pipes who are opressed by the corrupt Valve.

OT: People are seriously making up conspiracy theories about this refund? HAHA funny guys

 

[xDarc]

So prove it and court and sue them. It's pretty clear that Valve only acted to protect itself and nothing more. They didn't have to do anything about it. It's not their responsibility to verify the publisher's claims.

I'm going to stop you there.

Yes, it is absolutely the vendor's responsibility to ensure that unfinished games and dishonest under-handed business practices are not sold on their service. You can't seriously be suggesting they're absolved of all responsibility, right?

If a physical retailer sold you a broken product which you bought because the manufacturer had lied about its features, the physical retailer is pretty obviously at some sort of obligation to take some responsibility when people start complaining.

Except legally, it's really not their responsibility. It's not Wal-Mart's responsibility to check for lead paint in toys they sell, it's not Best Buy's responsibility to make sure every DVD box actually has a DVD in it, etc. The vendor is let off the hook time and again. Ultimately it is the consumer's responsibility to take issue with the manufacturer, or pursue legal means when that fails. This isn't any different for video games.

 

[xDarc]

its no different from the other hundreds of other mods released for arma 2 except its well known.

What DayZ? DayZ is made by a guy who works for the company that makes ARMA. The difference between the guy who makes DayZ and the guys who make all those other mods, is that this guy is getting paid. How this is just allowed to function in a gray space and everyone is OK with that is beyond me.

If I were the guys releasing WarZ, I would have just released an old game and offered the real game as a free optional mod. Or even just offer the launcher as full-priced game. Boom, you are now absolved of any responsibility ala Bohemia. Afterall, it's OK when they do it.

 

[AlotFirst]

You know what, I don't actually feel like argueing with anyone on why removing possibly to buy the WarZ from Steam is a good decision. The evidence is out there and justice has been served.

 

[Comocat]

...

Except legally, it's really not their responsibility. It's not Wal-Mart's responsibility to check for lead paint in toys they sell, it's not Best Buy's responsibility to make sure every DVD box actually has a DVD in it, etc. The vendor is let off the hook time and again. Ultimately it is the consumer's responsibility to take issue with the manufacturer, or pursue legal means when that fails. This isn't any different for video games.

It may not be their responsibility, but how many DVDs would you buy from Bestbuy if you kept getting empty boxes? In the past two weeks Valve has let some pretty high profile stinkers through their system. I was interested in Towns, and tried the demo only to find its an unfinished mess. Now, WarZ, a genre I'm pretty excited about, shows up on steam out of the blue, and with claims that are dubious at best. Valve certainly doesnt make money making games, so if their service cant be relied on for buying games, what does that leave them? Most of my purchases on steam are impulse sale buys, but now I have to wonder about some of the titles showing up.

I think this also hurts the genre as a whole. Video game makers are notorious for over promising and under-performing. I have not personally bought a MMO since Warhammer and will certainly never pay $60 upfront for an IP I know nothing about. The video game industry thrives off deceiving their customers about the content of their purchases and in my case, its costing them revenue. I wont pirate games, but I certainly wont buy them.

 

[cookyt]

Yes, DayZ gives no grounds for refunds, except it is made by a guy who works for the company that makes ARMA, and we all know that he is getting paid. Hiding behind a mod to make money. That's trash.

You want a refund for DayZ? Reach into your pocket and pull out zero dollars. That is what you spent on acquiring DayZ: the Alpha version of a mod with no warranty. I doubt, however that's what you want. What you really want is a refund for ARMA 2, the game you actually paid for. Making the assertion that the two are the same is a slap in the face of the ARMA 2 developers. They worked hard to bring you a game, and you are ignoring that game to play a mod they have no control over. You wouldn't ask Microsoft to refund you the purchase of Windows because you don't like Google Chrome, so why would you ask the ARMA 2 developers to refund you because you don't like DayZ?

As for your comparison with War Z: Is there anything about ARMA 2's marketing that misled you into thinking the (core) game was anything other than what you got? If not; if the ARMA 2 you paid for is the ARMA 2 you expected to get, then there is no comparison between the situation of the people who purchased War Z and your predicament. You paid for a war-based shooter; you got a war-based shooter. They paid for a zombie survival game; they got an unfinished mess.

As to your assertion that the DayZ developers are in cahoots with the ARMA 2 developers to make more money, you are missing two facts. DayZ is free, and its developers are not being given funds from the ARMA 2 developers for its continued development. Two it is the point of a mod to extend the lifetime of the game and make it more appealing. This is why the modding tools exist in the first place. Yes, a developer from ARMA 2 also made DayZ, but he made it on his own time, and the time he spends on DayZ is time unpaid. Besides, wouldn't you expect that one of he most popular mods to the game would be developed by one of the people who are most familiar with how its engine works?

 

[m19]

Valve offered to give your money back. Not sure why so much whining over their involvement.

 

[xefaros]

its no different from the other hundreds of other mods released for arma 2 except its well known.

What DayZ? DayZ is made by a guy who works for the company that makes ARMA. The difference between the guy who makes DayZ and the guys who make all those other mods, is that this guy is getting paid. How this is just allowed to function in a gray space and everyone is OK with that is beyond me.

If I were the guys releasing WarZ, I would have just released an old game and offered the real game as a free optional mod. Or even just offer the launcher as full-priced game. Boom, you are now absolved of any responsibility ala Bohemia. Afterall, it's OK when they do it.

Actually they did released an old game as a new product and put a price tag on it.That game was War inc.The fashion they did it was dodgy.Also one is optional(DayZ) other is advertised as a full product at least the first 24 hours.Steam didnt have to take it down after the description was changed but if u didnt follow the story you wouldnt know about mods deleting negative comments to score some cash,unplayability,misinformation etc etc
( http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/152u0c/just_when_you_thought_it_couldnt_get_any_worse/ )
BTW microtransactions were planned ( http://kotaku.com/5942114/would-you-pay-for-an-in+game-item-you-lose-when-you-die?tag=The-War-Z )

But please continue your fetish and attack Dayz

Its somewhat similar to Skyrim DLCs they see the mods community(or Bethesda) made pack some story on it and release it as a dlc but at least they doing it properly

 

[MrPhyntch]

So prove it and court and sue them. It's pretty clear that Valve only acted to protect itself and nothing more. They didn't have to do anything about it. It's not their responsibility to verify the publisher's claims.

I'm going to stop you there.

Yes, it is absolutely the vendor's responsibility to ensure that unfinished games and dishonest under-handed business practices are not sold on their service. You can't seriously be suggesting they're absolved of all responsibility, right?

If a physical retailer sold you a broken product which you bought because the manufacturer had lied about its features, the physical retailer is pretty obviously at some sort of obligation to take some responsibility when people start complaining.

Except legally, it's really not their responsibility. It's not Wal-Mart's responsibility to check for lead paint in toys they sell, it's not Best Buy's responsibility to make sure every DVD box actually has a DVD in it, etc. The vendor is let off the hook time and again. Ultimately it is the consumer's responsibility to take issue with the manufacturer, or pursue legal means when that fails. This isn't any different for video games.

Do you understand what you just did? You just contradicted your own argument. You've been saying that Valve has just been doing this to protect their own interests, so that they can't get sued and whatnot. But now you just admitted that Steam is incapable for getting sued for this. Sure, Steam wants to make sure they have consumer confidence, but if they can't get sued over this, this is partly a gesture of goodwill. And goodwill usually requires the consumer to compliment them on it.

Seriously, some people. When valve does something bad, they're the devil. When they do something good, they're still the devil and now they're hiding something.