You, sir, have just been awarded a cookie.El Danny said:What's that? You don't think your kids should be playing this game?
Don't Buy It For Them Then. Problem Sorted.
Stop having tantrums when the rest of the world refuses to parent your children for them.
Pretty much this. Forget what rating it should have, does anyone else wonder who exactly would ever buy this game? I mean, regardless of age, the whole thing just seems retarded. And not in a "stupid but kinda fun" way, just in a "stupid and pointless and why am I wasting my time on this when I could be banging my head against a wall instead?" kind of way...Motakikurushi said:Rated 12+, as in you need to be 12 years old in order to like this shit. I'm surprised it received a 12 rating, but really... what else could it be? The PEGI rating system has dug itself into a hole. The gameplay actually shows nothing explicit or mature, it's how people are going to use it that's the problem. It's hard for me to care though, since I want this game to be cremated in the flames of hell for disgracing everything video games should be.
I concur. Bringing We Dare to a party or a group of friends in it of itself is like a dare, with the potential risk being laughed at, rejected, and banished forever as the awkward deviant who uses video games as an excuse to spank girls.In the end, it really is all about context of what you do with these silly mini-games. The actual We Dare game does nothing on its own it appears; it is merely the vehicle to creepy Wii-Ways, double entendre, or most likely, solo-Wii fantasies of having several attractive members of the opposite sex to Wii-waggle with.mikespoff said:Pretty much this. Forget what rating it should have, does anyone else wonder who exactly would ever buy this game? I mean, regardless of age, the whole thing just seems retarded. And not in a "stupid but kinda fun" way, just in a "stupid and pointless and why am I wasting my time on this when I could be banging my head against a wall instead?" kind of way...Motakikurushi said:Rated 12+, as in you need to be 12 years old in order to like this shit. I'm surprised it received a 12 rating, but really... what else could it be? The PEGI rating system has dug itself into a hole. The gameplay actually shows nothing explicit or mature, it's how people are going to use it that's the problem. It's hard for me to care though, since I want this game to be cremated in the flames of hell for disgracing everything video games should be.
at least someone understands how the system works..Aureliano said:See, this is the whole goal of the ratings board: to rate the game itself. Barbie Horse Adventure doesn't get rated AO just because somebody has probably masturbated to it at some point. The only gameplay in the ad that you probably have to do to play is tap the controller or rub two hands on its sides to respectively see two people fly through the air or eat an apple.
Unless the game includes sluts with proof of purchase, nothing in the game itself is either particularly offensive or mature.
Yeah. So could a game of Twister. You wanna pull that from the market?Andy Chalk said:"I have a 13 year old daughter and if I knew she was playing such a highly charged sexual game with boys, I would be appalled," said Laura Pearson of Birmingham. "It is encouraging under-age sex." Another parent said the game will "fuel sexual tensions" and could lead to "sexual touching or assault."
This is the impression I got from the trailer; that the game is just a collection of motion-controller minigames that you have the option of controlling by getting frisky with members of the opposite sex (or same sex, as the case may be). It doesn't make the game pornographic."There is no sexual activity," Hall said. "There is suggestion and innuendo if you're that way inclined but you don't actually see anything." The advertisement that appeared on YouTube [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBrxsNmQJO0] is "more extreme" than anything in the game, he added.
So this woman doesn't trust the ratings system (no big surprise), and apparently didn't pay any attention to the gameplay footage in the YouTube trailer.Labor MP and long-time game critic Keith Vaz predictably spoke out on the controversy, saying the 12+ rating was "clearly" wrong. "As a family friendly console, Wii must ensure that there are proper checks and a full consultation before games are graded for use by children," he said. "This game should not be released until these checks are made."
They would, lest their political opponents convince all the impressionable thickheads in their constituencies that said politicians "allowed a pornographic video game to be sold to children".Other "senior politicians" are also calling for the game's planned launch to be suspended while its content and rating are investigated, ...
Way to end the article with something to remind us that there's still some hope for humanity.... although at least one mother doesn't see what the big deal is. "It's only like a modern day spin the bottle," said Sandra Betts, who has a 15-year-old son. "It's just a bit of harmless fun."
5charThe Random Paradox said:Finally, somebody who knows what they're talking about.Andy Chalk said:Hall said typical 16-year-olds would find the game's content "beneath them."
lacktheknack said:When others learn that Americans have different ways of spelling and it's not the end of the world.WelshDanny said:Correction: Labour MP...
When will Americans learn to spell correctly?
I think the real question is: When will you two learn the difference between a proper noun and an improper noun/verb?BabyRaptor said:When will you learn that yours isn't the only correct spelling in the world?WelshDanny said:Correction: Labour MP...
When will Americans learn to spell correctly?