Green Lantern, be happy.
You are no longer the latest, worst adaptation of a comic book character.
You are no longer the latest, worst adaptation of a comic book character.
Haters are going to hate?Caffeine_Bombed said:That's the impression I got too.Cheery Lunatic said:Well Jesus Christ guys, most of you guys sound determined to hate the movie, and came in looking at the clips from that perspective.
Realize this is less than two minutes worth of clips, so please, calm your balls.
Mind you, I can't friggin' stand the 'original' trilogy and I'm actually really looking forward to this so maybe that's why I liked these clips. Saw absoloutely nothing wrong with them.
Some people just seem to be scraping the bottom of the barrel for reasons to dislike these clips.
'Spider-Man wouldn't do that to a criminal' - What comics have YOU been reading?
'His stance is wrong' - Fucking what??
And if I may quote wikipedia regarding the cancelled Spider-Man 4:
"Raimi also discussed his desire to upgrade Bruce Campbell from a cameo appearance to a significant role. It was reported in December 2009 that John Malkovich was in negotiations to play Vulture and that Anne Hathaway would play Felicia Hardy, though she would not have transformed into the Black Cat as in the comics. Instead, Raimi's Felicia was expected to become a new superpowered figure called the Vulturess"
Fuck. Sam. Raimi.
I think it's more about Spider-Man's character. If you watch ANY of the cartoons, Spider-Man is a sarcastic, light-hearted, and funny super-hero. He had his moments of depression and guilt, but which superheroes don't? Sam Raimi's Spider-Man upped the depressing nature to ridiculous levels, culminating in that stupid dance sequence in the third movie.Abandon4093 said:I personally don't think spiderman is ever going to be transferred to film very well. Because people are hung up on using a real person to play him, but in the comics everything about spiderman, his posture, the way he walks, crawls, jumps, perches on fences and poles etc.
It's very inhuman.
Audacity said:That was with Webs. Also if you're gonna do that I can off hand mention several movies that do the same thing.
Wolverine Origins (cutting the sink and radiator up with his claws), X-Men Last Stand (Banshee trying to fly using his voice), Superman Returns (young Clark Sequence learning to fly falling through the barn roof), The Incredibles (Robert Parr slips on his skateboard to bend the car frame), X-Men 1 (rogue, not so much fooling around with powers, puts her boyfriend in a coma), Captain America (Running so fast he falls through the window), Iron Man 1 (The Fly tests and blaster tests), Kung Fu Panda (when Po first starts fighting Tia Lung and is getting used to being the Dragon Warrior)
It's old and done by many others.
Ok, good to see some people addressed this. I feel it's very unfair of the writer to accuse a "getting used to powers scene" of absolutely being a direct copy of a similar scene. Never mind that when adapting a comic book, MANY things are going to be similar.Sparrow said:Firstly, I'm going to get a little pedantic here: remake and reboot? Not the same thing. Secondly, I think it's a bit of a stretch to say Marc Webb is stealing anything. I mean, two scenes are similar so Webb is suddenly some scene-stealing villain? I doubt Webb is brazen or stupid enough to steal a scene from the original and figure nobody would care.
Sparrow" post="7.362199.14214049 said:I am clearly the only person in the world that is looking forward to this film.
You're not. I'm one of the few that doesn't like the Raimi movies at all.
I grew up on the Ultimate Spider Man comics and this looks to be a lot like them, which I like.
Also guys, don't call a movie shit based on two minutes of poorly edited clips with shitty sound quality. Please.
I agree. It's why I love Spiderman. He's such a trollThomas Guy said:I may be one of the few people who didn't like Raimi's Spider-Man. He was soul less. Never joked, never had any banter. Just give Spidey back to Marvel please.
I don't get this you must wait 22.3 years before you could make a remake of something, especially when that something is coming from comics a medium know for running multiple continuities at once just because they wanted to try something different with the character. Not saying I expect the movie to be good but judging because it didn't allow some senseless made up counter to run down before getting made is just silly.Robert Ewing said:This is like that parplexing hulk remake, that went into production the SAME YEAR as the release of the OTHER hulk movie, and were both ABOUT the genesis of the Hulk. So it was essentially the same movie, released twice, but with a different subplot. It was so weird...
This is a needless remake! Raimi's movies were completely and utterly demonstrably fine! Sure the third one tripped at the last hurdle. But it's too soon!
A remake in 20 or 30 years I can understand, but why now!?