There are double-headed glaives and guan dao, which no one uses in real combat, and are really just for show. Also, those glaives have much larger pole sections in the center, which as I mentioned are necessary for them to be wielded properly. All polearm styles from Europe to China and Japan -every last one- uses the entire shaft as necessary for striking and preventing strikes against the hands. Also, they all make use of the leverage of the shaft against the body, either to start striking rotation quickly or to stop it. There are some non-bladed staff Tae Kwon Do styles that use tapered, rotational staves, but again these are for demonstration, practice, and competitive purposes only.ecoho said:ok first off there are double bladed staves in the real world and they have their own unique fighting style as to not hurt themselves I would assume that duel sabers have a similar style.
next the new saber has a lightsaber cross guard which one could see as useful if the hilt has a good grip as it allows you to counter an opponents blade stroke and allow you to strike in one move.(see medieval sword fighting to see how this is done.) btw if your touching the cross guard and not attacking with the hilt when you do it your doing it wrong![]()
Yes. Why can't we leave this one out for at least a couple more movies? Variety is the spice of life. (Hopefully I didn't just doom us to a Abrams re-imagining of Dune.)Hawki said:So, thoughts...
-Tatoonine...God damnit, we're back on Tatooine. That dirtball's appeared in 5 out of 6 films already and...gah!
Well, that kind of makes sense. The F/A-18 Hornet, and tons of other military planes, has been in service for over 30 years and probably won't be replaced for decades on most militaries it serves. After a 30 year rebellion and the costs that come with one, it's plausible that someone would still have several squadron's worth of X-wings in use, especially in a universe were technological advancement has reached a snail's pace. Or, it could just be Abrams riding the nostalgia train, again.-X-Wings...30 plus years and we're still using X-Wings. I mean, yeah, X-Wings are cool and all, but...ugh.
Hairless Mammoth said:Yes. Why can't we leave this one out for at least a couple more movies? Variety is the spice of life. (Hopefully I didn't just doom us to a Abrams re-imagining of Dune.)Hawki said:So, thoughts...
-Tatoonine...God damnit, we're back on Tatooine. That dirtball's appeared in 5 out of 6 films already and...gah!
Well, that kind of makes sense. The F/A-18 Hornet, and tons of other military planes, has been in service for over 30 years and probably won't be replaced for decades on most militaries it serves. After a 30 year rebellion and the costs that come with one, it's plausible that someone would still have several squadron's worth of X-wings in use, especially in a universe were technological advancement has reached a snail's pace. Or, it could just be Abrams riding the nostalgia train, again.-X-Wings...30 plus years and we're still using X-Wings. I mean, yeah, X-Wings are cool and all, but...ugh.
OT:Oh great. Another teaser that manages to use footage that might be in the final film but doesn't really give one hint to the plot (as teasers are wont to do.) I won't say this will be the worst Star Wars (yet), but I say that it's being directed by the guy who's directorial film career has been nothing but nostalgia riding.
I think I'll close with a song set to the main theme: "Go-ing, this is so go-ing, to ba-ba-ba-blow. J-J Abrams really loves his Nostalg-i-a."
Presumably. I mean, for all we know the explanation could be that they are encapsulated by the same "energy" that allows the saber to project and contain the light blade, thus making them able to repel another light-saber blade.Ark of the Covetor said:They're consistent in one respect; they cut through anything except another lightsaber blade. The energy quillions have physical projectors which extend from the handle, which would be cut through if you made any attempt to trap an opponent's blade;
Why would you need to? The point would be to catch or deflect an opponents blade, should that blade slide down towards the wielder's hands.you can't grasp the lightsaber blade and wield the sword in a wide two-handed stance using the quillions as a weapon as medieval swordsmen sometimes did.
Which is the very essence of a sword made entirely out of "several-hundred-million-degree-light" that can cut through anything; that also conveniently comes in a rainbow's variety of colors.They're pointless ornamentation that do nothing except make the weapon more dangerous to the user than it already was,
which as I said is exactly the kind of flash-first, logic-never aesthetic that Abrams loves.
I never implied you "threw a hissy fit" over Maul's saber. My point was, this new saber would be far less unwieldy and dangerous to the user than Maul's dual-blade saber. As such, with so many fans being fine with Maul's but frowning upon this new one, it just seemed inconsistent to me.And I obviously can't speak to other people, but if you'll note above I don't, and at the time I didn't, throw a hissy over Maul's saberstaff - I thought it was a bit OTT, but it worked in the world. My reasoning is unchanged and consistent, and it is not diminished by the fact some other person's at some other time was not, so take it up with them.
To make some other real life comparisons, the F-35 started as the experimental X-35 aircraft, first flight in 2000. The production model had its first flight in 2006 and is going to enter full military service in 2015 because of the time needed to mass produce the volume of planes. That is 15 years not counting the on paper development time. From a real life perspective 30 year operational life is understandable. However considering Star Wars is fiction anything is possible, so everything I just wrote does not matter at all. I just wanted to mention things I know about planes.Hairless Mammoth said:Well, that kind of makes sense. The F/A-18 Hornet, and tons of other military planes, has been in service for over 30 years and probably won't be replaced for decades on most militaries it serves. After a 30 year rebellion and the costs that come with one, it's plausible that someone would still have several squadron's worth of X-wings in use, especially in a universe were technological advancement has reached a snail's pace. Or, it could just be Abrams riding the nostalgia train, again.Hawki said:-X-Wings...30 plus years and we're still using X-Wings. I mean, yeah, X-Wings are cool and all, but...ugh.
IIRC, that was actually a thing in the already-existing EU, which gives me high hopes that these movies might be covering the pre-Yuhzan Vong War EU, which means that Luke and Palpatine are going to be buffed to the level of major gods.Xeorm said:I'm not sure. That lightsaber broadsword made me absolutely cringe. It's quite possible to do worse than the prequel series.Corven said:It looks interesting, and they can't really go anywhere but up from here due to the prequel series.
If a cross guard makes you cringe then I'm assuming you haven't seen any saber designs outside of the films. in Star Wars: Rebels, the Inquisitor has a double-bladed light saber that spins like a fan.Xeorm said:I'm not sure. That lightsaber broadsword made me absolutely cringe. It's quite possible to do worse than the prequel series.Corven said:It looks interesting, and they can't really go anywhere but up from here due to the prequel series.