There's really not enough here to pass any kind of judgement to be honest guys. Combine that with the frankly awful sound quality of the YouTube video and I'm not sure that there's really anything that can be said.
Watch Leaked Amazing Spiderman Clips
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Middle one was alright. The audio was wonky so I couldn't get a good grasp on his delivery, so we'll see for certain later.
Well Jesus Christ guys, most of you guys sound determined to hate the movie, and came in looking at the clips from that perspective.
Realize this is less than two minutes worth of clips, so please, calm your balls.
Realize this is less than two minutes worth of clips, so please, calm your balls.
That footage looks like its months old and the edits don't seemed finished.
They don't have to reinvent the wheel for the amazing spider-man movie. I just hope for some surprises.
They don't have to reinvent the wheel for the amazing spider-man movie. I just hope for some surprises.
I didn't know we had started basing our entire opinion of movies less than 2 minutes of footage with poor sound quality, but hey there you go.
As for the "questions" raised by the first clip - haven't you ever fallen asleep on public transport before? Or find yourself waking with a jump for whatever reason? It's really not that outlandish a scene if you think about it.
But yeh, I also liked Spiderman 3, despite the fact I had heard so much bad press about it I went in expecting a complete travesty.
As for the "questions" raised by the first clip - haven't you ever fallen asleep on public transport before? Or find yourself waking with a jump for whatever reason? It's really not that outlandish a scene if you think about it.
But yeh, I also liked Spiderman 3, despite the fact I had heard so much bad press about it I went in expecting a complete travesty.
Terrible sound, with potentially multiple takes strung together (for the middle scene when he's stringing the guy up), and highly unlikely to be the final edit.
So yeah, no shit it doesn't look great.
Acting in the actual trailers seems fine. And yes, those are obviously highlights strung together in short succession, but then this leak is hardly representative either.
We may as well be sitting around and complaining that clips of characters being animated for a game makes the final product out to be a little shitty, because there's no textures or music, and all the voice work is filler, and some of the animations don't look real yet.
So yeah, no shit it doesn't look great.
Acting in the actual trailers seems fine. And yes, those are obviously highlights strung together in short succession, but then this leak is hardly representative either.
We may as well be sitting around and complaining that clips of characters being animated for a game makes the final product out to be a little shitty, because there's no textures or music, and all the voice work is filler, and some of the animations don't look real yet.
Well MacGuire's was (and I believe this is the scientific term) a massive pussy, so that's not exactly difficult or surprising.Nooners said:
Something about just how easily that bathroom fell apart didn't make it look like super strength at all but just bad luck in a very poorly constructed bathroom. At least TRY and make it look like there's some extra force there....
That's the impression I got too.Cheery Lunatic said:
Mind you, I can't friggin' stand the 'original' trilogy and I'm actually really looking forward to this so maybe that's why I liked these clips. Saw absoloutely nothing wrong with them.
Some people just seem to be scraping the bottom of the barrel for reasons to dislike these clips.
'Spider-Man wouldn't do that to a criminal' - What comics have YOU been reading?
'His stance is wrong' - Fucking what??
And if I may quote wikipedia regarding the cancelled Spider-Man 4:
"Raimi also discussed his desire to upgrade Bruce Campbell from a cameo appearance to a significant role. It was reported in December 2009 that John Malkovich was in negotiations to play Vulture and that Anne Hathaway would play Felicia Hardy, though she would not have transformed into the Black Cat as in the comics. Instead, Raimi's Felicia was expected to become a new superpowered figure called the Vulturess"
Fuck. Sam. Raimi.
Robert Ewing said:
Also the rights to spider-man were about to go back to Marvel and Sony were afraid that:Hammeroj said:
A: They would do a better job, and looking at their movies so far they probebly would do
B: They were afraid that Marvel would put him in The Avengers and make it an even bigger hit than it already will be.
You shall now be savagely beaten for mentioning the movie that shall never be named again! I will, however, give you the choice of a baseball bat or a sledgehammer.ProtoChimp said:
In related Ryan Reynolds news, I hope he does a better job with Deadpool than he did GL or I will be paying him a visit to perform another of the above mentioned savage beatings.
I may be one of the few people who didn't like Raimi's Spider-Man. He was soul less. Never joked, never had any banter. Just give Spidey back to Marvel please.
Yay, it still looks like shit. I dont have to be as bothered when people tell me Im wrong for being mostly content with the third spiderman film
I am clearly the only person in the world that is looking forward to this film. Big fan of Andrew Garfield and Marc Webb directed 500 Days of Summer, which is quite possibly my favourite film... ever. Plus, the casting is fantastic. Rhys Ifans is an odd yet fantastic choice for the Lizard, Emma Stone has been in consistently good films since Easy A, and the supporting cast is just... my God. Martin Sheen as Uncle Ben? A medal for whoever made that casting choice. Sally Field as Aunt May? I literally can't think of another actress who is more suited to the role. And Dennis Leary as George Stacy? I'm pretty sure only Nathan Fillion tops him as a better casting choice.
Plus, they're basically giving the fans what they want at this point. Mechanical web-shooters? Check. A one-villain movie with a fan favourite antagonist? Check. Gwen-fucking-Stacy? Check.
Fuck the haters, I'm looking forward to it.
Plus, they're basically giving the fans what they want at this point. Mechanical web-shooters? Check. A one-villain movie with a fan favourite antagonist? Check. Gwen-fucking-Stacy? Check.
Fuck the haters, I'm looking forward to it.
Firstly, I'm going to get a little pedantic here: remake and reboot? Not the same thing. Secondly, I think it's a bit of a stretch to say Marc Webb is stealing anything. I mean, two scenes are similar so Webb is suddenly some scene-stealing villain? I doubt Webb is brazen or stupid enough to steal a scene from the original and figure nobody would care.Greg Tito said:
I don't know, I think instead of remaking a movie, they should have remade a musical. Or a comic series.
Seriously, I don't see how we can get very much from a new Spider-man origin story. In my mind, that's always the worst part: having to meet all the characters and waiting for them to meet each other, and then waiting for something to go wrong. Just cut to the chase already.
Seriously, I don't see how we can get very much from a new Spider-man origin story. In my mind, that's always the worst part: having to meet all the characters and waiting for them to meet each other, and then waiting for something to go wrong. Just cut to the chase already.
I cant stand haters and I cant stand trolls always looking for a reason to hate snd it seems every single last one of you (almoost) are all hating and saying crap, everything about those clips were great and you really need to get your heads out of your butts( yeah give it to marvel see Ultimate Spider-man tv series) I cant wait for this movie
Green Lantern, be happy.
You are no longer the latest, worst adaptation of a comic book character.
You are no longer the latest, worst adaptation of a comic book character.
Actually, such a scene doesn't exist in the first Raimi film (practicing using his webs is not even conceptually the same thing) so I think maybe Tito is just inventing stuff in his head again.
And to whomever said The Incredible Hulk (2008) was about the genesis of the Hulk: what the hell are you smoking? Can people at least try to be factually accurate when making their arguments?
And to whomever said The Incredible Hulk (2008) was about the genesis of the Hulk: what the hell are you smoking? Can people at least try to be factually accurate when making their arguments?